Population Screening for Colorectal Cancer, the Goals and Means

References

• Hertz R EL, Deddish M R., Day E. Value of periodic examinations in detecting cancer of the rectum and colon. Postgrad Med 1960; 27: 290–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Traul D G., Davis C B., Pollock J C., Scudamore H H. Flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy–The Monroe Clinic Experience. A prospective study of 5000 examinations. Dis Colon & Rectum 1983; 26: 161–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neugut A I., Pita S. Role of sigmoidoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer: A critical review. Gastroenterology 1988; 95: 492–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selby J V., Friedmann G D. Sigmoidoscopy in the periodic health examination of asymptomatic adults. JAMA 1989; 261: 595–601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbertsen V A. Proctosigmoidoscopy and polypectomy in reducing the incidence of rectal cancer. Cancer 1974; 34: 936–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dales L G., Friedman G D., Collen M F. Evaluating periodic multiphasic health checkups: A controlled trial. J Chron Dis 1979; 32: 385–404
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selby J V., Friedman G D., Collen M F. Sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer: The Kaiser permanente multiphasic evaluation study. J Clin Epidemiol 1988; 41: 427–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen J, Kewenter J, Haglind E, Lycke G, Svensson C, Åhrén C. Diagnostic accuracy of couble-constrast enema and rectosigmodoscopy in connection with faecal occult blod testing for the detection of rectosigmoid neoplasms. Br J Surg 1986; 73: 961–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Månsson J. The Diagnosis of colorectal cancer–experiences from the community of Kungsbacka, Sweden. Scand J Prim Health Care 1990; 8: 31–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohlman T W., Katon R M., Lipshutz G R., McCool M F., Smith F W., Melnyk C S. Fiberoptic pansigmoidoscopy. An evaluation and comparison with rigid sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 1977; 72: 644–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winawer S J., Miller C, Lightdale C, et al. Patient response to sigmoidoscopy. A randomized, controlled trial of rigid and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Cancer 1987; 60: 1905–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellacott K D., Hardcastle J D. An evaluation of flexible fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy. Br Med J 1981; 283: 1583–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mullins R J., Whitworth P W., Polk H C. Screening before surgery for colon neoplasms with a flexible sigmoidoscope by surgical residents. Ann Surg 1987; 205: 659–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman G A., Hawes R, Roth B, Hast J. A study of optimal length of flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopes for initial endoscopic training. Dis Colon & Rectum 1986; 29: 878–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott D J., Wu W C., Gelfand D W. Extent of colonic visualization with the fiberoptic sigmoidoscope. J Clin Gastroentrol 1982; 4: 337–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnan G, Berci G, Panish J, Talbot T M., Overhold B F., McCallun R W. Superiority of the flexible to the rigid sigmoidoscope in routine proctosigmoidoscopy. New Engl J Med 1980; 302: 1011–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leicester R J., Pollette W G., Hawley P R., Nicholls R J. Flexible fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy as an outpatient procedure. Lancet 1982; i: 34–5
   Google Scholar
• Gupta T P., Jaszewski R, Luk G D. Efficacy of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic subjects. Am J Med 1989; 86: 547–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon S W., Acquavella J F., Yarborough C M., Hughes J I., Thar W E. Reasons for participation and non participation in a colorectal cancer screening program for a cohort of high risk polypropylene workers. J Occup Med 1990; 32: 46–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agrez M V., Redman S, Sanson-Fisher R, Hennrikus D. Feasibility of sigmoidoscopic screening for colorectal cancer in the hunter region. Aust NZ J Surg 1990; 60: 87–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grobe J L., Kozarek R A., Sanowski R A. Flexible versus rigid sigmoidoscopy: A comparison using an inexpensive 36-cm flexible proctosigmoidoscope. Am J Gastroenterol 1983; 78: 569–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubow R A., Katon R M., Benner K G., van Dijk C M., Koval G, Smith F W. Short (35-cm) versus long (60-cm) flexible sigmoidoscopy: a comparison of findings and tolerance in asymptomatic patients screened for colerectal neoplasia. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 1985; 31: 305–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvien E J., O'Connor J, Frost R A., et al. Prospective comparison of double contrast barium enema plus flexible sigmoidoscopy v colonoscopy in rectal bleeding. GUT 1988; 29: 1188–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuman B M., McKay M D., Griffin J W. The use of the 130-cm colonoscope for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroentestinal Endoscopy 1988; 34: 459–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott D J., Chen Y M., Gelfand D W., Wu W C., Munitz H A. Single-contrast vs double-contrast barium enema in the detection of colonic polyps. AJR 1986; 146: 997–1004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldridge M C., Sim A JW. Colonoscopy findings in symptomatic patients without x-ray evidence of colonic neoplasms. Lancet 1986; ii: 833–4
   Google Scholar
• Cordone R P., Brandies S Z., Richman H. Rectal perforation during barium enema. Dis Colon & Rectum 1988; 31: 563–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry R D., Shemesh E I., Kodner I J., Fleshman J W., Timmcke A E. Perforation of the rectum and sigmoid colon during barium-enema examination. Dis Colon & Rectum 1989; 32: 759–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex D K., Weddle R A., Lehman G A., et al. Flexible sigmoidoscopy plus air contrast barium enema versus colonoscopy for suspected lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 1990; 98: 855–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson C D., Carlson H C., Taylor W F., Weiland L P. Barium enemas of carcinoma of the colon: sensitivity of double-and single-contrast studies. AJR 1983; 140: 1143–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åberg T, Ling L, Breland V, Norlund A. Does flexible sigmoidoscopy have any justification as compared with complete colonoscopy. Endoscopy 1985; 17: 133–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durdey P, Weston P MT, Williams N S. Colonoscopy or barium enema as initial investigation of colonic disease. Lancet 1987; ii: 549–51
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay D C., Freeman J G., Cobden I, Record C O. Should colonoscopy be the first investigation for colonic disease?. Br Med J 1988; 296: 167–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farrands P A., Vellacott K D., Amar S S., Balfour T W., Hardcastle J W. Flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy and double-contrast barium-enema examination in the identification of adenomas and carcinoma of the colon. Dis Colon & Rectum 1983; 26: 727–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito Y, Slezak P, Rubio C. The diagnostic value of combining flexible sigmoidoscopy and double-contrast barium enema as a one-stage procedure. Gastrointest Radiol 1989; 14: 357–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Go V LW, Zamchek N. The role of tumor markers in the management of Colorectal cancer. Cancer 1982; 50: 2618–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher R H. Carcinoembryonic antigen. Ann Int Med 1986; 104: 66–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz M K. Markers in screening: Overview of usefulness of markers. Colorectal Cancer: Prevention, epidemiology and screening, S J. Winawer, D Schottenfeld, P Sherlock. Raven Press, New York 1980; 205–10
   Google Scholar
• Mercer D W., Talamo T S. Multiple markers of malignancy in sera of patients with colorectal carcinoma: Preliminary Clinical Studies. Clin Chem 1985; 31: 1824–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor D H. Diagnosis of large-bowel cancer in the asymptomatic patient. JAMA 1967; 201: 943–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleisher M, Schwartz M K., Winawer S J. Fecal occult blood testing. Screening for Cancer, A B. Miller. Academic Press Inc., New York 1985; 237–47
   Google Scholar
• Macrae F A., StJohn D JB. Relationship between patterns of bleeding and Hemoccult sensitivity in patients with colorectal cancer or adenomas. Gastroenterology 1982; 82: 891–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winawer S J., Fleisher M. Editorial. Sensitivity and specificity of the fecal occult blood test for colorectal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 1982; 82: 986–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songster C L., Barrows G H., Jarrett D D. Immunochemical detection of fecal occult blood–the fecal smear punch-disc test: A new non-invasive screening test for colorectal cancer. Cancer 1980; 45: 1099–1102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häkkinen I, Paasivuo R, Partanen P. Screening of colorectal tumours using an improved faecal occult blood test. Quantitative aspects. Gut 1988; 29: 1194–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlquist D A., McGill D B., Schwartz S, Taylor W F., Owen R A. Fecal blood levels in health and disease. A study using Hemoquant. New Engl J Med 1985; 312: 1422–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. John J B. Faecal occult blood tests: A critical review. Screening for colorectal cancer, J Hardcastle. Normed Verlag, Engelwood, NJ 1989; 54–68
   Google Scholar
• Turunen M J., Liewendahl K, Partanen P, Adlercreutz H. Immunological detection of faecal occult blood in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 1984; 49: 141–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage N, Hardcastle J D., Amar S S., Balfour T W., Haynes J, James P D. A comparison of an immunological faecal occult blood test fecatwin sensitive/FECA EIA with Haemoccult in population screening for colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 1985; 51: 799–804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frommer D J., Kapparis A, Brown N IK. Improved screening for colorectal cancer by immunological detection of occult blood. Br Med J 1988; 296: 1092–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrands P A., Hardcastle J D. Accuracy of occult blood test over a six-day period. Clinical Oncology 1983; 9: 217–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas W M., Pye G, Hardcastle J D., Mangham C M. Faecal occult blood screening for colorectal neoplasia: a randomized trial of three days or six days of test. Br J Surg 1990; 77: 277–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison J E., Feldman R, Tekawa I S. Haemoccult screening in detecting colorectal neoplasm: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. Ann Int Med 1990; 112: 328–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robra B, Wahrendorf J. Fecal occult blood screening in the Federal Republic of Germany. Screening for colorectal cancer, J D. Hardcastle. Normed Verlag, Engelwood, NJ 1989; 70–7
   Google Scholar
• Gilbertsen V A., Church T R., Grewe F J., et al. The design of a study to assess occult blood screening for colon cancer. J Chron Dis 1980; 33: 107–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flehinger B J., Herbert E, Winawer S J., Miller D G. Screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test and sigmoidoscopy: Preliminary report of the colon project of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and PMI-Strang Clinic. Screening for Colorectal Cancer, J Chamberlain, A B. Miller. Hans Huber Publishers, Toronto 1987; 9–16
   Google Scholar
• Kewenter J, Björk S, Haglind E, Smith L, Svanvik J, Åhrén C. Screening and rescreening for colorectal cancer. A controlled trial of fecal occult blood testing in 27,700 subjects. Cancer 1988; 62: 645–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen J, Kewenter J, Asztély M, Lycke G, Wojciechowski J. Double contrast barium enema and flexible rectosigmoidoscopy: a reliable diagnostic combination for detection of colorectal neoplasm. Br J Surg 1990; 77: 270–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kewenter J, Haglind E, Smith L. Value of a risk questionnaire in screening for colorectal neoplasm. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 280–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardcastle J D., Farrands P A., Balfour T W., Chamberlain J, Amar S S., Sheldon M G. Controlled trial of faecal occult blood testing in the detection of colorectal cancer. Lancet 1983; ii: 1–4
   Google Scholar
• Hardcastle J D., Chamberlain J, Sheffield J, et al. Randomised, controlled trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 1989; i: 1160–4
   Google Scholar
• Hardcastle J D., Winawer S J., Burt R W., Kronborg O, StJohn J B. Screening for colorectal neoplasia, World Congresses of Gastroenterology. Working Party Reports. Blackwell, Melbourne 1990; 27–35
   Google Scholar
• Pye G, Ballantyne K C., Armitage N C., Hardcastle J D. Comparison of 3-day Haemoccult, 6-day Haemoccult and FECA EIA test in detection of faecal occult blood in screening for colorectal cancer. GUT 1986; 27((10))A 1242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamsen S, Kronborg O. Acceptability and compliance in screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test. Scand J Gastroent 1984; 19: 531–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronborg O, Fenger C, Søndergaard O, Pedersen K M., Olsen J. Initial mass screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test. Scand J Gastroent 1987; 22: 677–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Beck K, Søndergaard O. Repeated screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test. A prospective randomized study at Funen, Denmark. Scand J Gastroent 1989; 24: 599–606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaaborg K, Madsen M S., Søndergaard O, Kronborg O. Participation in mass screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test. Scand J Gastroent 1986; 21: 1180–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faivre J. Preliminary results of a mass screening programme for colorectal cancer in France. Screening for colorectal cancer, J D. Hardcastle. Normed Verlag, Engelwood, NJ 1989; 94–101
   Google Scholar
• Eddy D M. Diagnosis and treatment. Screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Int Med 1990; 113: 373–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck J, Walker A, Whynes D K., Pye G, Hardcastle J D., Chamberlain J. Screening and the cost of treating colorectal cancer: some preliminary results. Public Health 1989; 103: 413–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson S, Jonsson E. Screening för cancer–underlaget dåligt för kalkyl om kostnader och nytta. Läkartidningen 1984; 81: 4734–42
   Google Scholar
• Kronborg O, Brok K E. Colonoscopic activity in a department of gastroenterological surgery during a nine-year period. Ugeskr Laeger 1988; 150: 2393–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar