References
- Danel D, Pawlowski B. 2007. Eye-mouth-eye angle as a good indicator of face masculinization, asymmetry, and attractiveness (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 121:221–225
- DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Crawford JR, Welling LLM, Little AC. 2010. The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for masculinized male faces. Proc R Soc B 277:2405–2410
- Feinberg DR, DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Little AC. 2008. Correlated preferences for men's facial and vocal masculinity. Evol Hum Behav 29:233–241
- Fink B, Neave N, Seydel H. 2007. Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women. Am J Hum Biol 19:82–87
- Gallup AC, O’Brien DT, White DD, Wilson DS. 2010. Handgrip strength and socially dominant behavior in male adolescents. Evol Psychol 8:229–243
- Gallup AC, White DD, Gallup GG. 2007. Handgrip strength predicts sexual behavior, body morphology, and aggression in male college students. Evol Hum Behav 28:423–429
- Garver-Apgar CE, Eaton MA, Tybur JM, Thompson ME. 2011. Evidence of intralocus sexual conflict: physically and hormonally masculine individuals have more attractive brothers relative to sisters. Evol Hum Behav 32:423–432
- Getty T. 2002. Signaling health versus parasites. Am Nat 159:363–371
- Jasienska G, Ziomkiewicz A, Ellison PT, Lipson SF, Thune I. 2004. Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in woman. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1213–1217
- Klingenberg CP. 2003. A developmental perspective on developmental instability: theory, models, and mechanisms. In: Polak M, editor. Developmental instability: causes and consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p 14–34
- Klingenberg CP. 2011. MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol Ecol Res 11:353–357
- Kokko H, Brooks R, McNamara JM, Houston AI. 2002. The sexual selection continuum. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1331–1340
- Komori M, Kawamura S, Ishihara S. 2011. Multiple mechanisms in the perception of face gender: effect of sex-irrelevant features. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 37:626–633
- Lee AJ, Zietsch BP. 2011. Experimental evidence that women’s mate preferences are directly influenced by cues of pathogen prevalence and resource scarcity. Biol Lett 7:892–895
- Little AC, Jones BC, Waitt C, Tiddeman BP, Feinberg DR, Perrett DI, Apicella CL, Marlowe FW. 2008. Symmetry is related to sexual dimorphism in faces: data across culture and species. PLoS One 3:e2106
- Penton-Voak IS, Chen JY. 2004. High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine facial appearance in humans. Evol Hum Behav 25:229–241
- Puts DA. 2010. Beauty and the beast: mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evol Hum Behav 31:157–175
- Simmons LW, Rhodes G, Peters M, Koehler N. 2004. Are human preferences for facial symmetry focused on signals of developmental instability? Behav Ecol 15:864–871
- Smith MJ, Perrett DI, Jones BC, Cornwell RE, Moore FR, Feinberg DR, Boothroyd LG, et al. 2006. Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:135–140
- Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. 1999. Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn Sci 3:452–460
- Van Dongen S. 2009. A critical re-evaluation of the association between 2D:4D ratios and fluctuating asymmetry in humans. Ann Hum Biol 36:186–198
- Van Dongen S. 2011. Associations between asymmetry and human attractiveness: possible direct effects of asymmetry and signatures of publication bias. Ann Hum Biol 38:317–323
- Van Dongen S. 2012. Fluctuating asymmetry and masculinity/femininity in humans: a meta-analysis. Arch Sex Behav 41:1453–1460
- Van Dongen S, Gangestad SW. 2011. Human fluctuating asymmetry in relation to health and quality: a meta-analysis. Evol Hum Behav 32:380–398
- Van Dongen S, Sprengers E. 2012. Hand grip strength in relation to morphological measures of masculinity, fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behaviour in males and females. In: Raghvendra K, editor. Sex hormones. Rijeka, Croatia: Dubey, InTech. p 293–306
- Windhager S, Schaefer K, Fink B. 2011. Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived atttractiveness, dominance and masculinity. Am J Hum Biol 23:805–814