The Use of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Methods with Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities: A Research Review

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1991). Report: Augmentative and alternative communication. ASHA, 33, 9–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson, A. (2001). Augmentative communication and autism: A comparison of sign language and the Picture Exchange Communication System. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., Mirenda (2005). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (3rd edn). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Charlop-Christy, M., Carpenter, M., Loc, L., LeBlanc, L., Kellet, K. (2002). Using the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) with children with autism: Assessment of PECS acquisition, speech, social-communicative behavior and problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 213–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, D., Klein, D., Haney, M. (2007). Promoting interactions with infants who have complex multiple disabilities: Development and field-testing of the PLAI curriculum. Infants & Young Children: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Special Care Practices, 20, 149–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for behavioral analysis. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cress, C., Marvin, C. (2003). Common questions about AAC services in early intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 254–272.
   Google Scholar
• DiCarlo, C., Stricklin, S., Banajee, M., Reid, D. (2001). Effects of manual signing on communicative verbalizations by toddlers with and without disabilities in inclusive classrooms. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 120–126.
   Google Scholar
• Drager, K. D. R., Light, J. C., Speltz, J. C., Fallon, K. A., Jeffries, L. Z. (2003). The performance of typically developing 2 1/2-year-olds on dynamic display AAC technologies with different system layouts and language organizations. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 298–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugan, L., Campbell, P., Wilcox, M. (2006). Making decisions about assistive technology with infants and toddlers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26, 25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fey, M., Warren, S., Brady, N., Finestack, L., Bedin-Oja, S., Fairchild, M., Sokol, S., Yoder, P. (2006). Early effects of Responsivity Education/Prelinguistic Milieu Teaching for children with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research, 49, 526–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (2002). Communication intervention for children with autism: A review of treatment efficacy. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 32, 373–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., Duncum, J. (1995). Comparison of sign alone and in combination with an electronic communicataion device in early language intervention: Case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 249–259.
   Google Scholar
• Kouri, T. (1988). Effects of simultaneous communication in a child-directed treatment approach with preschoolers with severe disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 222–232.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative competence by individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 137–144.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K. (2007). AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 204–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (2003). Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism: Manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 203–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Scientific Council on the Developing Child (2007). The timing and quality of early experiences combine to shape brain architecture: Working Paper #5. Retrieved 12 February 2009 from: http://www.developingchild.net
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, L., McConachie, H. (1999). Mother-child interaction revisited: Communication with non-speaking physically disabled children. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 34, 391–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P. (2000). Evidence-based practice: Where are we in AAC? Paper presented at the 9th biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M., Sevcik, R. (2005). Augmentative communication and early intervention: Myths and realities. Infants & Young Children: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Special Care Practices, 18, 174–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M., Sevcik, R., Adamson, L., Smith, A., Cheslock, M. (2006). Toddlers, parent-implemented augmented language interventions,and communication development. Paper presented at the 12th biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Dusseldorf, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Sameroff, A., Fiese, B. (2000). Transactional regulation: The developmental ecology of early intervention. In J. Shonkoff, S. Meisels (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (2nd edn, pp. 135–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. (2003). Roles of speech output in augmentative and alternative communication: Narrative review. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 19, 5–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlosser, R., Koul, R., Costello, J. (2007). Asking well-built questions for evidence-based practice in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Communication Disorders, 40, 225–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R., Lee, D. (2000). Promoting generalization and maintenance in augmentative and alternative communication: A meta-analysis of 20 years of effectiveness research. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 16, 208–226.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R., Raghavendra, P. (2004). Evidence-based practice in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 20, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R., Wendt, O., Angermeier, K., Shetty, M. (2005). Searching for evidence in augmentative and alternative communication: Navigating a scattered literature. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 233–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T., Mastropieri, M., Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative analysis of single subject research methodology: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T., Mastropieri, M., Cook, S., Escobar, C. (1986). Early intervention for children with conduct disorders: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Behavioral Disorders, Volume 8. 260–270.
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., Didden, R., Schlosser, R., Green, V., O'Reilly, M., Lancioni, G. (2008). A review of intervention studies on teaching AAC to individuals who are deaf and blind. Journal of Physical Disabilities, 20, 71–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. (1986). Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analysis and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher, 15, 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Sprinthall, R. (2003). Basic statistical analysis (7th edn). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, K., Sigafoos, J., Woodyatts, G., O'Reilly, M., Lancioni, G. (2004). Evaluating parent use of functional communication training to replace and enhance prelinguistic behaviours in six children with developmental and physical disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: An International, Multidisciplinary Journal, 26, 1241–1254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., Martinsen, H. (1992). Introduction to symbolic and augmentative communication. San Diego: Singular.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. (1994). Scientific communication and literature retrieval. In H. Cooper, L. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis ( pp. 42–53). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, P., Stone, W. (2006). A randomized comparison of the effect of two prelinguistic communication interventions on the acquistion of spoken communication in preschoolers with ASD. Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research, 49, 698–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, P., Warren, S. (1998). Maternal responsivity predicts the prelinguistic communication intervention that facilitates generalized intentional communication. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 41, 1207–1219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar