Educational and social class assortative mating in fertile British couples

References

• Agrawal A, Heath AC, Grant JD, Pergadia ML, Statham DJ, Bucholz KK, Martin NG, Madden PAF. 2006. Assortative mating for cigarette smoking and for alcohol consumption in female Australian twins and their spouses. Behav Genet 36:553–566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthold JA, Myrskylä M, Jones OR. 2012. Childlessness drives the sex difference in the association between income and reproductive success of modern Europeans. Evol Hum Behav 33:628–638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu AM. 2002. Why does education lead to lower fertility? A critical review of some of the possibilities. World Dev 30:1779–1790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman L. 1962. Assortative mating in man. Eugenics Rev 54:63–67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bereczkei T, Csanaky A. 1996. Mate choice, marital success, and reproduction in a modern society. Ethol Sociobiol 17:17–35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blossfeld HP, Timm A, editors. 2003. Who marries whom? Educational systems as marriage markets in modern societies. European studies of population. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Bollen KA, Glanville JL, Stecklov G. 2007. Socio-economic status, permanent income, and fertility: a latent-variable approach. Pop Stud-J Demog 61:15–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynin M, Longhi S, Pérez ÁM. 2008. The social significance of homogamy. ISER Working Papers 2008-32. Available online at: http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/publications/working-papers/iser/2008-32.pdf (accessed April 3, 2014)
   Google Scholar
• Clarkwest A. 2007. Spousal dissimilarity, race, and marital dissolution. J Marr Fam 69:639–653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia HR. 2003. Higher male educational hypergamy: evidence from Portugal. J Biosoc Sci 35:303–313
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diamond I, Newby M, Varle S. 1999. Female education and fertility: examining the links. In: Bledsoe CH, Casterline JB, Johnson-Kuhn JA, Haaga JG, editors. Critical perspectives on schooling and fertility in the developing world. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. p 23
   Google Scholar
• Dribe M, Nystedt P. 2010. Educational assortative matching and individual income development: results from longitudinal register data in Sweden 1990–2005. Paper for European Society for Population Economics, Essen, Germany, June 9–12, 2010
   Google Scholar
• Esteve A, García-Román J, Permanyer I. 2012. The gender-gap reversal in education and its effect on union formation: the end of hypergamy? Popul Dev Rev 38:535–546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteve A, McCaa R. 2008. Assortative mating patterns in the developing world. IUSSP International Seminar on changing transitions to marriage: gender implications for the next generation. Available online at: http://www.hist.umn.edu/~rmccaa/esteve_homogamy_iussp_2008.pdf (accessed April 3, 2014)
   Google Scholar
• Fieder M, Huber S. 2007. The effects of sex and childlessness on the association between status and reproductive output in modern society. Evol Hum Behav 28:392–398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieder M, Huber S, Bookstein F, Iber K, Schäfer K, Winckler G, Wallner B. 2005. Status and reproduction in humans. New evidence for the validity of evolutionary explanations on basis of a university sample. Ethology 111:940–950
   Google Scholar
• Glicksohn J, Golan H. 2001. Personality, cognitive style and assortative mating. Pers Indiv Differ 30:1199–1209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson S, Worku S. 2005. Assortative mating by education and postponement of couple formation and first birth in Britain and Sweden. Rev Econ Household 3:91–113
   Google Scholar
• Hopcroft R. 2006. Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States. Evol Hum Behav 27:104–120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber S, Bookstein FL, Fieder M. 2010. Socioeconomic status, education, and reproduction in modern women: an evolutionary perspective. Am J Hum Biol 22:578–587
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huber S, Fieder M. 2011. Educational homogamy lowers the odds of reproductive failure. PLoS ONE 6:e22330
   Google Scholar
• Hur Y-M. 2003. Assortative mating for personality traits, educational level, religious affiliation, height, weight, and body mass index in parents of a Korean twin sample. Twin Research 6:467–470
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalmijn M. 1991a. Shifting boundaries: trends in religious and educational homogamy. Am Sociol Rev 56:786–800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmijn M. 1991b. Status homogamy in the United States. Am J Sociol 97:496–523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan HS, Lancaster JB, Tucker WT, Anderson KG. 2002. An evolutionary approach to below replacement fertility. Am J Hum Biol 14:1–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katrňák T. 2008. Educational assortative mating in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary between 1976 and 2003. Sociológia 40:236–257
   Google Scholar
• Katrňák T, Kreidl M, Fónadová L. 2006. Trends in educational assortative mating in central Europe: the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, and Hungary, 1988–2000. Eur Sociol Rev 22:309–322
   Google Scholar
• Keller MC, Thiessen D, Young RK. 1996. Mate assortment in dating and married couples. Pers Indiv Differ 21:217–221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremer M, Chen D. 2002. Income distribution dynamics with endogenous fertility. J Econ Growth 7:227–258
   Google Scholar
• Lewis SK, Oppenheimer VK. 2000. Educational assortative mating across marriage markets: nonhispanic whites in the United States. Demography 37:29–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz-Zois CJ, Bradley AC, Mihalik JL, Moorman-Eavers ER. 2006. Perceived similarity and relationship success among dating couples: an idiographic approach. J Soc Pers Rel 23:865–880
   Google Scholar
• Mare RD. 1991. Five decades of educational assortative mating. Am Sociol Rev 56:15–32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mare RD, Schwartz CR. 2006. Educational assortative mating and the family background of the next generation. Sociol Theor Method 21:253–278
   Google Scholar
• Martín-García T, Baizán P. 2006. The impact of the type of education and of educational enrolment on first births. Eur Sociol Rev 22:259–275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascie-Taylor CGN. 1986. Assortative mating and differential fertility. Biol Soc 3:167–170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mascie-Taylor CGN. 1987. Assortative mating in a contemporary British population. Ann Hum Biol 14:59–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton NE, Chin SC, Ming PM. 1967. Genetics of interracial crosses in Hawaii. Basel: Karger
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen HS, Svarer M. 2009. Educational homogamy: how much is opportunities? J Hum Resour 44:1066–1086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian Z. 1998. Changes in assortative mating: the impact of age and education, 1970–1990. Demography 35:279–292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymo JM, Xie Y. 2000. Temporal and regional variation in the strength of educational homogamy. Am Sociol Rev 65:773–781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rendall MS, Smallwood S. 2003. Higher qualifications, first-birth timings and further childbearing in England and Wales. Population Trends 111:18–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sánchez-Andrés A, Mesa MS. 1994. Assortative mating in a Spanish population: effects of social factors and cohabitation time. J Biosoc Sci 26:441–450
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schoen R, Weinick RM. 1993. Partner choice in marriages and cohabitations. J Marriage Fam 55:408–414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz CR, Mare RD. 2005. Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography 42:621–646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seki M, Ihara Y, Aoki K. 2012. Homogamy and imprinting-like effect on mate choice preference for body height in the current Japanese population. Ann Hum Biol 39:28–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenk MK. 2009. Testing three evolutionary models of the demographic transition: patterns of fertility and age at marriage in urban South India. Am J Hum Biol 21:501–511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skirbekk V. 2008. Fertility trends by social status. Demogr Res 18:145–180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits J, Lammers J, Ultee W. 2000. More or less educational homogamy? A test of different versions of modernization theory using cross-temporal evidence for 60 countries. Am Sociol Rev 65:781–788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speakman JR, Djafarian K, Stewart J, Jackson DM. 2007. Assortative mating for obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 86:316–323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern C. 1973. Principles of human genetics. San Francisco, CA: Freeman
   Google Scholar
• Tsou M-W, Liu J-T, Hammitt JK. 2011. Parental age difference, educationally assortative mating and offspring count: evidence from a contemporary population in Taiwan. Biol Lett 7:562–566
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uunk WJG, Ganzeboom HBG, Róbert P. 1996. Bivariate and multivariate scaled association models: an application to homogamy of social origin and education in Hungary between 1930 and 1979. Qual Quant 30:323–343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeden J, Abrams MJ, Green MC, Sabini J. 2006. Do high-status people really have fewer children? Hum Nature-Int Bios 17:377–392
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whiting S. 2010. Socio-demographic comparison between those UK families with up to two children and those with three or more. Population Matters. Available online at: http://populationmatters.org/documents/family_sizes.pdf (accessed April 3, 2014)
   Google Scholar
• Woolf CM, Dukepoo FC. 1969. Hopi Indians, inbreeding and albinism. Science 164:30–37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zajonc RB, Adelmann PK, Murphy ST, Niendenthal PM. 1987. Convergence in the physical appearance of spouses. Motiv Emotion 11:335–346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zietsch BP, Verweij KJH, Heath AC, Martin NG. 2011. Variation in human mate choice: simultaneously investigating heritability, parental influence, sexual imprinting, and assortative mating. Am Nat 177:605–616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer BG. 1981. The impact of social mobility on fertility: a reconsideration. Pop Stud-J Demog 35:120–131
   Google Scholar