Factors Affecting Computer Mouse Use for Young Children: Implications for AAC

References

• AAC-RERC Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Communication Enhancement. (2011). AAC-RERC white paper on mobile devices & communication apps [White paper]. Retrieved from http://aac-rerc.psu.edu/index.php/pages/show/id/46
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Pediatrics (2003). Eye examination in infants, children, and adults by pediatricians. Pediatrics, 111, 102–107.
   Google Scholar
• Beery, K., & Beery, A. (2004). The Beery-Buktenica developmental test of visual-motor integration: Administration, scoring, and teaching manual (5th edn). Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative & alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evidence of a new paradigm. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 163–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2006). Demographics of preschoolers who require AAC. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 200–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S., Williams, M., & Wilkins, D. (2007). Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 23, 191–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonvillian, J., & Siedlecki, T. (1996). Young children’s acquisition of the location aspect of American Sign Language: Parental report findings. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29, 13–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, R. (1992). The mind’s staircase: Exploring the conceptual underpinnings of children’s thought and knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Costigan, F. A., & Newell, K. (2009). An analysis of constraints on access to augmentative communication in cerebral palsy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76, 143–161.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, C. (1992). Young children’s skill in using a mouse to control a graphical computer interface. Computers & Education, 19, 199–207.
   Google Scholar
• Dell, A. G., Newton, D. A., & Petroff, J. G. (2008). Assistive technology in the classroom: Enhancing the school experiences of students with disabilities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Donker, A., & Reitsma, P. (2007). Young children’s ability to use a computer mouse. Computers & Education, 48, 602–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erhardt, R. (1992). Eye-hand coordination. In J. Case-Smith C. Pehoski (Eds.), Development of hand skills in the child (pp. 13–27). Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
   Google Scholar
• Falkman, K., Sandberg, A., & Hjelmquist, E. (2002). Preferred communication modes: Prelinguistic and linguistic communication in non-speaking preschool children with cerebral palsy. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 37, 59–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the movement amplitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gesell, A., & Thompson, H. (1934). Infant behavior. New York: McGraw Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Hertz-Picciotto, I., & Delwiche, L. (2009). The rise in autism and the role of age at diagnosis. Epidemiology, 20, 84–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. (1995). Use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research: Confessions of a research infidel. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 11, 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hourcade, J., Bederson, B., Druin, A., & Guimbretière, F. (2004). Differences in pointing task performance between preschool children and adults using mice. ACM Transaction on Computer-Human Interaction, 11, 357–386.
   Google Scholar
• Hyvärinen, L., Näsänen, R., & Laurinen, P. (1980). New visual acuity test for pre-school children. Acta Ophthalmologica, 58, 507–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (2011). What is AAC? Retrived from http://www.isaac-online.org/english/what-is-aac.
   Google Scholar
• King, J., & Alloway, N. (1993). Young children’s use of microcomputer input devices. Computers in the Schools, 9(4), 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Kugler, P., Kelso, J., & Turvey, M. (1980). On the concept of coordinative structures as dissipative structures: 1. Theoretical lines of convergence. In G. Stelmach J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Kvarnström, G., & Jakobssen, P. (2005). Is vision screening in 3-year-old children feasible? Comparison between the Lea Symbol chart and the HVOT (LM) chart. Acta Ophthalmologica, 83, 76–80.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2007). AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 23, 204–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Lindsay, P. (1991). Cognitive science and augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 7, 186–203.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). Supporting the communication, language, and literacy development of children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research priorities. Assistive Technology, 24, 34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Lhuisset, L., & Proteau, L. (2004). Planning and control of straight ahead and angled planar movements in adults and young children. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 245–258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacKenzie, I. (1992). Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human Computer Interaction, 7, 91–139.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, I. Buxton, W. (1992). Extending Fitts’ Law to two-dimensional tasks. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’92). ACM Press, 219–226.
   Google Scholar
• Magill, R. (2001). Motor learning: Concepts and applications. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., Light, J., Drager, K., McNaughton, D., Grodzicki, L., Jones, J., …, & Parkin, E. (2006). Re-designing scanning to reduce learning demands: The performance of typically developing 2-year-olds. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 22, 269–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettenati, P. Stefanini, Volterra V. (2010) Motoric characteristics of representational gestures produced by young children in a naming task. Journal of Child Language, 37, 887–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piche, L., & Reichle, J. (1991). Teaching scanning selection techniques. In J. Reichle, J. York, & J. Sigafoos (Eds.), Implementing augmentative & alternative communication: Strategies for learners with severe disabilities (pp. 257–274). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: The same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9, 321.
   Google Scholar
• Revelle, G., & Strommen, E. (1990). The effects of practice and input device use on young children’s computer control. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 2, 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Strommen, E., Revelle, G., Medoff, L., & Razavi, S. (1996). Slow and steady wins the race? Three-year-old children and pointing device use. Behavior & Information Technology, 15, 57–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S., Newell, K., & Wade, M. (1978). Decision and response times as a function of movement difficulty in preschool children. Child Development, 49, 509–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Schmidt, A., Porter, L., Specht, J., & Gilbert, J. (2004). Assessing the use of input devices for teachers and children in early childhood education programs. Information Technology for Childhood Education Annual, 261–280.
   Google Scholar