Conscious and anaesthetised Göttingen mini-pigs as an in-vivo model for buccal absorption – pH-dependent absorption of metoprolol from bioadhesive tablets

References

• Patel VF, Liu F, Brown MB. Modeling the oral cavity: in vitro and in vivo evaluations of buccal drug delivery systems. J Control Release 2012;161:746–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart JD. Buccal drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2005;2:507–17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicolazzo JA, Reed BL, Finnin BC. Buccal penetration enhancers – how do they really work? J Control Release 2005;105:1–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel VF, Liu F, Brown MB. Advances in oral transmucosal drug delivery. J Control Release 2011;153:106–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senel S, Hincal AA. Drug permeation enhancement via buccal route: possibilities and limitations. J Control Release 2001;72:133–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen J, Nielsen EB, Brondum-Nielsen K, et al. Filter-grown TR146 cells as an in vitro model of human buccal epithelial permeability. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:138–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artusi M, Santi P, Colombo P, Junginger HE. Buccal delivery of thiocolchicoside: in vitro and in vivo permeation studies. Int J Pharm 2003;250:203–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lestari ML, Nicolazzo JA, Finnin BC. A novel flow through diffusion cell for assessing drug transport across the buccal mucosa in vitro. J Pharm Sci 2009;98:4577–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm R, Meng-Lund E, Andersen MB, et al. In vitro, ex vivo and in vivo examination of buccal absorption of metoprolol with varying pH in TR146 cell culture, porcine buccal mucosa and Gottingen minipigs. Eur J Pharm Sci 2013;49:117–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapil R, Dhawan S, Beg S, Singh B. Buccoadhesive films for once-a-day administration of rivastigmine: systematic formulation development and pharmacokinetic evaluation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2013;39:466–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsagogiorgas C, Theisinger S, Holm P, et al. Buccal absorption of propofol when dosed in 1-perfluorobutylpentane to anaesthetised and conscious Wistar rats and Göttingen mini-pigs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2013;85:1310–16
   Google Scholar
• Hoogstraate AJ, Coos Verhoef J, Pijpers A, et al. In vivo buccal delivery of the peptide drug buserelin with glycodeoxycholate as an absorption enhancer in pigs. Pharm Res 1996;13:1233–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degim T, Eglen B, Ocak O. A sustained release dosage form of acyclovir for buccal application: an experimental study in dogs. J Drug Target 2006;14:35–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dali MM, Moench PA, Mathias NR, et al. A rabbit model for sublingual drug delivery: comparison with human pharmacokinetic studies of propranolol, verapamil and captopril. J Pharm Sci 2006;95:37–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurosaki Y, Takatori T, Nishimura H, et al. Regional variation in oral mucosal drug absorption: permeability and degree of keratinisation in hamster oral cavity. Pharm Res 1991;8:1297–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squier CA, Cox P, Wertz PW. Lipid content and water permeability of skin and oral mucosa. J Invest Dermatol 1991;96:123–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins PLJ, Squier CA. Comparative study of porcine oral epithelium. J Dent Res 1981;60:543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolazzo JA, Finnin BC. Drug absorption studies. Springer US 2008;7:89–111
   Google Scholar
• Teubl BJ, Absenger M, Frohlich E, et al. The oral cavity as a biological barrier system: design of an advanced buccal in vitro permeability model. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2013;84:386–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi RB, Robinson JR. Oral cavity as a site for bioadhesive drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1994;13:43–74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja A, Khar RK, Ali J. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1997;23:489–515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore PA, Brodie BB, Hogben CA. The gastric secretion of drugs: a pH partition hypothesis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1957;119:361–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz Del Consuelo IFF, Guy RH, Jacques Y. Transport of fentanyl through pig buccal and esophageal epithelia in vitro: influence of concentration and vehicle pH. Pharm Res 2005;22:1525–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutel-Egros A, Maitani Y, Veillard M, et al. Combined effects of pH, cosolvent and penetration enhancers on the in vitro buccal absorption of propranolol through excised hamster cheek pouch. Int J Pharm 1992;84:117–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deneer VH, Drese GB, Roemele PE, et al. Buccal transport of flecainide and sotalol: effect of a bile salt and ionization state. Int J Pharm 2002;241:127–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zuo Z, Chow MS. HO-1-u-1 model for screening sublingual drug delivery – influence of pH, osmolarity and permeation enhancer. Int J Pharm 2009;370:68–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wang Z, Zuo Z, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of buffered propranolol sublingual tablet (promptol)-application of a new “physiologically based” model to assess absorption and disposition. AAPS J 2013;15:787–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avdeef A, Berger CM. pH-metric solubility. 3. Dissolution titration template method for solubility determination. Eur J Pharm Sci 2001;14:281–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg KO, Carlsson E, Hoffmann KJ, et al. Metabolism of metoprolol-(3-h) in man, the dog and the rat. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh) 1975;36:125–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lennernas H, Nylander S, Ungell AL. Jejunal permeability: a comparison between the ussing chamber technique and the single-pass perfusion in humans. Pharm Res 1997;14:667–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen KD, Sander C, Baldursdottir S, et al. Development of an ex vivo retention model simulating bioadhesion in the oral cavity using human saliva and physiologically relevant irrigation media. Int J Pharm 2013;448:373–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YF, Zuo Z, Chen X, et al. Improving sublingual delivery of weak base compounds using pH(max) concept: application to propranolol. Eur J Pharm Sci 2010;39:272–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar