Exploring the Impact of Cognition on Young Children's Ability to Navigate a Speech-Generating Device

References

• Alloway, T. P. (2007). The Automatic Working Memory Assessment (AWMA) [Computer Software]. London: Harcourt Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E., & Pickering, S. J. (2006). Verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory in children: Are they separable? Child Development, 77, 1698–1716. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00968.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alliano, A., Herriger, K., Koutsoftas, A. D., & Bartolotta, T. E. (2012). A review of 21 iPad applications for augmentative and alternative communication purposes. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 60–71. doi: 10.1044/aac21.2.60
   Google Scholar
• Android. (2013). Android. Retrieved from http://www.android.com/
   Google Scholar
• Apple Inc. (2013). Apple. Retrieved from http://www.apple.com/
   Google Scholar
• AssistiveWare. (2013). Proloquo2go [Mobile application software]. Retrieved from http://itunes.apple.com/
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 417–423. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory 8 (pp. 47–90). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2006). Demographics of preschoolers who require AAC. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 200–208. doi: 0161-1461/06/3703-0200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blischak, D. M., Lombardino, L. J., & Dyson, A. T. (2003). Use of speech-generating devices: In support of natural speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 29–35. doi: 10.1080/0743461032000056478
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cafiero, J. M., & Stern Delsack, B. (2007). AAC and autism: Compelling issues, promising practices and future directions. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 23–26. doi: 10.1044/aac16.2.23
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier, N., & Blaye, A. (2008). Cognitive flexibility in preschoolers: The role of representation and activation and maintenance. Developmental Science, 11, 339–353. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00679.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deák, G. O. (2003). The development of cognitive flexibility and language abilities. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior (pp. 271–327). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz, R. M. (1985). Bilingual cognitive development: Addressing three gaps in current research. Child Development, 56, 1376–1388. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.ep7252620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drager, K. D. R., & Light, J. C. (2006). Designing dynamic display AAC systems for young children with complex communication needs. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Drager, K. D. R., Light, J. C., Carlson, R., D’Silva, K., Larsson, B., Pitkin, L., & Stopper, G. (2004). Learning of dynamic display AAC technologies by typically developing 3-year-olds: Effect of different layouts and menu approaches. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1133–1148. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., Thériault-Whalen, C. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1993). Échelle de Vocabulaire en Images Peabody. Adaptation francaise du Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Manuel pour les formes A et B. Toronto, ON: Psycan.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, G., Johnson, C. R., & Minshew, N. J. (2001). Attentional processes in autism. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 31, 433–440. doi: 0162-3257/01/0800-0433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. (1987). The development of categorization in the second year and its relation to other cognitive and linguistic development. Child Development, 58, 1523–1531. doi: 009-3920/87/5806-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J. R., Chabris, C. F., & Braver, T. S. (2003). Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 316–322. doi: 10.1038/nn1014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks, N. (2001). Cognitive linguistic quick test (CLQT). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Hershberger, D. (2011). Mobile technology and AAC apps from an AAC developer's perspective. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 28–33. doi: 10.1044/aac20.1.28
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, J. D. (1995). Use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research: Confessions of a research infidel. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 2–5. doi: 10.1080/07434619512331277079
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, J., & Jacobs, S. (2011). The future of the android operating system for augmentative and alternative communication. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 52–56. doi: 10.1044/aac20.2.52
   Google Scholar
• Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1967). Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence. Acta Psychologica, 26, 107–129. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(67)90011-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hux, K., & Manasse, N. (2003). Assessment and treatment of cognitive-communication impairments. In K. Hux (Ed.), Assisting survivors of traumatic brain injury (pp. 93–133). Austin, TX: ProEd.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, S., Horstmann, H. M., & Kirsch, N. L. (1992). Performance considerations for people with cognitive impairment in accessing assistive technologies. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 7, 46–58. doi: 10.1097/00001199-199209000-00007
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2002). Improving the design of AAC technologies for young children. Assistive Technology, 14, 17–32. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2002.10132052
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2007). AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 204–216. doi: 10.1080/07434610701553635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K., McCarthy, J., Mellott, S., Millar, D., Parrish, C. . . Welliver, M. (2004). Performance of typically developing four- and five-year-old children with AAC systems using different language organization techniques. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 63–88. doi: 10.1080/07434610410001655553
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Lindsay, P. (1991). Cognitive science and augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 186–203. doi: 0743-4618/91/0703-0186
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., Fuller, D. R., & Arvidson, H. H. (1997). Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A handbook of principles and practices. Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuko, M., Reichle, J., Ratcliff, A., & Esser, J. (1994). Effects of selection techniques and array sizes on short-term visual memory. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 237–244. doi: 10.1080/07434619412331276940
   Google Scholar
• Musselwhite, C. R., & St. Louis, K. W. (1988). Communication programming for persons with severe handicaps. Austin, TX: Pro- Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Olin, A. R., Reichle, J., Johnson, L., & Monn, E. (2010). Examining dynamic visual scene displays: Implications for arranging and teaching symbol selection. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 284–297. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxley, J. D., & Norris, J. A. (2000). Children's use of memory strategies: Relevance to voice output communication aid use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 79–94. doi: 0743-4618/00/1602-0079
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., Dettling, E. E., Drager, K. D., & Leiter, A. (2000). A comparison of correct responses and response latency for fixed and dynamic displays: Performance of a learner with severe developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 154–163. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07434610012331279014
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., & Drager, K. D. R. (2010). Examining issues of aided communication display and navigational strategies for young children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities,22, 289–311. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10882-010-9191-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roid, G. H., & Miller, L. J. (1997). Leiter international performance scale revised (Leiter-R). Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, C., & Schweigert, P. D. (2003). Cognitive skills and AAC. In J. C. Light, D. R. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice (pp. 241–275). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Schweizer, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2004). Attention and working memory as predictors of intelligence. Intelligence, 32, 329–347. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2004.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennott, S., & Bowker, A. (2009). Autism, AAC, and Proloquo2Go. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 137–145. doi: 10.1044/aac18.4.137
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, G. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Thistle, J. J., & Wilkinson, K. (2012). What are the attention demands of aided AAC? Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 17–22. doi: 10.1044/aac21.1.17
   Google Scholar
• Van Tatenhove, G. M. (2009). Building language competence with students using AAC devices: Six challenges. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 38–47. doi: 10.1044/aac18.2.38
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, S., Hux, K., & Beukelman, D. (2010). Navigation of a dynamic screen AAC interface by survivors of severe traumatic brain injury. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 242–254. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2010.521895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warm, J. S., Parasuraman, R., & Matthews, G. (2008). Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human Factors, 50, 433–441. doi: 10.1518/001872008X312152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Coombs, B. (2010). Preliminary exploration of the effect of background color on the speed and accuracy of search for an aided symbol target by typically developing preschoolers. Early Childhood Services, 4, 171–183.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Hennig, S. (2007). The state of research and practice in augmentative and alternative communication for children with developmental/intellectual disabilities. Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews, 13, 58–69. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.20133
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zarghi, A., Zali, A., Tehranidost, M., Zarindast, M. R., Ashrafi, F., Doroodgar, S., & Khodadadi, S. M. (2011). Demographic variables and selective, sustained attention and planning through cognitive tasks among healthy adults. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, 2, 58–67.
   Google Scholar