Social Validation of Vocabulary Selection: Ensuring Stakeholder Relevance

References

• Babbie, E., & Mouton, J. (2001). The practice of social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61, 1139–1160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Bornman, J., Bryen, D. N., Kershaw, P., & Ledwaba, G. (2011). Reducing the risk of being a victim of crime in South Africa: You can tell and be heard!Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 117–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryen, D. N. (2008). Vocabulary for socially-valued adult roles. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 294–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryen, D. N., Carey, A., & Frantz, B. (2003). Ending the silence: Adults who use augmentative communication and their experiences as victims of crimes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 123–134.
   Google Scholar
• Bryen, D. N., Kershaw, P., & Bornman, J. (2010). Communication for ALL: You can tell and be heard. Retrieved from http://disabilities.temple.edu/aacvocabulary/c4all.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Bryen, D. N., & Wickman, C. (2011)Ending the silence of people with little or no functional speech: Testifying in court. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31. Retrieved February 28, 2013 from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1711/1759
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge, P., & Forrester-Jones, R. (2003). Using individualized communication for interviewing people with intellectual disability: A case study of user-centered research. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 28, 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, F. (1981). A format for selecting vocabulary for the nonspeaking child. Language Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 12, 240–245.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, B. (2012). Communication access to justice. Retrieved from http://www.access-to-justice.org/
   Google Scholar
• Collier, B., Blackstone, S. W., & Taylor, A. (2012). Communication access to businesses and organizations for people with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Commu nication, 28, 205–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education (1995). White Paper 5 on education and training in a democratic South Africa: First steps to develo ping a new system. Government Gazette35 (16312). Pretoria: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, K. L., & Huth, C. (2002). The impact of graphic contextual information and instruction on the conversational behaviours of a person with severe aphasia. Aphasiology, 16, 523–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, J. (2000). Vocabulary needs in augmentative and alternative communication: A sample of conversational topics between staff providing services to adults with learning difficulties and their service users. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 113–119.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, J. (2007). AAC WebCrawling - Communication content from the internet. Retrieved February 28, 2013 from http://aac-rerc.psu.edu/index-25756.php.html
   Google Scholar
• Ho, K. M., Weiss, S. J., Garrett, K. L., & Lloyd, L. L. (2005). The effect of remnant and pictographic books on the communicative interaction of individuals with global aphasia. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 218–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurst, R. (2003). The international disability rights movement and the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 572–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, A., Winckel, J., & Shumway, E. (1996). Pictographic communication resources manual. Toronto, Canada: Aphasia Centre, North York.
   Google Scholar
• Knutson, J. F., & Sullivan, P. M. (1993). Communicative disorders as a risk factor in abuse. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M., & Thompson, D. (1997). A prevalence study of sexual abuse of adults with intellectual disabilities referred for sex education. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 10, 105–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure, G. (1987). Readability formulas: Useful or useless (an interview with J. Peter Kincaid.). IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications, 30, 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Northway, R., Davies, R., Jenkins, R., & Mansell, I. (2004). Abuse of adults with learning disabilities: An examination of policy, practice and educational implications in Wales. Pontypridd: University of Glamorgan.
   Google Scholar
• Primor, S., & Lerner, N. (2012). The Right of Persons with Intellectual, Psychosocial and Communication Disabilities to Access to Justice Accommodations in the Criminal Process. Unpublished manuscript. Jerusalem: Bitzchut.
   Google Scholar
• Rackensperger, T. (2012). Family influences and academic success: The perspectives of individuals using AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 106–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rackensperger, T., Krezman, C., McNaughton, D., Williams, M.B., & D’Silva, K. (2005). “When I first got it, I wanted to throw it off a cliff”: The challenges and benefits of learning AAC technologies as described by adults who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 165–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter, S., Bryen, D. N., & Shachar, Y. (2007). Adolescents with intellectual disabilities as victims of crimes. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 11, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. (1999). Social validation of interventions in augmenta tive and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 234–247.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, H. C., Blackstone, S., Vanderheiden, G., Williams, M., & DeRuyter, F. (2012). Using AAC technology to access the world. Assistive Technology, 24, 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shewan, C. M., & Cameron, H. (1984). Communication and related problems as perceived by aphasic individuals and their spouses. Journal of Communication Disorders, 17, 175–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudsawad, P. (2009). Developing a social validation model for effective utilization of disability and rehabilitation research. Retrieved from http://www.researchutilization.org/matrix/generate/switzerreport.html
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. M. (2009). Violence exposure among children with disabilities. Clinical Child and Family Psycological Review, 12, 196–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. M., & Knutson, J. F. (2000). Maltreatment and disabilities: A population-based epidemiological study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 1257–1273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Enable (2012). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=259
   Google Scholar
• Van de Sandt-Koenderman, M. (2004). High-tech AAC and aphasia: Widening horizons? Aphasiology, 18, 245–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subject ive measurement or how applied behavior analysis is fin ding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 11, 203–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar