Speaker Transfer in Children's Peer Conversation: Completing Communication-aid-mediated Contributions

References

• Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, S. (2011). Anticipatory other-completion of augmentative and alternative communication talk: A conversation analysis study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33, 261–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekke, K. M., & von Tetzchner, S. (2003). Co-construction in graphic language development. In S. von Tetzchner, & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Developmental issues. (pp. 176–210). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. T., & Kirton, A. (2003). Patterns of interaction between children with physical disabilities using augmentative and alternative communication systems and their peers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 19, 133–148.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. T., & Wilkinson, R. (2007). Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 1: Organizing and understanding VOCA use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 336–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. T., & Wilkinson, R. (2008). Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 2: Understanding initiated VOCA-mediated turns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 3–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. T., & Wilkinson, R. (2010). Communication aid use in children's conversation: Time, timing and speaker transfer. In H. Gardner & M. Forrester (Eds.), Analysing interaction in childhood: Insights from conversation analysis (pp. 249–266). London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, C. E., & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 134–184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organisation: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: New York Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, J.D. & Engleke, C. (2013). A primer for doing talk-in-interaction research in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1983). Notes on some orderliness of overlap onset. Tilberg: Department of Linguistics, Tilberg University.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1986). Notes on latency in overlap. Human Studies, 9, 153–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1989). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Roger, & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdiscplinary approach (pp. 166–196). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kraat, A. (1985). Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: A state of the art report. Toronto: Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. (1996). On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 238–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Collier, B., & Parnes, P. (1985a). Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part I – Discourse patterns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 74–83.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Collier, B., & Parnes, P. (1985b). Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part II – Communicative function. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 98–107.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Collier, B., & Parnes, P. (1985c). Communicative 
interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part III – Modes of communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 125–133.
   Google Scholar
• Local, J., & Kelly, J. (1986). Projection and “silences”: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies, 9, 185–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, E., & Soto, G. (2000). Capturing the complexity of aided interactions: A conversation analysis perspective. In S. von Tetzchner, & J. Clibbens (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Biennial Research Symposium of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (pp. 64–83). Washington, 
August.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, L., & McConachie, H. (1999). Mother-child interaction revisited: Communication with non-speaking physically disabled children. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 34, 391–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sigurd Pilesjö, M., & Rasmussen, G. (2011). Exploring interaction between a nonspeaking boy using aided augmentative and alternative communication and his everyday communication partners: Features of turn organization and turn design. Journal of Interactional Research and Communication Disorders, 2, 
183–213.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1979). The relevance of repair for syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax (pp. 261–288). New York: Academic 
Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 101–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organisation: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29, 1–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, 1. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semotica, 7, 289–327.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M. (2003). Environmental influences on aided language development: The role of partner adaptation. In S. von Tetzchner & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Developmental issues (pp. 155–175). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, A., Plejert, C., & Ronnberg, J. (2010). The role of active participation in interaction for children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Communication and Medicine, 7, 165–175.
   Google Scholar
• ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Basil, C. (2011). Terminology and notation in written representations of conversations with augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 141–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Jensen, M. H. (1996). Introduction. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 1–18). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Martinsen, H. (1996). Words and strategies: Conversations with young children who use aided language. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 65–88). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, W. H. G., & Peppe, S. (1996). Ending up in Ulster. In E. 
Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation 
(pp. 101–130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar