Foetal phonocardiographic signal denoising based on non-negative matrix factorization

References

• Villar, J., Ba’aqeel, H., Piaggio, G., Lumbiganon, P., Miguel Belizán, J., Farnot, U., Al-Mazrou, Y., Carroli, G., Pinol, A., Donner, A., Langer, A., Nigenda, G., Mugford, M., Fox-Rushby, J., Hutton G., Bergsjø, P., Bakketeig, L., Berendes, H., Garcia, J. 2001, WHO antenatal care randomized trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care. The Lancet, 357 (9268), 1551–1564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 1995, Fetal heart rate patterns: monitoring, interpretation, and management. ACOG technical bulletin no. 207. Washington, D.C. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 51, 65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, T.M., Montoro, M.N., Muderspach, L., Paulson, R., and Roy, S., 2010, Management of Common Problems in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 5th edn (Wiley-Blackwell, Singapore).
   Google Scholar
• Brunet, J.P., Tamayo, P., Golub, T.R., and Mesirov, J.P., 2004, Metagenes and molecular pattern discovery using matrix factorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 101, 4164–4169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J.F. Jr, 2008, Fetal health assessment using prenatal diagnostic techniques, Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 20, 152–156.
   Google Scholar
• Haverkamp, A.D., Thompson, H.E., McFee, J.G., Cetrulo, C. 1976, The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high risk pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 125, 310–320.
   Google Scholar
• Chourasia, V.S., and Tiwari, A.K., 2008, A review and comparative analysis of recent advancements in fetal monitoring techniques. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 36, 335–373.
   Google Scholar
• Kosa, E., Horvath, Cs., Kersner, N., Kadar, K., Kovacs, F., Torok, M., and Hosszu, G., 2008, Experiences with fetal phonocardiographic telemonitoring and future possibilities. 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 20–25 Aug. 2008, pp. 5859–5862, Vancouver, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Moghavvemi, M., Tan, B.H., and Tan, S.Y., 2003, A non-invasive PC-based measurement of fetal phonocardiography. Sensors and Actuators A, 107, 96–103.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, L.G., and Pibarot, P., 1995, Digital signal processing of the phonocardiogram: review of the most recent advancements. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 23, 163–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Várady, P., Wildt, L., Benyó, Z., and Hein, A., 2003, An advanced method in fetal phonocardiography. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 71, 283–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colley, N., Talbert, D.G., and Southall, D.P., 1986, Biophysical profile in the fetus from a phonographic sensor. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 23, 261–266.
   Google Scholar
• Várady, P., 2001, Wavelet-based adaptive denoising of phonocardiographic records. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2, 1846–1849.
   Google Scholar
• Jianfeng, C., Phua, K., Ying S., Shue, L. 2006, Fetal heart signal monitoring with confidence factor. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 9–12 July, pp. 1937–1940.
   Google Scholar
• Mittra, A.K., Shukla, A., and Zadgaonkar, A.S., 2007, System simulation and comparative analysis of foetal heart sound de-noising techniques for advanced phonocardiography. International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, 1, 73–85.
   Google Scholar
• Tosanguan, Baltimore, MD, T., Dickinson, R.J., and Drakakis, E.M., 2008, Modified spectral subtraction for de-noising heart sounds: interference suppression via spectral comparison. Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference, Baltimore MD, 20–22 November 2008, pp. 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Moraru, L., Sameni, R., Schneider, U., Jutten, C., Haueisen, J., and Hoyer, D., 2009, Identification of fetal auditory evoked cortical responses using a denoising method based on periodic component analysis. 4th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering, IFMBE Proceedings, 22, 1390–1393.
   Google Scholar
• Chourasia, V.S., and Mittra, A.K., 2010, Wavelet-based de-noising of fetal phonocardiographic signals. International Journal of Medical Engineering and Informatics, 2, 139–150.
   Google Scholar
• Paatero, P., and Tapper, U., 1997, Least squares formulation of robust nonnegative factor analysis. Chemometrics Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 37, 23–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D.D., and Seung, H.S., 1999, Learning the parts of objects by nonnegative matrix factorization. Nature, 401, 788–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M., and Foote, J., 2002, Summarizing video using non-negative similarity matrix factorization. Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, T., Li, S.Z., Shum, H.Y., and Zhang, H.J., 2002, Local non-negative matrix factorization as a visual representation. The 2nd International Conference on Development and Learning, 9-11 Dec. 2002, FX Palo Alto Lab., CA, USA, 178–183.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W., Zheng, N., and Lu, X., 2003, Non-negative matrix factorization for visual coding. IEEE International Conference on Acoustic, Speech and Signal Processing, 3, 293–296.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, B.W., Lu, J.J., and Huang, G.S., 2003, A constrained non-negative matrix factorization in information retrieval. IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, 273–277.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, W., Liu, X., and Gong, Y., 2003, Document clustering based on non-negative matrix factorization. Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 267–273.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Y.C., and Choi, S., 2005, Nonnegative features of spectro-temporal sounds for classification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 26, 1327–1336.
   Google Scholar
• Shahnaz, F., Berry, M., Pauca, P., and Plemmons, R., 2006, Document clustering using nonnegative matrix factorization. Information Processing and Management, 42, 373–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D.D., and Seung, H.S., 2001, Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 13, 556–562.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyer, P.O., 2004, Non-negative matrix factorization with sparseness constraints. Journal of Machine Learning and Research, 5, 1457–1469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cichocki, A., Zdunek, R., and Amari, S., 2006, Csiszar’s divergences for nonnegative matrix factorization: family of new algorithms. Springer Lecture Notes in Computing Science, 3889, 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Obaidat, M.S., 1993, Phonocardiogram signal analysis: techniques and performance comparison. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, 17, 221–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerwar, A.J., Pretlow, R.A., Stoughton, J.W., and Baker, D.A., 1993, Development of a piezopolymer pressure sensor for a portable fetal heart rate monitor. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 40, 963–969.
   Google Scholar
• Chourasia, V.S., and Tiwari, A.K., 2010, Wireless data acquisition for fetal phonographic signals using Bluetooth. International Journal of Computers in Healthcare, Oct; in press.
   Google Scholar
• Raskovic, D., Martin, T., and Jovanov, E., 2004, Medical monitoring applications for wearable computing. The Computer Journal, 47, 495–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chourasia, V.S., and Tiwari, A.K., 2009, Development of a signal simulation module for testing of phonocardiography based prenatal monitoring systems. Proceedings of 5th Annual conf of the IEEE (INDICON 2009), Ahmedabad, 18–20 December 2009, pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Roman, N., Wang, D.L., and Brown, G.J., 2003, Speech segregation based on sound localization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, 2236–2252.
   Google Scholar