514
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Three-dimensional kinematics of the lumbar spine during gait using marker-based systems: a systematic review

, &
Pages 172-185 | Received 03 Nov 2015, Accepted 11 Feb 2016, Published online: 24 Mar 2016

References

  • Gracovetsky SA. Range of normality versus range of motion: A functional measure for the prevention and management of low back injury. J Bodywork Move Ther. 2010;14:40–49.
  • Newman N, Gracovetsky S, Itoi M, et al. Can the computerized physical examination differentiate normal subjects from abnormal subjects with benign mechanical low back pain? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1996;11:466–473.
  • Kakushima M, Miyamoto K, Shimizu K. The effect of leg length discrepancy on spinal motion during gait: Three-dimensional analysis in healthy volunteers. Spine. 2003;28:2472–2476.
  • McCaw ST, Bates BT. Biomechanical implications of mild leg length inequality. Br J Sports Med. 1991;25:10–13.
  • Needham RA, Chockalingam N. Kinematic relationship between lower limbs and spine - Implications for assessing leg length discrepancy and low back pain. (Under review)
  • Cox ME, Asselin S, Gracovetsky SA, et al. Relationship between functional evaluation measures and self-assessment in nonacute low back pain. Spine. 2000;25:1817–1826.
  • Lee R. Measurement of movements of the lumbar spine. Physiother Theory Pract. 2002;18:159–164.
  • McGinley JL, Baker R, Wolfe R, et al. The reliability of three-dimensional kinematic gait measurements: A systematic review. Gait Posture. 2009;29:360–369.
  • Baker R. Gait analysis methods in rehabilitation. J Neuroengin Rehab. 2006;3:4.
  • MacWilliams BA, Rozumalski A, Swanson AN, et al. Assessment of three-dimensional lumbar spine vertebral motion during gait with use of indwelling bone pins. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2013;95:e1841–1848.
  • Rozumalski A, Schwartz MH, Wervey R, et al. The in vivo three-dimensional motion of the human lumbar spine during gait. Gait Posture. 2008;28:378–384.
  • Leardini A, Chiari L, Della Croce U, et al. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. Gait posture. 2005;21:212–225.
  • Leardini A, Biagi F, Merlo A, et al. Multi-segment trunk kinematics during locomotion and elementary exercises. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011;26:562–571.
  • Papaioannou T, Stokes I, Kenwright J. Scoliosis associated with limb-length inequality. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 1982;64:59–62.
  • Betsch M, Rapp W, Przibylla A, et al. Determination of the amount of leg length inequality that alters spinal posture in healthy subjects using rasterstereography. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:1354–1361.
  • White AA, Panjabi M. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1990.
  • Lovett RW. A contribution to the study of the mechanics of the spine. Am J Anat. 1903;2:457–462.
  • Al-Eisa E, Egan D, Deluzio K, et al. Effects of pelvic skeletal asymmetry on trunk movement: Three-dimensional analysis in healthy individuals versus patients with mechanical low back pain. Spine. 2006;31:E71–E79.
  • Pearcy MJ, Gill JM, Whittle MW, et al. Dynamic back movement measured using a three-dimensional television system. J Biomech. 1987;20:943–949.
  • Peters A, Galna B, Sangeux M, et al. Quantification of soft tissue artifact in lower limb human motion analysis: A systematic review. Gait Posture. 2010;31:1–8.
  • Bishop C, Paul G, Thewlis D. Recommendations for the reporting of foot and ankle models. J Biomech. 2012;45:2185–2194.
  • Crosbie J, Vachalathiti R, Smith R. Patterns of spinal motion during walking. Gait Posture. 1997;5:6–12.
  • Crosbie J, Vachalathiti R, Smith R. Age, gender and speed effects on spinal kinematics during walking. Gait Posture. 1997;5:13–20.
  • Morgenroth DC, Orendurff MS, Shakir A, et al. The relationship between lumbar spine kinematics during gait and low-back pain in transfemoral amputees. Am J Phys Med Rehab AAP. 2010;89:635–643.
  • Zhao G, Ren L, Ren L, et al. Segmental kinematic coupling of the human spinal column during locomotion. J Bionic Eng. 2008;5:328–334.
  • Zhao G, Ren L, Tian L, et al. A customized model for 3D human segmental kinematic coupling analysis by optoelectronic stereophotogrammetry. Sci China Technol Sci. 2010;53:2947–2953.
  • Rowe PJ, White M. Three dimensional, lumbar spinal kinematics during gait, following mild musculo-skeletal low back pain in nurses. Gait Posture. 1996;4:242–251.
  • Feipel V, De Mesmaeker T, Klein P, et al. Three-dimensional kinematics of the lumbar spine during treadmill walking at different speeds. Eur Spine J. 2001;10:16–22.
  • Taylor NF, Goldie PA, Evans OM. Angular movements of the pelvis and lumbar spine during self-selected and slow walking speeds. Gait Posture. 1999;9:88–94.
  • Steele J, Bruce-Low S, Smith D, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the effects of isolated lumbar extension exercise on lumbar kinematic pattern variability during gait in chronic low back pain. PMR. 2016;8:105–114.
  • Taylor NF, Evans OM, Goldie PA. The effect of walking faster on people with acute low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:166–172.
  • Taylor N, Goldie P, Evans O. Movements of the pelvis and lumbar spine during walking in people with acute low back pain. Physiother Res Int J Res Clin Phys Ther. 2004;9:74–84.
  • Vogt L, Pfeifer K, Portscher M, et al. Influences of nonspecific low back pain on three-dimensional lumbar spine kinematics in locomotion. Spine. 2001;26:1910–1919.
  • Thurston AJ. Spinal and pelvic kinematics in osteoarthrosis of the hip joint. Spine. 1985;10:467–471.
  • Thurston AJ. Repeatability studies of a television/computer system for measuring spinal and pelvic movements. J Biomed Eng. 1982;4:129–132.
  • Thurston AJ, Whittle MW, Stokes IAF. Spinal and pelvic movement during walking—a new method of study. ARCHIVE: Engin Med. 1981;10:219–222.
  • Thurston AJ, Harris JD. Normal kinematics of the lumbar spine and pelvis. Spine. 1983;8:199–205.
  • Callaghan JP, Patla AE, McGill SM. Low back three-dimensional joint forces, kinematics, and kinetics during walking. Clin Biomech. (Bristol, Avon). 1999;14:203–216.
  • Whittle MW, Levine D. Three-dimensional relationships between the movements of the pelvis and lumbar spine during normal gait. Hum Move Sci. 1999;18:681–692.
  • Vogt L, Pfeifer K, Banzer W. Comparison of angular lumbar spine and pelvis kinematics during treadmill and overground locomotion. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002;17:162–165.
  • Taylor NF, Evans OM, Goldie PA. Angular movements of the lumbar spine and pelvis can be reliably measured after 4 minutes of treadmill walking. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1996;11:484–486.
  • Vogt L, Banzer W. Measurement of lumbar spine kinematics in incline treadmill walking. Gait Posture. 1999;9:18–23.
  • Saunders SW, Schache A, Rath D, et al. Changes in three dimensional lumbo-pelvic kinematics and trunk muscle activity with speed and mode of locomotion. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005;20:784–793.
  • Konz RJ, Fatone S, Stine RL, et al. A kinematic model to assess spinal motion during walking. Spine. 2006;31:E898–E906.
  • Schache AG, Blanch PD, Rath DA, et al. Intra-subject repeatability of the three dimensional angular kinematics within the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex during running. Gait Posture. 2002;15:136–145.
  • Schache AG, Blanch P, Rath D, et al. Three-dimensional angular kinematics of the lumbar spine and pelvis during running. Hum Move Sci. 2002;21:273–293.
  • Gombatto SP, Collins DR, Sahrmann SA, et al. Gender differences in pattern of hip and lumbopelvic rotation in people with low back pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006;21:263–271.
  • Chung CY, Park MS, Lee SH, et al. Kinematic aspects of trunk motion and gender effect in normal adults. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2010;7:9.
  • Russell P, Pearcy MJ, Unsworth A. Measurement of the range and coupled movements observed in the lumbar spine. Br J Rheumatol. 1993;32:490–497.
  • Intolo P, Milosavljevic S, Baxter DG, et al. The effect of age on lumbar range of motion: A systematic review. Man Ther. 2009;14:596–604.
  • Chockalingam N, Chatterley F, Healy AC, et al. Comparison of pelvic complex kinematics during treadmill and overground walking. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2012;93:2302–2308.
  • Levine D, Colston MA, Whittle MW, et al. Sagittal lumbar spine position during standing, walking, and running at various gradients. J Athl Train. 2007;42:29–34.
  • Gallagher KM, Wong A, Callaghan JP. Possible mechanisms for the reduction of low back pain associated with standing on a sloped surface. Gait Posture. 2013;37:313–318.
  • Portus MR, Lloyd DG, Elliott BC, et al. Kinematic perturbation in the flexion-extension axis for two lumbar rigs during a high impact jump task. J Appl Biomech. 2011;27:137–142.
  • Vogt L, Portscher M, Brettmann K, et al. Cross-validation of marker configurations to measure pelvic kinematics in gait. Gait Posture. 2003;18:178–184.
  • Lee RY, Wong TK. Relationship between the movements of the lumbar spine and hip. Hum Move Sci. 2002;21:481–494.
  • Shum GLK, Crosbie J, Lee RYW. Movement coordination of the lumbar spine and hip during a picking up activity in low back pain subjects. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:749–758.
  • Scholtes SA, Gombatto SP, Van Dillen LR. Differences in lumbopelvic motion between people with and people without low back pain during two lower limb movement tests. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009;24:7–12.
  • Wong TKT, Lee RYW. Effects of low back pain on the relationship between the movements of the lumbar spine and hip. Hum Move Sci. 2004;23:21–34.
  • Davids K, Glazier P, Araújo D, et al. Movement systems as dynamical systems: The functional role of variability and its implications for sports medicine. Sports Med (Auckland, NZ). 2003;33:245–260.
  • Dufek JS, Bates BT, Stergiou N, et al. Interactive effects between group and single-subject response patterns. Hum Move Sci. 1995;14:301–323.
  • Stergiou N, Scott M. Baseline measures are altered in biomechanical studies. J Biomech. 2005;38:175–178.
  • Bates BT. Single-subject methodology: an alternative approach. Med Sci Sport Exer. 1996;28631–638.
  • Stergiou N, Bates BT. The relationship between subtalar and knee joint function as a possible mechanism for running injuries. Gait Posture. 1997;6:177–185.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.