The influence of the reciprocal hip joint link in the Advanced Reciprocating Gait Orthosis on standing performance in paraplegia

References

• Andrews B J, Barnett R W, Phillips G F, Kjrkwood C A, Donaldson N, Rushton D N, Perkins T A. Rule-based control of a hybrid FES orthosis for assisting paraplegic locomotion. Aulomedica 1989; 11: 175–199
   Google Scholar
• Cybulski G R, Jaeger R J. Standing performance of persons with paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 103–108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas R, Larson P F, D'Ambrosia R, McCall R E. The LSU reciprocating gait orthosis. Orthopedics 1983; 6: 834–839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrarin M, Stallard J, Palmieri R, Pedotti A. Estimation of deformation in a walking orthosis for paraplegic patients. Clin Biomech 1993; 8: 255–261
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrarin M, Rabuffetti M. On the improvement provided by hip transversal rotation on paraplegic gait walking with reciprocating orthosis. Neuroprosthetics - from basic research to clinical applications, A Pedotti, M Ferarin, J Quintern, R Reiner. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1996; 493–502
   Google Scholar
• Figoni S F. Cardiovascular and haemodynamic responses to tilting and to standing in tetraplegic patients: a review. Paraplegia 1984; 22: 99–109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gellman H, Sib I, Waters R L. Late complications of the weight-bearing upper extremity in the paraplegic patient. Clin Orthop 1988; 233: 132–135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurts A CH, Nienhuis B, Mulder ThW. Intrasubject variability of selected force-platform parameters in quantification of postural control. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 1144–1150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldie P A, Bach T M, Evans O M. Force platform measures for evaluating postural control: reliability and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 70: 510–517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IJzerman M J, Baardman G, Hermens H J, Veltink P H, Boom H BK, Zilvold G. The influence of the reciprocal cable linkage in the advanced reciprocating gait orthosis on paraplegic gait performance. Prosthet Orthot Int 1997; 21: 52–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jebsen R H, Taylor N, Trieschnann R B, Trotter M H, Howard L A. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1969; 50: 311–319
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jefferson R J, Whittle M W. Performance of three walking orthoses for die paralysed: a case study gait analysis. Prosthet Orthot Int 1990; 14: 103–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karcnik T, Krau A, Bajd T. Stability and energy criteria in healthy and paraplegic subjects gait. Proceedings of the 5th Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrostimulation. Austrian Society for Artificial Organs, Vienna 1995; 87–90
   Google Scholar
• Kunkel C F, Scremin A M, Eisenberg B, Garcia J F, Roberts S, Martinez S. Effects of “standing” on spasticity, contracture and osteoporosis in paralyzed man. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 73–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayagorria R E, Andrews B J. Stability in FES and orthoses assisted standing. Proceedings 3rd Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrostimulation. Austrian Society for Artificial Organs, Vienna 1989; 85–88
   Google Scholar
• Messenger N, Rithaua S V, Bowker P, Ogilvie C. Effects of ambulation on the blood flow in paralyzed limbs. J Homed Eng 1989; 11: 249–252
   Google Scholar
• Motloch W. Principles of orthotic management for child and adult paraplegia and clinical experience with the Isocentric RGO. Proceedings of 7th World Congress of the International Society in Prosthetics and Orthotics, Chicago, 1992. ISPO, Alexandria, VA June 28 - July 3, 1992; 28
   Google Scholar
• Moynahan M, Chjzbck H J. Characterization of paraplegic disturbance response during FNS standing. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1993; 1: 43–48
   Google Scholar
• Nene A V, Major R E. Dynamics of reciprocal gait of adult paraplegics using the Para Walker (Hip Guidance Orthosis). Prosthet Orthot Int 1987; 11: 124–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nene A V, Hermens H J, Zilvold G. Paraplegic locomotion: a review. Spinal Cord 1996; 34: 507–524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogilvie C, Bowker P, Rowley D I. The physiological benefits of paraplegic orthotically aided walking. Paraplegia 1993; 31: 111–115
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rose G K. The principles and practice of hip guidance articulations. Prosthet Orthot Int 1979; 3: 37–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobounov S, Newell K M. Postural dynamics as a function of skill level and task constraints. Gait Posture 1994; 2: 85–93
   Google Scholar
• Stallard J, Major R E, Patrick J H. A review of the fundamental design problems of providing ambulation for paraplegic patients. Paraplegia 1989; 27: 70–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stallard J, Major R E. The case for lateral stiffness in walking orthoses for paraplegic patients. /. Eng Med 1993; 207H: 1–6
   Google Scholar
• Stallard J, Major R E. The influence of orthosis stiffness on paraplegic ambulation and its implications for functional electrical stimulation (FES) walking systems. Prosthet Orthot Int 1995; 19: 108–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triolo R J, Rejlley B WB, Freedman W, Betz R R. Development and standardization of a clinical evaluation of standing function: the functional standing test. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1993; 1: 18–25
   Google Scholar
• Whittle M W, Cochrane G M. A comparative evaluation of the Hip Guidance Orthosis (HGO) and the Reciprocating Gait Orthosis (RGO). Health Equipment Information, No. 192. NHS Procurement Directotate, London 1989
   Google Scholar
• Whittle M W, Cochrane G M, Chase A P, Copping A V, Jefferson R J, Staples D J, Fenn P T, Thomas D C. A comparative trial of two walking systems for paralysed people. Paraplegia 1991; 29: 97–102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winchester P K, Carollo J J, Parekh R N, Lutz L M, Aston J W, JR. A comparison of paraplegic gait performance using two types of reciprocating gait orthoses. Prosthet Orthot Int 1993; 17: 101–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar