References
- Beagley H. A., Knight J. J. Methods of objective audiometry. J. Laryng. 1966; 80: 1127
- Beagley H. A., Knight J. J. Changes in auditory evoked response with intensity. J. Laryng. 1967; 81: 861
- Bickford Ft. G., Jacobson J. L., Cody D. T. Ft., Lambert E. H. Physiological properties of postauricular response (sonomotor). Science 1958; 128: 1210
- Cody D. T. R., Jacobson J. L., Walker J. C., Bicford Ft. G. Averaged evoked myogenic and cortical potentials to sound in man. Ann. Otol. 1964; 73: 763
- Cody D. T. R., Bickford Ft. G. Cortical audiometry; an objective method of evaluating auditory acuity in man. Proc. Mayo Clin. 1965; 40: 273
- Davis H. Slow cortical responses evoked by acoustic stimuli. Acta oto-laryng. 1965; 59: 179
- Davis H. Slow cortical responses evoked by acoustic stimuli. Acta otolaryng., Suppl. 1965; 206: 128
- Grey Walter, Cooper R., Aldridge V. J., McCallum W. C., Winter A. L. Contingent negative variation: an electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature 1964; 203: 380
- McCandless G. A., Lentz W. E. Evoked response (EEG) audiometry in nonorganic hearing loss. Arch. Otolaryng. 1968; 87: 123
- Rapin I. Evoked responses in a group of children with communication disorders. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1964; 112: 182
- Rapin I., et al. Auditory evoked responses in normal, brain- damaged and deaf infants. Neurology (Minn.) 1967; 17: 881–894