Technology : Flow Cytometry: Principles and Applications. II

References

• Adams LR, Kamentsky LA: Machine characterization of human leukocytes by acridine orange fluorescence. Acta Cytol 15:289–291, 1971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig SH, Brown RD, Kamentsky LA, et al: A report of the efficacy of a rapid cell spectrophotometer in screening for cervical cancer. Cancer 21:1019–1026, 1968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulett HR, Bonner WA, Barret J, et al: Cell sorting; Automated separation of mammalian cells as a function of intracellular fluorescence. Science 166:747–749, 1969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner WA, Hulett HR, Sweet RG, et al: Fluorescence activated cell sorting. Rev Sei Instrum 43: 404-409,1972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulwyler Ml: Electronic separation of biological cells by volume. Science 150: 910–911, 1965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinkamp JA, Fulwyler Ml, Coulter JR, et al: A new multiparameter separator for microscopie particles and biological cells. Rev Sei Instrum 44:1301–1310, 1973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dilla MA, Trujillo TI, Mullaney PF, et al: Cell microfluorometry: A method for rapid fluorescence measurements. Science 163:1213–1214, 1969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crissman HA, Steinkamp JA: Rapid simultaneous measurement of DNA, protein, and cell volume in single cells from large mammalian cell populations. J Cell Biol 59:766–771, 1973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittrich W, Gôhde W: Impulsfluorometrie bei einzelzellen in suspensionen. Z Naturforsch 24b:360-361, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Gôhde W, Schumann J, Buchner T, et al: Pulse cytophotometry: Application in tumor cell biology and in clinical oncology. In Flow Cytometry and Sorting, Melamed MR, Mullaney PF, Mendelsohn ML, Eds: John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979, pp 599–620.
   Google Scholar
• Laerum OD, Farsund T: Clinical application of flow cytometry: A review. Cytometry 2:1–13, 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kruth HS: Flow cytometry: Rapid biochemical analysis of cells. Anal Biochem 125: 225–242, 1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlogie B, Raber MN, Schumann J, et al: Flow cytometry in clinical cancer research. Cancer Res 43:3982–3987, 1983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traganos F: Flow cytometry, principles and applications. 1. Cancer Invest, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Bôhmer R-M, Baisch H: Kinetic response of asynchronously growing L-cells to trypsinization, as determined by flow cytometry. In Flow Cuytometry IV, Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 354–358.
   Google Scholar
• Thornthwaite JT, Sugarbaker EV, Temple WJ: Preparation of tissues for DNA flow cytometric analysis, Cytometry 1:229–237, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Soman S, Kaplow LS: Disaggregation of bone marrow spicules for studies by flow cytometry. In Flow Cytometry IV, Laerum 00, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 59–62.
   Google Scholar
• Rutgers DH: Cell suspension preparation of solid tumors for flow cytometry. In Flow Cytometry IV, Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 67–69.
   Google Scholar
• Vindelov LL, Christensen U, Nissen NI: A detergent-trypsin method for the preparation of nuclei for flow cytometric DNA analysis. Cytometry 3:323–327, 1983.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zante J, Schumann J, Barlogie B, et al: New preparation and staining procedures for specifie and rapid analysis of DNA distributions. In Pulse Cytophotometry, Gëhde W, Schumann J, Buchner T, European Press, Ghent, 1976, pp 97–111.
   Google Scholar
• Goerttler K, Balmain A, Sauerbom R: Comparison of various cell dispersal techniques applied to the model of mouse skin. In Pulse Cytophotometry, Gëhde W, Schumann J, Buchner T, Eds: European Press, Ghent, 1976, pp 156–161.
   Google Scholar
• Pallavicini MG, Cohen AM, Dethlefsen LA, et al: Dispersal of solid tumors for flow cytometry (FCM) analysis. In Pulse Cytophotometry, Lutz D, Ed: European Press, Ghent, 1978, pp 473–482.
   Google Scholar
• Vindelov LL: A new method for rapid isolation and staining of nuclei for FMF-analysis of nuclear DNA in cells from solid tissues and cell suspensions. In Pulse Cytophotometry, Lutz D, Bd: European Press, Ghent, 1978, pp 483–488.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar GJ, Todd P, Sattilaro RF: The dispersal of cells from human gynecologie specimens: Chemical agents. J Histochem Cytochem 25:513–524, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia GL, Tolles WE: Ultrasonic disaggregations of cell clusters. J Histochem Cytochem 25:508–512, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noel JS, Zucker RM, Wu N-C, et al: The dissociation of transplantable tumors. J Histochem Cytochem 25:544–553, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lief RC, Nordqvist S, Clay S, et al: A procedure for dissociating Ayre scrape samples. J Histochem Cytochem 25:525–537, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brittain MG: Tissue disaggregation. In Flow Cytometry and Sorting, Melamed MR, Mullaney PF, Mendelsohn ML, Eds: John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979, pp 193–205.
   Google Scholar
• Crissman HA, Mullaney PF, Steinkamp JA: Methods and applications of flow systems for analysis and sorting of mammalian cells. Methods Cell Biol 9:179–246, 1975.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Sharpless T, et al: Lymphocyte stimulation: A rapid multiparameter analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:2881–2884, 1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traganos F, Darzynkiewicz Z, Sharpless T, et al: Simultaneous staining of ribonucleic and deoxyribonucleic acids in unfixed cells using acridine orange in a flow cytogluorometric system. J Histochem Cytochem 25:46–56, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller W, Gautier F: Interactions of heteroaromatic cornpounds with nucleic acids; A-T specifie nonintercalating ONA ligands. Eur J Biochem 54:384–394, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Gôhde W, Schumann J, Zante J: The use of DAPI in pulsecytophotometry. In Pulse Cytophotometry, Lutz D, Ed: European Press, Ghent, 1978, pp 229–232.
   Google Scholar
• Schendl W, Lutz D: Cytofluorometric analysis of nuclei and chromosomes by DIPI staining. In Pulse Cytophotometry, Lutz D, Ed: European Press, Ghent, 1978, pp 233–237.
   Google Scholar
• Latt SA: Fluorescent probes of DNA microstructure and synthesis. In Flow Cytometry and Sorting, Melamed MR, Mullaney PF, Mendelsohn ML, Eds: John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979, pp 263–284.
   Google Scholar
• Crissman HA, Stevenson AP, Kissane RJ, et al: Techniques for quantitative staining of cellular DNA for flow cytometric analysis. In Flow Cytometry and Sorting, Melamed MR, Mullaney PF, Mendelsohn ML, Eds: John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979, pp 243–261.
   Google Scholar
• Traganos F, Darzynkiewicz Z, Sharpless T, et al: Cytofluorometric studies on conformation of nucleic acids in situ. 1. Restriction of acridine orange binding by chromatin proteins. J Histochem Cytochem 24: 40-48, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Kapuscinski J, et al: Accessibility of DNA in situ to various fluorochromes. Relationship to erythroid differentiation of Friend leukemia cells. Cytornetry, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Traganos F, Darzynkiewicz Z, Sharpless T, et al: Erythroid différentiation of Friend leukemia cells as studied by acridine orange staining and flow cytometry. J Histochem Cytochem 27:382–389, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crissman HA, Stevenson AP, Kissane RJ: Flow microfluorometric and spectrophotofluorometric analysis of DNA staining in rnammalian cells. In Pulse Cytophotometry, Lutz D, Ed: European Press, Ghent, 1978, pp 251–266.
   Google Scholar
• Coulson PB, Bishop AP, Lenarduzzi R: Quantitation of cellular deoxyribonucleic acid by flow cytometry. J Histochern Cytochem 25:1147–1153, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traganos F, Darzynkiewicz Z, Sharpless T, et al: Nucleic acid content and cell cycle distributions of live hurnan bladder cell lines analysed by flow cytofluorometry. In J Cancer 20:30–36, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulwyler MJ: Standards for flow cytometry. In Flow Cytometry and Sorting, Melaned MR, Mullaney PF, Mendelsohn ML, Eds: John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979, pp 351–358.
   Google Scholar
• Alabaster O, Tannenbaum E, Habbersett M, et al: Drug induced changes in DNA fluorescence intensity detected by flow microfluorornetry and their implications for analysis of DNA content distributions. Cancer Res 38: 1031–1035, 1978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alabaster O, Magrath IT, Habbersett MC, et al: Effects of cyclophosphamide on the mithramycin-DNA fluorescence of human lymphoma cells. A possible result of guanine alkylation. J Histochem Cytochern 27:500–504, 1977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlogie B, Gôhde W, Drewinko B: Flow cytometric analysis of DNA content for ploidy determination in solid tumors. J Histochem Cytochem 27:505–507, 1977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vindelov LL, Christensen IJ, Nissen NI: Standardization of high resolution flow cytornetric DNA analysis by the simultaneous use of chic ken and trout red blood cells as internai reference standards. Cytornetry 3:328–331, 1983.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jakobsen A: The use of trout erythrocytes and human lymphocytes for standardization in flow cytornetry. Cytometry 4: 161-165, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Howard A, Pele SR: Nuclear incorporation of 3Zp as demonstrated by autoradiographs. Exp Cell Res 2: 178-187, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Baisch H, Beek HP: Cornparison of cell kinetic parameters obtained by flow cytomerry and autoradiography. In Biomathematics and Cell Kinetics, Valleron AJ, Macdonald PDM, Eds: Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam, 1978, pp 411–422.
   Google Scholar
• Baisch H, Gôhde W, Linden WA: Analysis of PCP-data to determine the fraction of cells in the various phases of cell cycle. Radiat Environ Biophys 12:31–39, 1975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean PN, Jett JH: Mathematical analysis of DNA distributions derived from flow microfluorometry. J Cell Biol 60:523–527, 1974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean PN: Quantitative analysis of flow systems data. In Pulse Cytophotometrv; Lutz D, Ed: European Press, Ghent, 1978, pp 63–70.
   Google Scholar
• Fried J: Method for the quantitative evaluation of data from flow microfluoromctry. Comp Biorned Res 9: 263-276, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Fried J: Analysis of deoxyribonucleic acid histograms from flow cytofluorometry. J Histochem Cytochem 25:942–951, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Gray JW: CeIl-cycle analysis of pertrubed cell populations: Computer simulation of sequential DNA distributions. Cell Tissue Kinet 9: 499-516, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Jett JH: Mathematical analysis of DNA histograms from asynchronous and synchronous cell populations. In Pulse Cytophotometry, Lutz D, Ed: European Press, Ghent, 1978, pp 93–102.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen I, Hartmann NR, Keiding N, et al: Statistical analysis of DNA-distributions from cell populations with partial synchrony. In Pulse Cytophotometry, Lutz D, Ed: European Press, Ghent, 1978, pp 71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Bagwell CB, Hudson JL, Irvin GL: Nonparametric flow cytometry analysis, J Histochern Cytochem 27:293–296, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindmo T, Aarnaes E: Selection of optimal model for the DNA histogram by analysis of error of estirnated parameters. J Hisochern Cytochem 27:297–304, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson JV: The application of age distribution theory in the analysis of cytofluorometric DNA histogram data. Cell Tissue Kinet 10:157–169, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Gray JW, Dean PN, Mendelsohn ML: Quantitative cell cycle analysis, In Flow Cytometry and Sorting, Melamed MR, Mullaney PF, Mendelsohn ML, Eds: John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979, pp 383–407.
   Google Scholar
• Baisch HP, Beek H-P, Christensen IJ, et al: Cornparison of evaluation methods for DNA histograms measured by flow cytometry. In Flow Cytometry IV, Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 152–155.
   Google Scholar
• Latt SA, Stetten G: Spectral studies on 33258 Hoechst and related bisbenzimidazole dyes useful for fluorescent detection of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis. J Histochem Cytochem 24:24–33, 1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latt SA, George YS, Gray JW: Flow cytometric analysis of brornodeoxyuridine-substituted cells stained with 33258 Hoechst. J Histochem Cytochem 25:927–934, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartzendruber DG: A bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR)mithramycin technique for detecting cycling and noncycling cells by flow microfluorometry. Exp Cell Res 109: 439-443, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Andreeff M, Traganos F, et al: Discrimination of cycling and non-cycling lymphocytes by BUdR-suppressed acridine orange fluorescence in a flow cytornetric system. Exp Cell Res 115:31–35, 1978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratzner HG, Leif RC: An immunofluorescence method for monitoring DNA synthesis by flow cytornetry. Cytometry 1:385–389, 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gratzner HG, Pollack A, Ingram DJ, et al: Deoxyribonucleic acid replication in single cells and chromosomes by immunologie techniques. J Histochem Cytochem 24:34–39, 1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro HM: Flow cytometric estimation of DNA and RNA content in intact cells stained with Hoechst 33342 and pyronin Y. Cytometry 2:143–150, 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frankfurt OS: Flow cytornetric analysis of double-stranded RNA content distributions. J Histochern Cytochem 28: 663-669, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Tanke HJ, Nieuwenhuis IAB, Koper GJM, et al: Flow cytometry of hum an reticulocytes based on RNA fluorescence. Cytometry 1:313–320, 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steinkamp JA, Crissman HA: Autornated analysis of dccxyribonucleic acid, protein and nuclear to cytoplasmic relationships in tumor cells and gynecologie specimens. J Histochem Cytochem 22:616–621, 1974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stohr, Vogt-Schaden M, Knobloch M, et al: Evaluation of eight f1uorochrome combinations for simultaneous DNA-protein flow analysis. Stain Technol 53:205–215, 1978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crissman HA, Oka MS, Steinkamp JA: Rapid staining methods for analysis of deoxyribonucleic acid and protein in mammalian cells. J Histochem Cytochem 24:64–71, 1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gôhde W, Spies l, Schumann J, et al: Two parameter analysis of DNA and protein content of tumor cells. In Pulse Cytophotometry, Gohde W, Schumann T, Buchner T, Eds: European Press, Ghent, 1976, pp 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Valet G, Hanser G, Ruhenstroth-Bauer G: Computer analysis of two parameter histograms of rat bone marrow cells. Cell volume to DNA relationship measured by means of flow cytometry. In Pulse Cytophotometrv, Lutz D, Ed: European Press, Ghent, 1978, pp 127–136.
   Google Scholar
• Loken MR: Simultaneous quantitation of Hoechst 33342 and immunofluorescence on viable cells using a fluorescence activated cell sorter. Cytometry 1:136–142, 1980.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braylan RC, Benson NA, Nourse V, et al: Correlated analysis of cellular DNA membrane antigens and light scatter of human Iymphoid cells. Cytometry 2:337–343, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roti Roti JL., Higashikubo R, Blair OC, et al: Cell-cycle position and nuclear protein content. Cytometry 3:91–96, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steinkamp JA, Stewart CC, Crissman HA: Three-color fluorescence measurements on single cells excited at three laser wavelengths. Cytometry 2:226–231, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Sharpless T, et al: Thermal denaturation of DNA in situ as studied by acridine orange staining and automated cytofluorometry. Exp Cell Res 90:411–428, 1975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Arlin ZA, et al: Cytofluorometric studies on conformation of nucleic acids in situ. 11. Denaturation of deoxyribonucleic acid. J Histochem Cytochem 24: 49-58, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Sharpless T, et al: Recognition of cells in mitosis by flow cytofluorometry. J Histochem Cytochem 25:875–880, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Sharpless T, et al: Differentiai stainability of M vs G2 and Go vs G1 cells. In Pulse Cytophotometry; Gëhde W, Schumann J, Buchner T, Eds: European Press, Ghent, 1978, pp 267–273.
   Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Sharpless T, et al: Different sensitivity of DNA in situ in interphase and metaphase chromatin to heat denaturation. J Cell Biol 73: 128–138, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Sharpless T, et al: Interphase and metaphase chromatin. Different stainability of DNA with acridine orange after treatment at low pH. Exp Cell Res 110:201–214, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Kipp JBA, Jongsma APM, Barendsen GW: Cell cycle phase durations derived by a flow cytofluorometric method using the mitotic inhibitor vinblastine. In Flow Cytometry IV, Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 341–344.
   Google Scholar
• Langen P, Graetz H, Lehmann E: The use of cytosine arabinoside and colchicin in FCM analysis of cell cycle effects of inhibitors in an asynchronous cell culture. In Flow Cytometry IV. Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E. Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 362–366.
   Google Scholar
• Renning OW, Lindmo T, Petersen EO, et al: Kinetics of entry into S phase and into G1 phase of the subsequent cell cycle for synchronized NHIK 3025 cells. In Flow Cytometry IV. Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 350–353.
   Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Evenson DP, Staiano-Coico L, et al: Correlation between cell cycle duration and RNA content. J Cell Physiol 100:425–438, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darzynikiewicz Z, Evenson D, Staiano-Coico L, et al: Relationship between RNA content and progression of lymphocytes through S phase of cell cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sei USA 76:358–362, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traganos F, Darzynkiewicz Z, Melamed MR: RNA content and the cell cycle. In Flow Cytometry IV, Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 331–335.
   Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Evenson DP, Staiano-Coico L, et al: Duration of G1 amd S phase of individual cells in populations correlated with their RNA content. In Flow Cytometry IV. Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 336–340.
   Google Scholar
• Fujikawa-Yamamoto K: RNA dependence in the cell cycle of V79 cells. J Cell Physiol 112:60–66, 1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor IW, Tattersall MHN, Fox RM: Flow cytometry analysis of unbalanced œil growth. In Flow Cytometry IV. Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 516–521.
   Google Scholar
• Traganos F, Darzynkiewicz Z, Melamed MR: The ratio of RNA to total nucleic acid content as a quantitative measure of unbalanced cell growth. Cytometry 2:212–218, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Andreeff M: Multiparameter flow cytometry. Part 1. Application in analysis of the cell cycle. Clin Bull I1:47–57, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F: RNA content and chromatin structure in cycling and noncycling œil populations studied by flow cytometry. In Genetic Expression in the Cell Cycle, Padilla GM, McCarty KS, Eds: Academie Press, New York, 1982, pp 103–128.
   Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Crissman, H, Traganos F, et al: Cell heterogeneity during the cell cycle. J Cell Phys 113:465–474, 1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z: Cytochemical probes of cycling and quiescent cells applicable for flow cytometry. In Techniques of Cell Kinetics, Gray JW, Darzynkiewicz Z, Eds: Humana Press, New York, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z: Molecular interactions and cellular changes during the œil cycle. Phannacol Therap 21: 143-188, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Kimme1 M: Assay of cell cycle kinetics by multiparameter flow cytometry using the principle of stathmokinesis. In Techniques of Cell Kinetics, Gray JW, Darzynkiewicz Z, Eds: Humana Press, New York, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel M, Traganos F, Darzynkiewicz Z: Do ail the daughter cells enter the indetenninate (“A”) state of the cell cycle? Analysis of stathmokinetic experiments on 1.1210 cells. Cytometry 4: 191-201, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Beck H–P: Proliferation kinetics of perturbed cell populations detennined by the bromodeoxyuridine-33258 technique. Radiotoxic effects of incorporated ('H) thymidime. Cytometry 2: 170–174, 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hieber L, Beek H-P, Lucke-Huhle C: G2 delay after irradiation with alpha-particles as studied in synchronized cultures and by the bromodeoxyuridine-33258 H technique. Cytometry 2:175–178, 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nusse M: Cell cycle kinetics of irradiated synchronous and asynchronous tumor cells with DNA distribution analysis and BrdUrd-Hoechst 33258-technique. Cytometry 2:70–79, 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noguchi PD, Johnson lB, Browne W: Measurement of DNA synthesis by flow cytometry. Cytometry 1:390–393 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohmer R-M, Ellwart 1: Cell cycle analysis by combining the 5-bromodeoxyuridine/33258 Hoechst technique with DNAspecifie ethidium bromide staining. Cytometry 2:31–34, 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kubbies M, Rabinovitch PS: Flow cytometric analysis of factors which influence the BrdUrd-Hoechst quenching effects in cultured human fibroblasts and lymphocytes. Cytometry 3:276–281, 1983.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Melamed MR: Distinction between 5-bromodeoxyuridine Iabeled and unlabeled mitotic cells by flow cytometry. Cytometry 3:345–348, 1983.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yatoganas X, Clarkson BD: Flow microfluorometric analysis of cell killing with cytotoxic drugs. 1 Histochern Cytochem 22:651–659, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Gôhde W, Meistrich M, Meyn R, et al: Cell-cycle phasedependence of drug induced cycle progression delay. 1 Histochem Cytochem 27: 470-473, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Heby O, Andersson G, Gray lW: Flow cytometric evaluation of Ehrlich ascities tumor cell kinetics following polyamine synthesis inhibition. In Pulse Cytophotometry, Lutz D, Ed: European Press, Ghent, 1978. pp 311–320.
   Google Scholar
• Barlogie B, Drewinko B: Cell cycle stage dependent induction of G2 phase arrest by different antitumor agents. In Pulse Cvtophotometry; Lutz D, Ed: European Press, Ghent, 1978, pp 545–552.
   Google Scholar
• Barranco SC, May JT, Boerwinkle W. et al: Enhanced cell killing through the use of cell kinetics-directed treatment schedule for two drug combinations in vitro. Cancer Res 42:2894–2898, 1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhuyan BK, Newell KA, Crampton SL, et al: CC-1065 (NSC 298223), A most potent antitumor agent: Kinetics of inhibition of growth, DNA synthesis, and cell survival. Cancer Res 42:3532–3537, 1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor IW, Tattersall MHN: Methotrexate cytotoxicity in cultured human leukemia cells studied by flow cytometry. Cancer Res 41:1549–1558, 1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drewinko B, Barlogie B: The relevance of cell kinetics in determining drug activity in vitro. In Cell Growth, Nicolini C. Ed: Plenum Publisning Co., New York, 1982, pp 749–772.
   Google Scholar
• Drewinko B, Barlogie B: Cell cycle perturbation effects. In Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology: Antitumor Drug Resistance, Fox BW, Fox M, Eds: Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Drewinko B, Patchen M, Yang L-Y, et al: DifferentiaI killing cfficacy of twenty antitumor drugs on proliferating and nonproliferating human tumor cells. Cancer Res 41:2328–2333, 1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drewinko B, Roper P, Barlogie B: Patterns of cell survival following treatment with antitumor agents in vitro. Eur 1 Cancer 15:92-99, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Evenson DP, Darzynkiewicz Z, Staiano-Coico L, et al: Effects of 9.IO-anthracenedione, 1,4-bis((2-((2-hydroxyethyl)amino)ethyl)amino) diacetate on cell survival and cell cycle progression in cultured mammalian cells. Cancer Res 39:2574-2581, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Traganos F, Stainao-Coico L, Darzynkiewicz Z, et al: Effects of ellipticine on cell survival and cell cycle progression in cultured mammalian cells. Cancer Res 40:2390–2399, 1980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traganos F, Staiano-Coico L, Darzynkiewicz Z, et al: Effects of dihydro-5-azacytidine on cell survival and cell cycle progression of cultured mammalian cells. Cancer Res 41:780–789, 1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traganos F, Staiano-Coico L. Darzynkiewicz Z, et al: Effects of aclacinomycin on cell survival and cell cycle progression of cultured mammalian cells. Cancer Res 41:2728–2737, 1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Xue S, et al: Effects of nbutyrate on cell cycle progression and in situ chromatin structure of L1210 cells. Exp Cell Res 136: 279-293, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Dethlefsen LA, Bauer KD, Riley RM: Analytic cytometric approaches to heterogenous cell populations in solid tumors: A review. Cytometry 1:89–97, 1980.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bauer KD, Dethlefsen LA: Control of cellular proliferation in HeLa-S3 suspension cultures. Characterization of cultures utilizing acridine orange staining procedure. 1 Cell Physiol 108:99–112, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z. Sharpless T, Staiano-Coico L, et al: Subcompartments of the G I phase of cell cycle detected by flow cytometry. Proc Natl Acad Sei USA 77:6696–6699, 1980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Melamed MR: New cell cycle compartments identified by flow cytometry. Cytometry 1:98–108, 1980.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Priesler H, Darzynkiewicz Z: Flow cytornetric analysis of prolifcrating and quiescent human leukernia cells. 1 Med 12: 415-425, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Watson JV, Chambers SH: Nucleic acid profile of the EMT6 cell cycle in vitro. Cell Tissue Kinet 11:415–422, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Traganos F, Darzynkiewicz Z, Staiano-Coico L. et al: Rapid automatic analysis of the cell cycle point of action of cytostatic drugs. In Flow Cytometry IV, Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 511–515.
   Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Xue S. et al: Rapid analysis of drug effects on the cell cycle. Cytometry 1:279–286, 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Dilla MA, Pinkel D, Gledhill B, et al: Flow cytometry of mammalian sperm. Progress report. In Flow Cytometry IV, Laerum OD, Lindrno T, Thorud E, Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 279–283.
   Google Scholar
• Rudloff PR, Eipel HE: Effects of ““Co-gamma-irradiation on ductus thoracicus lymphocytes of the rat. In Flow Cytometry IV, Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 293–295.
   Google Scholar
• Steinkamp JA, Wilson JS: Flow cytometric analysis of exfoliated respiratory tract cell exposed to environmental pollutants. In Flow Cytometry IV, Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 314–316.
   Google Scholar
• Otto Fl, Oldiges H, Gôhde W, et al: Flow cytornetric measurement of nuclear DNA content variations as a potential in vivo mutagenicity test. Cytometry 2:189–191, 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Staiano-Coico L, Darzynkiewicz Z, Melamed MR, et al: Changes in DNA content of human blood mononuclear cells with senescence. Cytometry 3:79–83, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joswig E, Joswig-Priewe H: Influence of irradiation on the proliferation pattern of Hela cells in tissue cultures. ln Pulse Cytophotometry, Haanen CAM, Hillen HFP, WesseIs lMC, Eds: European Press, Ghent, 1975, pp 153–160.
   Google Scholar
• Otto F, Gôhde W: Effects of fast neutrons and x-ray irradiation on cell kinetics, In Pulse Cytophotometry, Gôhde W, Schumann J, Buchner T, Eds: European Press, Ghent, 1976, pp 244–249.
   Google Scholar
• Lindmo T, Steen HB, Pettersen EO: Cell cycle progression after x-ray irradiation of synchronized populations of NHIK 3025 cells. In Pulse Cytophotometry, Lutz D, Ed: European Press, Ghent, 1978, pp 303–310.
   Google Scholar
• Baisch H, Bohmer R-M: Effect of internai radiation of tritiated BUdR incorporated into DNA on the progression of cells through the cycle. In Flow Cytometry IV, Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 359–361.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack A, Bagwell CB, Hudson JL, et al: Differences in flow cytometry and 3H-thymidine analysis of perturbed human lymphocytes. J Histochem Cytochem 27:486–490, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staiano-Coico L, Darzynkiewiez Z, Hefton JH, et al: Increased sensitivity of lymphocytes from people over 65 to cell cycle arrest and chromosomal damage. Science 219:1335–1337, 1983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farsund T: Disturbances of growth and polyploidy in mouse bladder epithelium by systemic injection of toxie and carcinogenic substances. In Flow Cytometry IV, Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 304–306.
   Google Scholar
• Clausen OPF: Cell cycle traverse monitored by pulse cytophotometry of epidermal basal cells stimulated to proliferate by a carcinogenic and a noncarcinogenic skin irritant. In Pulse Cytophotometry, Lutz D, Ed: European Press, Ghent, 1978, pp 351–358.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker RM: Cell cycle dependency of tumor promotor on murine erythroleukemia cells. Cytometry 1: 373-376, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Astrup EG: The kinetie response of the mouse epidermis to a single topical application of TPA (l2-0-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate). In Flow Cytometry IV, Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 307–310.
   Google Scholar
• Harms H, Aus HM, ter Meulen V: Cytophotometric analysis of Iytically and persistently infected tissue culture cells with measles virus. Cytometry 1:351–357, 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gershey EL: SV40-infected Muntjac cells: Cell cycle kinetics, cell ploidy and T antigen concentration. Cytometry 1:49–56, 1980.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cram LS, Gomez ER, Thoen CO, et al: Flow microfluorometric quantitation of the blastogenie response of lymphocytes. J Histochem Cytochem 24:383–387, 1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalande ME, Miller RG: Fluorescence flow analysis of lymphocyte activation using Hoechst 33342 dye. J Histochem Cytochem 27:394–397, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traganos F, Gorski AJ, Darzynkiewicz Z, et al: Rapid multiparameter analysis of cell stimulation in mixed lymphocyte culture reactions. J Histochem Cytochem 25:881–887, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunstein JD, Melamed MR, Darzynkiewiez Z, et al: Quantitation of transformed lymphocytes by flow cytofluorometry. I. Phytohemmagglutinin response. Clin Immunol 4:209–215, 1975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunstein JD, Good RA, Hansen JA, et al: Quantitation of lymphocyte response to antigen by flow cytofluorometry. J Histochem Cytochem 24:378–382, 1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betel I, Van Der Westen G: Cytofluorographie multiparameter analysis of mitogen induced activation and proliferation of mouse thymocytes. In Pulse Cytophotometry, Lutz D, Ed: European Press, Ghent, 1978, pp 289–296.
   Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewiez Z, Traganos F, Sharpless TK, et al: CeU cycle related changes in nuclear chromatin of stimulated lymphocytes as measured by flow cytometry. Cancer Res 37:4635–4640, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Andreeff M, et al: Different sensitivity of chromatin to acid denaturation in quiescent and cycling cells as revealed by flow cytornetry, J Histochem Cytochem 27: 478-485, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker RM, Wu Në, Mitrani A, et al: Cell volume decrease during Friend leukemia cell differentiation. J Histochem Cytochem 27:413–416, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker RM, Whittington K, Priee BJ: Differentiation of HL-60 cells, CeU volume and cell cycle changes. Cytometry 3:414–418, 1983.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arndt-Jovin D, Ostertag W, Eisen H, et al: Studies of cellular differentiation by automated cell separation. Two model systems: Friend-virus-transformed cells and Hydra attenuata. J Histochem Cytochem 24: 332-347, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Arndt-Jovin DJ: Cellular differentiation. In Flow Cytometry and Sorting, Melamed MR, Mullaney PF, Mendelsohn ML, Eds: John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979, pp 453–470.
   Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Sharpless T, et al: Nuclear chromatin changes during erythroid differentiation of Friend virus induced leukemie cells. Exp Cell Res 99:301–309, 1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dilla MA, Gray JW, Carrano AV, et al: New directions for Ilow cytometry: Chromosome analysis. In Pulse Cytophotometry, Gôhde W, Schumann J, Buchner T, Eds: European Press, Ghent, 1976, pp 57–62.
   Google Scholar
• Carrano AV, Van Dilla MA, Gray JW: Flow cytogenetics: A new approach to chromosome analysis. In Flow Cytometry and Sorting, Melamed MR, Mullaney PF, Mendelsohn ML, Eds: John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979, pp 421–451.
   Google Scholar
• Carrano AV, Gray JW, Van Dilla MA: Flow cytogenetics: Progress toward chromosomal aberration detection. In Mutagen Induced Chromosome Damage in Man, Evans HJ, Lloyd DC, Eds: Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 1978, pp 326–338.
   Google Scholar
• Otto F, Oldiges H: Requirements and procedures for chromosomal DNA measurements for rapid karyotype analysis in mammalian cells. In Pulse Cytophotometry, Lutz D, Ed: European Press, Ghent, 1976, pp 393–400.
   Google Scholar
• Matsson P, Rydburg B: Analysis of chromosomes from human peripheral lymphocytes by flow cytometry. Cytometry 1:369–372, 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cram LS, Wilder M, Bartholdi M, et al: Spontaneous transformation: Development of a model system-preliminary flow karotype analysis. Cytometry 2:93, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholdi MF, Sinclair DC, Cram LS: Chromosome analysis by high illumination flow cytometry. Cytometry 3:395–401, 1983.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Latt SA, Sahar E, Eisenhard ME: Pairs of fluorescent dyes as probes of DNA and chromosomes. J Histochem Cytochem 27:65–71, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latt SA, Sahar E, Eisenhard ME, et al: Interactions between pairs of DNA-binding dyes: Results and implications for chromosome analysis. Cytometry 1:2–12, 1980.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray JW, Langlois RG, Carrano AV, et al: High resolution chromosome analysis: One and two parameter flow cytometry. Chromosoma 73:9–27, 1979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremer C, Gray JW: Replication kinetics of Chinese hamster chromosomes as revealed by bivariate flow karyotyping. Cytometry 3:282–286, 1983.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Otto PJ, 01diges H: Flow cytometric studies in chromosomes and whole cells for the detection of clastogenic effects. Cytometry 1:13–17, 1980.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cremer C, Cremer T, Gray JW: Induction of chromosome damage by ultraviolet light and caffeine: Correlation of cytogenetic evaluation and flow karyotype. Cytometry 2:287–290, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Disteche CM, Kunkel LM, Lojewski A, et al: Isolation of mouse X-chromosome specifie DNA l'rom an X-enriched lambda phage library derived from flow sorted chromosomes. Cytometry 2:282;-286, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Pantes JA, Green DK, Cook HJ: Purifying human Y chromosomes by flow cytometry and sorting. Cytometry 4:88–91, 1983.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geraedts JPM, Van der Ploeg M: DNA measurements of chromosome 9 and 22 of six patients with t(9;22) and chronic myeloid leukemia. Cytometry 1:152–155, 1980.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray JW, Peters D, Merrill JT, et al: Slit scan-flow cytometry of mammalian chromosomes. J Histochem Cytochem 27:441–444, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray JW, Lucas J, Pinkel D, et al: Slit scan flow cytometry: Analysis of Chinese hamster M3-1 chromosomes. In Flow Cytometry IV, Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Vniversitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 249–255.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas JN, Gray JW, Peters DC, et al: Centromeric index measurements by slit-scan flow cytometry. Cytometry 4:109–116, 1983.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murphy RP, Daban J-R, Centor CR: Flow cytometric analysis of the nuclear division cycle of Physarum polycephalum plasmodia. Cytometry 2:26–30, 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonaly J, Mestre JC: Flow fluorometric study of DNA content in nonproliferative Euglena gracilis cells and during proliferation. Cytometry 2:35–38, 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paau AS, Cowles JR, Oro J: Flow microfluorometric analysis of Escherichia coli, Rhizobium meliloti, and Rhizobium japonicum at different stages in the growth cycle. Can J Microbiol 23:1165–1169, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paau AS, Lee D, Cowles JR: Comparison of nucleic acid content in free-living and symbiotic Rhizobium meliloti by flow microfluorometry. J Bacteriol 129:1156–1158, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey JE, Fazel-Madjlessi J, McQuitty DN, et al: Characterization of bacterial growth by means of flow microfluorometry. Science 198:1175–1176, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen HB, Boye E: Bacterial growth studied by flow cytometry. Cytometry 1:32–36, 1980.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martinez OV, Gratzner HG, Malinin TI, et al: The effect of sorne beta-lactam antibiotics on Escherichia coli studied by flow cytometry. Cytometry 3:129–133, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steen HB, Boye E, Skarstad K, et al: Applications of flow cytometry on bacteria: Cell cycle kinetics, drug effects, and quantitation of antibody binding. Cytometry 2:249–257, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agar DW, Bailey JE: Cell cycle operation during batch growth of fission yeast populations. Cytometry 3:123–128, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nowell PC: Chromosome changes and the clonaI evaluation of cancer. In Chromosomes and Cancer, German J, Ed: John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1974, pp 267–285.
   Google Scholar
• Petrakis NL: Microspectrophotometric estimation of the desoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) content of individual normal and leukemic human lymphocytes. Blood 8: 905-915, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Barlogie B, Drewinko B, Schumann J, et al: Cellular DNA content as a marker of neoplasia in man. Am J Med 69:195–203, 1980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlogie B, Gôhde W, Johnston DA, et al: Determination of ploidy and proliferative characteristics of human solid tumors by pulse cytophotometry. Cancer Res 38:3333–3339, 1978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein PA, Herr HW, Whitmore WF Jr, et al: An evaluation of automated flow cytometry (FCM) in detection of carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder. Cancer 50:1003–1008, 1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collste LG, Devonec M, Darzynkiewicz Z, et al: Bladder cancer diagnosis by flow cytometry. Correlation between cell samples l'rom biopsy and bladder irrigation fluid. Cancer 45:2389–2394, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Collste LG, Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos P, et al: Flow cytometry in bladder cancer detection and evaluation using acridine orange metachromatic nucleic acid staining of irrigation cytology specimens. J Urol 123:478-485.. 1980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collste LG, Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos P, et al: CeIl-cycle distribution of urothelial tumor cells as measured by flow cytometry. Br J Cancer 40:872–877, 1980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein FA, Herr HW, Sogani PC, et al: Detection and followup of carcinoma of the urinary bladder by flow cytometry. Cancer 50:389–395, 1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olszewski W, Darzynkiewicz Z, Rosen PP, et al: Flow cytometry of breast carcinoma. 1. Relation of DNA ploidy level to histology and estrogen receptor. Cancer 48:980–984, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Olszewski W, Darzynkiewicz Z, Claps ML, et al: Flow cytometry of lung carcinoma. A comparison of DNA stemline and cell cycle distribution with histology. Anal Quant Cytol 4:90–94, 1982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreeff M, Darzynkiewicz Z, Sharpless T, et al: Discrimination of human leukemia subtypes by flow cytometric analysis of cellular DNA and RNA. Blood 55:282–293, 1980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreeff M, Darzynkiewicz Z, Steinmetz J, et al: Chromatin structure and nucleic acid content determined in situ by flow cytometry (FC) in acute leukemia. Blood 58 (Suppl): 127a, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Andreeff M, Gee T, Mertelsmann R, et al: Biclonal lymphoblastic and myeloblastic acute leukemias. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 21:54, 1980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreeff M, Melamed MR, Miller D, et al: Near-haploid acute Iymphoblastic leukemia: Poor prognosis subgroup identified and monitored by flow cytometry. Cytometry 2:282–293, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Blick MB, BarJogie B, Hagemeister P, et al: Cytometry of malignant lymphoma: Comparison with histopathology and prognostic implications. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 24: 127, 1983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latreille J, Barlogie B, Johnston DA, et al: Ploidy and proliferative characteristics in monoclonal gammopathies. Blood 59:43–51, 1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackney SE, Skramstad KS, Cunningham RE, et al: Dual parameter flow cytometry studies in human Iymphomas. J Clin Invest 66:1281–1294, 1980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett DL, Jensen RH, King EB, et al: Flow cytometry of human gynecologie specimens using log chromomycin A3 fluorescence and log 90° light scatter signais. J Histochem Cytochem 27:573–578, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raber MN, Barlogie B, Latreille J, et al: Acridine orange fluorescence after acid denaturation of cellular DNA. Basic Appl Histochem 24:385, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Barlogie B, Maddox AM, Johnston D, et al: Quantitative cytology in leukemia research. Blood Cells, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Loken MR, Stout RD, Herzenberg LA: Lymphoid cell analysis and sorting. In Flow Cytometry and Sorting, Melamed MR, Mullaney PF, Mendelsohn ML, Eds: John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979, pp 505–528.
   Google Scholar
• Vyth-Dreese FA, Kipp JBA, DeJong TAM: Simultaneous measurement of surface immunoglobulins and cell cycle phase of human lymphocytes. In Flow Cytometry IV, Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 207–212.
   Google Scholar
• Zeile G: Intracytoplasmic immunofluoresence in multiple mye\oma. Cytometry 1: 37-41, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Winchester RJ, Fu SM, Hoffman T, et al: IgG on lymphocyte surfaces; technical problems and the significance of a third population. J Immunol 114:1210–1212, 1975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loken MR, Herzenberg LA: Analysis of cell populations with a fluorescence activated cell sorter. Ann NY Acad Sei 254:263–271, 1975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loken MR, Sweet RG, Herzenberg LA: Cell discrimination by multiangle light scattering. J Histochem Cytochem 24:284–291, 1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loken MR, Leibson PJ, Schreiber H: Cell cycle variation in sensitivity to antibody and complement. In Flow Cytometry IV, Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 203–206.
   Google Scholar
• Jett JH, Stevenson AP, Wamer NL, et al: Quantitation of cell surface antigen density by flow cytometry. In Flow Cytometry IV, Laerum OD, Lindmo T, Thorud E, Eds: Univesitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1979, pp 215–221.
   Google Scholar
• Steinkamp JA, Kraemer PM: Quantitation of lectin binding by cells. In Flow Cytometry and Sorting, Melamed MR, Mullaney PF, Mendelsohn ML, Eds: John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979, pp 497–504.
   Google Scholar
• Kraemer PM, Tobey RA, Van Dilla MA: Flow microf1uorometric studies on lectin binding to mammalian cells. 1. General features. J Cell Physiol 81: 305-313, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Sklar LA, Finney DA: Analysis of ligand-receptor interactions with the fluorescence activated cell sorter. Cytometry 3:161–165, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leary JF, Todd P: Laser cytophotometric detection of variations in spatial distribution of conconavalin-A cell surface receptors following viral infection. J Histochem Cytochem 25:908–912, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy RF, Powers S, Verderame M, et al: Flow cytofluorometric analysis of insulin binding and internalization by Swiss 3T3 cells. Cytometry 2:402–406, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finney DA, Sklar LA: Ligand/receptor intemalization: A kinetic flow cytometric analysis of the intemalization of Nformyl peptides by human neutrophils. Cytometry 4:54–60, 1983.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kohler G, Milstein C: Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature (London) 256:495–497, 1975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foon KA, Schroff RW, Gale RP: Surface markers on leukemia and Iymphoma cells: Recent advances. Blood 60:1–19, 1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger RS, Borowitz MJ, Jones NH, et al: Distribution of common acute Iymphoblastic leukemia antigen in nonhematopoietic tissues. J Exp Med 154:1249–1254, 1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield CD, Gajl-Peczalska KJ, Frizzera G: Clinical utility of lymphocyte surface markers combined with the Lukes-Collins histologie classification in adult Iymphoma. N Engl J Med 301:512–518, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ault KA: Detection of small numbers of monoclonal B lymphocytes in the blood of patients with lymphoma. N Engl J Med 300:1401-1405, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Miller RA, Maloney DG, McKillop J, et al: In vivo effects of murine hybridoma monoclonal antibody in a patient with TCLL leukemia. Blood 58:78–86, 1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritz J, Sallan SE, Bast RC, et al: Autologous bone marrow transplantation in cALLA positive ALL following in vitro treatment with J5 monoclonal antibody and complement. Blood 58:175a, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Fradet Y, Cordon-Cordo C, Thompson T, et al: Cell surface antigens of human bladder cancer defined by mouse monoclonal antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sei USA 81:224–228, 1984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badaracco G, Corsi A, Maisto A, et al: Expression of tumorassociated antigens and kinetics profile of two in vitro human melanoma cell lines. Cytometry 2:63–69, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Bizzaro MD, Drewinko B, Barlogie B, et al: Flow cytometric measurements of intracellular CEA with monoclonal antibodies. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 23:32, 1982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight WA, Livingston RB, Gregory EJ, et al: Estrogen receptor as an independent prognostic factor for early recurrence in breast cancer. Cancer Res 37:4669–4671, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raber MN, Barlogie B, Van NT, et al: Flow cytometric measurement of estrogen receptor content. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 23:32, 1982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raber MN, Barlogie B, Latreille J, et al: Ploidy, proliferative activity and estrogen receptor content in human breast cancer. Cytometry 3:36–41, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kute TE, Linville C, Barrows G: Cytofluorometric analysis for estrogen receptors using fluorescent estrogen probes. Cytometry 4:132–140, 1983.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szabo G, Toth FD, Rethy A: Cell surface antigens reacting with antiretrovirus sera in normal mouse spleen cells: A flow cytometric study. Cytometry 4:47–53, 1983.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ingram M, Cleary Tl, Priee BJ, et al: Rapid detection of legionella pneumophilia by flow cytometry. Cytometry 3:134–137, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fried J, Doblin J, Takamoto S, et al: Effects of Hoechst 33342 on survival and growth of two tumor cell lines and on hematopoietically normal bone marrow cells. Cytometry 3:42–47, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Zant G, Fray CG: Hoechst 33342 staining of mouse bone marrow: Effects on colony-forming cells. Cytometry 4:40–46, 1983.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loken MR, Parks DR, Herzenberg LA: Two-color immunofluorescence using a f1uorescence-activated cell sorter. J Histochem Cytochem 25:899–907, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin CL, Rolland lM, Naim RC, et al: Selection of optical filters for laser flow cytometry using fluorescence conjugates. Cytometry 2:374–382, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharpless TK, Bartholdi M, Melamed MR: Size and refractive index dependence of simple forward angle scattering measurements in a flow system using sharply-focused illumination. J Histochem Cytochem 25:845–856, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loken MR, Parks DR, Herzenberg LA: Identification of cell asymmetry and orientation by light scattering. J Histochem Cytochem 25:790–795, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerker M: Elastic and inelastic light scattering in flow cytometry. Cytometry 4:1–10, 1983.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacDonald HR, Zaech P: Lightscatter analysis and sorting of celis activated In mixed leukocyte culture. Cytometry 3:55–58, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neilsen O, Larsen JK, Christensen IT, et al: Flow sorting of mouse pancreatic B cells by forward and orthogonal light scattering. Cytometry 3:177–181, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hercher M, Mueller W, Shapiro H: Detection and discrimination of individual viruses by flow cytometry. J Histochem Cytochem 27:350–352, 1979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinkamp JA, Hansen KM, Crissman HA: Flow microfluorometric and light scatter measurement of nuclear and cytoplasmic size in mammalian cells. J Histochem Cytochem 24:292–297, 1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe JG, Havran WL, Cambier JC: Enrichment of viable lymphocytes in defined cycle phases by sorting on the basis of pulse width of axial light extinction. Cytometry 3:24–27, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mullaney PF, Crowell JM, Salzman GC, et al: Pulse-height light-scatter distributions using flow-systems instrumentation. J Histochem Cytochem 24:298–304, 1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullaney PF, Crowell JM, Salzman GC, et al: Multiangle light scalter mcasuring methods for mammalian cell detection and identification. In Pulse Cytophotometry, Gôhde W, Schumann J, Buchner T, Eds: European Press, Ghent, 1976, pp 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Salzman GC, Burger DE, Bartholdi M, et al: Flow-system multiangle light scattering studies; A progress report. In Pulse Cytophotometry, Lutz D, Ed: European Press, Ghent, 1976, pp 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer IA, Jamieson AM, Petrelli M, et al: Multiangle light scattering flow photometry of cultured human fibroblasts: Comparison of normal cells with a mutant line containing cytoplasmic inclusions. J Histochem Cytochem 27:359–365, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartzendruber DE, Priee BJ, Rail LB: Multiangle light scattering analysis of murine teratocarcinoma cells. J Histochem Cytochem 27:366–370, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzman GC, Crowell JM, Hansen KM, et al: Gynecologie specimen analysis by multiangle light scattering in a flow system. J Histochem Cytochem 24:308–314, 1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otten GR, Loken MR: Two color light scattering identifies physical differences between lymphocyte subpopulations. Cytometry 3:182–187, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein M, Norman A, Pinkel D, et al: Flow system fluorescence polarization measurements on fluorecein diacetate stained EL4 cells. J Histochem Cytochem 25:821–826, 1977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udkoff R, Norman A: Polarization of fluorescein fluorescence in single cells. J Histochem Cytochem 27:49–55, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udkoff R, Chan S, Norman A: Identification of mitogen responding lymphocytes by fluorescence polarization. Cytometry 1:265–271, 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cram LS, Amdt-Jovin DJ, Grimwald G, et al: Fluorescence polarization and pulse width analysis of chromosomes by a flow system. J Histochem Cytochem 27:445–453, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplow LS: Leukocyte peroxidase and nonspecific esterase. ln Flow Cytometry and Sorting, Melamed MR, Mullaney PF, Mendelsohn ML, Eds: John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979, pp 531–545.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplow LS, Dauber H, Lemer E: Assessment of monocyte esterase activity by flow cytophotometry. J Histochem Cytochem 24:363–372, 1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderlaan M, Cutter C, Dolbeare F: Flow microfluorometric identification of liver cells with elevated gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase activity after carcinogen exposure. J Histochem Cytochem 27: 114–119, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolbeare FA, Phares W: Napthol AS-B 1 phosphatese and napthol AS-BI beta-D-glucuronidase in Chinese hamster ovary cells: Biochemical and flow cytometric studies. J Histochem Cytochem 27:120–124, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo KW, Tsou KC: Cell cycle and 5-nucleotide phosphodiesterase activities in rat liver. Cytometry 2:414–420, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watson JV: Enzyme kinetic studies in cell populations using fluorogenic substrates and flow cytometric techniques. Cytometry 1:143–151, 1980.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malin-Berdel J, Valet G: Flow cytometric determination of esterase and phosphatase activities and kinetics in hematopoietic cells with fluorogenic substrates. Cytometry 1:222–228, 1980.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aubin JE: Autofluorescence of viable cultured mammalian cells. J Histochem Cytochem 27:36–43, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Benson RC, Meyer RA, Zaruba ME, et al: Cellular autofluorescence-Is it due to flavins? J Histochem Cytochem 27:44–48, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt SM, Burgess AW, Metcalf D, et al: Isolation of mouse bone marrow neutrophils by light scatter and autofluorescence. J Histochem Cytochem 28:934–946, 1980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weil GJ, Chused TM: Eosinophil autofluorescence and its use in isolation and analysis of human eosinophils using flow microfluorometry. Blood 57: 1099–1104, 1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorell B: Flow cytometric analysis of cellular endogenous fluorescence simultaneously with emission from exogenous fluorochromes, light scatter and absorption. Cytometry 2:39–43, 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thorell B: Flow cytometric monitoring of intracellular flavins simultaneously with NAD(P)H levels. Cytometry 4: 61-65, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Trask BJ, van den Engh GJ, Eigershuizen JHBW: Analysis of phytoplankton by flow cytometry. Cytometry 2:258–264, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shapiro HM: Multistation multiparameter flow cytometry: A critical review and rationale. Cytometry 3: 227-243, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro HM: Flow cytometric probes of early events in cell activation. Cytometry 1: 301-312, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro HM, Natale PJ, Kamentsky LA: Estimation of membrane potential of individual lymphocytes by flow cytometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5728–5730, 1979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Staiano-Coico L, Melamed MR: Increased mitochondrial uptake of rhodamine 123 during lymphocyte stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sei USA 78:2383–2387, 1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson R, Macara IG, Smith RL, et al: Role of mitochondrial membrane potential in the regulation of murine erthryoleukemia cell differentiation. Cell 28:855–863, 1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evenson OP, Darzynkiewicz Z, Melamed MR: Simultaneous measurement by flow cytometry of sperm viability and mitochrondrial membrane potential related to cell motility. J Histochem Cytochem 30:279–280, 1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Staiano-Coico L, et al: Interactions of rhodamine 123 with living cells studied by flow cytometry. Cancer Res 42:799–806, 1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapiero H, Fourcade A, Vaigot P, et al: Comparative uptake of adriamycin and daunorubicin in sensitive and resistant Friend leukemia cells measured by flow cytometry. Cytometry 2:298–302, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szabo G, Kiss A, Damjanovich S: Flow cytometric analysis of the uptake of Hoechst 33342 dye by human lymphocytes. Cytometry 2:20–23, 1981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parry G, Blenis J, Hawkes SP: Detection of transformed cells using a fluorescent probe: The molecular basisfor the differential reaction of fluorescamine with normal and transformed cells. Cytometry 3:97–103, 1982.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olive PL, Biaglow JE, Varnes ME, et al: Characterization of the uptake and toxicity of a fluorescent thiol reagent. Cytometry 3:349–353, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Melamed MR, Adams LR, Zimring A, et al: Preliminary evaluation of acridine orange as a vital stain for automated diffferentiation leukocyte counts. Am J Clin Pathol 57:95–102, 1972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melamed MR, Adams LR, Traganos F, et al: Acridine orange metachromasia for characterization of leukocytes in leukemia, lymphoma, and other neoplasms. Cancer 29:1361–1368, 1972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melamed MR, Adams LR, Traganos F, et al: Initial observations on instrumental differential blood leukocyte counts during chemotherapy of patients with leukemia. Eur J Cancer 9:181–184, 1973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melamed MR, Adams LR, Traganos F, et al: Blood granulocyte staining with acridine orange: Changes with infection. J Histochem Cytochem 22:526–530, 1974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar