Do different circadian typology measures modulate their relationship with personality? A test using the Alternative Five Factor Model

References

• Adan A, Almirall H. (1991). Horne and Östberg morningness-eveningness questionnaire: A reduced scale. Pers Individ Dif. 12:241–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adan A, Archer SN, Hidalgo MP, et al. (2012). Circadian typology: A comprehensive review. Chronobiol Int. 29:1153–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adan A, Caci H, Prat G. (2005). Reliability of the Spanish version of the Composite Scale of Morningness. Eur Psychiatr. 20:503–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adan A, Lachica J, Caci H, Natale V. (2010a). Circadian typology and temperament and character personality dimensions. Chronobiol Int. 27:181–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adan A, Natale V, Caci H, Prat G. (2010b). Relationship between circadian typology and functional and dysfunctional impulsivity. Chronobiol Int. 27:606–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzani A, Natale V. (1998). Uno strumento per la valutazione delle differenze individuali nei ritmi circadiani: Una versione italiana della composite scale of morningness [A questionnaire to determine individual differences in human circadian rhythms: An italian version of Composite Scale of Morningness]. Test Psicometr Metodol. 5:19–31
   Google Scholar
• Antúnez JM, Navarro JF, Adan A. (2014). Morningness-eveningness and personality characteristics of young healthy adults. Pers Individ Dif. 68:136–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay NL, Eley TC, Mill J, et al. (2011). Sleep quality and diurnal preference in a sample of young adults: Association with 5HTTLPR, PER3, and CLOCK 3111. Am J Med Genet B. 156:681–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caci H, Deschaux O, Adan A, Natale V. (2009). Comparing three morningness scales: Age and gender effects, structure and cut-off criteria. Sleep Med. 10:240–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caci H, Robert P, Boyer P. (2004). Novelty seekers and impulsive subjects are low in morningness. Eur Psychiatry. 19:79–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloninger CR, Przybeck, TR, Svrakic, DM. (1994). The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): A guide to its development and use. St. Louis, MO: Center for Psychobiology of Personality, Washington University
   Google Scholar
• Costa PT, McCrae RR. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Pers Individ Dif. 13:653–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Pascalis V, Russo P. (2003). Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire: Preliminary results of the Italian version. Psychol Rep. 92:965–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Milia L, Adan A, Natale V, Randler C. (2013). Reviewing the psychometric properties of contemporary circadian typology measures. Chronobiol Int. 30:1261–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Morales JF, Ferrari JR, Cohen JR. (2008). Indecision and avoidant procrastination: The role of morningness—eveningness and time perspective in chronic delay lifestyles. J Gen Psychol. 135:228–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck HJ. (1991). Dimensions of personality: 16, 5 or 3? – Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Pers Individ Dif. 12:773–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck HJ. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Pers Individ Dif. 13:667–73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson CJ. (2009). Is psychological research really as good as medical research? Effect size comparisons between psychology and medicine. Rev Gen Psychol. 13:130–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomà-i-Freixanet M, Valero S, Muro A, Albiol S. (2008). Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire: Psychometric properties in a general population sample. Psychol Rep. 103:845–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomà-i-Freixanet M, Valero S, Puntí J, Zuckerman M. (2004). Psychometric properties of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire in a Spanish sample. Eur J Psychol Assess. 20:134–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomà-i-Freixanet M, Valero S. (2008). Spanish normative data of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ) in a general population sample. Psicothema 20:324–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomà-i-Freixanet M, Wismeijer AAJ, Valero S. (2005). Consensual validity parameters of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire: Evidence from self-reports and spouse reports. J Pers Assess. 84:279–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray JA. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood KM. (1994). Long-term stability and psychometric properties of the Composite Scale of Morningness. Ergonomics. 37:377–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne JA, Östberg O. (1976). A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. Int J Chronobiol. 4:97–110
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leonhard C, Randler C. (2009). In sync with the family: Children and partners influence the sleep-wake circadian rhythm and social habits of women. Chronobiol Int. 26:510–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muro A, Gomà-i-Freixanet M, Adan A, Cladellas R. (2011). Circadian typology, age, and the alternative five-factor personality model in an adult women sample. Chronobiol Int. 28:690–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muro A, Gomà-i-Freixanet M, Adan A. (2009). Morningness-eveningness, gender, and the Alternative Five Factor Model of Personality. Chronobiol Int. 26:1235–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojeda DA, Perea CS, Niño CL, et al. (2013). A novel association of two non-synonymous polymorphisms in Per2 and Per3 genes with specific diurnal preference subscales. Neurosci Lett. 553: 52–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostendorf F, Angleitner A. (1994). A comparison of different instruments proposed to measure the Big Five. Eur Rev Appl Psychol. 44:45–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portaluppi F, Smolensky MH, Touitou Y. (2010). Ethics and methods for biological rhythm research on animals and human beings. Chronobiol Int. 27:1911–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prat G, Adan A. (2013). Relationships among circadian typology, psychological symptoms and sensation seeking. Chronobiol Int. 30:942–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos-Grille I, Gomà-i-Freixanet M, Aragay N, et al. (2013). The role of personality in the prediction of treatment outcome in pathological gamblers: A follow-up study. Psychol Assess. 25:599–605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C, Baumann VP, Horzum MB. (2014). Morningness-eveningness, Big Five and the BIS/BAS inventory. Pers Individ Dif. 66:64–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C, Bilger S, Díaz–Morales JF. (2009). Association between sleep, chronotype, parental monitoring and pubertal development in German adolescents. J Psychol. 143:509–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C. (2008a). Psychometric properties of the German version of the Composite Scale of Morningness. Biol Rhythm Res. 39:151–61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C. (2013). German version of the reduced Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire (rMEQ). Biol Rhythm Res. 44:730–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler, C. (2009). Proactive people are morning people. J Appl Soc Psychol. 39: 2787–97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roenneberg T, Kuehnle T, Juda M, et al. (2007). Epidemiology of the human circadian clock. Sleep Med Rev. 11:429–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinomiya H, Takeuchi H, Martoni M, et al. (2004). Comparative study on circadian typology of Japanese and Italian students aged 12–18 years. Sleep Biol Rhythms. 2:93–5
   Google Scholar
• Smith C, Reilly C, Midkiff K. (1989). Evaluation of three circadian rhythm questionnaires with suggestions for an improved measure of morningness. J Appl Psychol. 74:728–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonetti L, Adan A, Caci H, et al. (2010). Morningness-eveningness preference and sensation seeking. Eur Psychiatry. 25:111–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaousis I. (2010). Circadian preferences and personality traits: A meta-analysis. Eur J Pers. 24:356–73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valero S, Daigre C, Rodríguez-Cintas L, et al. (2014). Neuroticism and impulsivity: Their hierarchical organization in the personality characterization of drug-dependent patients from a decision tree learning perspective. Compr Psychiat. 55:1227–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valero S, Ramos-Quiroga A, Goma-i-Feixanet M, et al. (2012). Personality profile of adult ADHD: The alternative five factor model. Psychiatr Res. 198:130–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman M, Kuhlman DM, Joireman J, et al. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The big three, the big five, and the alternative five. J Pers Soc Psychol. 65:757–68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman M. (2002). Zuckerman–Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ): An alternative five-factorial model. In De Raad B, Perugini M, eds. Big five assessment. Seattle: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers, pp. 377–96
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman M. (2005). Psychobiology of personality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar