Male Infertility: Current Concepts

References

• Hargreaves T B. Male infertility. Springer‐Verlag, Berlin 1983; 4
   Google Scholar
• Simmons F A. Human infertility. N Engl J Med 1956; 255: 1140–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swerdloff R S. Infertility in the male. Annals Int Med 1985; 103: 906–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macomber D, Sanders B. The spermatozoa count. It's value in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of sterility. N Engl J Med 1929; 200: 981–90
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod J, Gold R Z. The male factor in fertility and infertility. II. Spermatozoa counts in 1000 men of known fertility and in 1000 cases of infertile marriage. J Urol 1951; 66: 436–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukerman Z, Rodrlguez‐Rlgau L J, Smith K D, Stelnberger E. Frequency distribution of sperm counts in fertile and infertile males. Fertil Steril 1977; 28: 1310–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostofte E, Serup J, Rebbe H. Relation between sperm count and semen volume, and pregnancies obtained during a 20‐year follow‐up period. J Androl 1982; 5: 379–86
   Google Scholar
• Glass R H, Ericsson R J. Spontaneous cure of male infertility. Fertil Steril 1979; 31: 305–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry W F. Male infertility. Br J Hosp Med July, 1979; 47–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Zyl J A, Menkveld R, Van Kotze W, Retlef A E, Van Nlekerk W A. Oligozoospermia: a seven‐year survey of the incidence, chromosomal abberations, treatment and pregnancy rate. Int J Fertil 1975; 20: 129–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith K D, Rodrlguez‐Rlgau L J, Stelnberger E. Relation between indices of semen analysis and pregnancy rate in infertile couples. Ferll Steril 1977; 28: 1314–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull M G, Glazener C M, Kelly N J, Conway D I, Foster P A, Hinton R A, Coulson C, Lambert P A, Watt E M, Oesal K M. Population study of causes, treatment and outcome of infertility. Br Med J 1985; 291: 1693–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreave T B, Elton R A. Is conventional sperm analysis of any use?. Br J Urol 1983; 55: 774–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glazener C MA, Kelly N J, Weir M JA, David J SE, Cornes J S, Hull M GR. The diagnosis of male infertility‐prospective time‐specific study of conception rates related to seminal analysis and post‐coital sperm‐mucus penetration and survival In otherwise unexplained Infertility. Hum Reprod 1987; 2: 665–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvis K, Tollefsrud A, Rul H. Correlates of human sperm motility assessed by taser‐Doppler spectroscopy. J Reprod Fertil 1989; 12: 10–16
   Google Scholar
• Polansky F F, Lamb E J. Do the results of semen analysis predict future fertility? A survival analysis study. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 1059–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubin L, Amelar R D. Etiologic factors in 1294 consecutive caes of male infertility. Fertil Steril 1971; 22: 460–74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El‐Bayouml M A, Hamada T A, El‐Mokaddem H H. Male infertility: etiologic factors in 385 consecutive cases. Andrologia 1981; 14: 331–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker H WG, Burger H G, De Kretser D M, Hudson B. Relative incidence of etiologic disorders in male infertility. Male sexual dysfunction, R J Santen, R S Swerdloff. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York 1986; 341–52
   Google Scholar
• Osser S, Lledholm P, Ranstam J. Depressed semen quality: a study over two decades. Arch Androl 1984; 12: 113–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menkveld R, Van Zyl J A, Kotze T JW, Joubert G. Possible changes in male fertility over a 15‐year period. Arch Androl 1986; 17: 143–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldereld N B, Rul H, Purvis K. Lifestyles of men in barren couples and their relationships to sperm quality. Eur J Obstet Gyn Reprod Biol 1992; 43: 51–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brzek A. Alcohol and male fertility. Andrologia 1987; 19: 32–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayers J W, Komesu Y, Romanl T, Ansbacher R. Anthropomorphic, hormonal, and psychological correlates of semen quality in endurance‐trained male athletes. Fertil Steril 1985; 43: 917–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown‐Woodman P DC, Post E J, Gass G C, White I G. The effect of a sauna exposure on spermatozoa. Arch Androl 1984; 12: 9–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poland M L, Giblin P T, Ager J W, Moghissi K S. Effects of stress on semen quality in semen donors. Int J Fertil 1986; 31: 229–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giblin P T, Poland M L, Moghissi K S. Effects of stress and characteristic adaptability on semen quality in healthy men. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 127–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldereid N B, Rui H, Purvis K. Male partners in infertile couples. Personal attitudes and contact with the Norwegian health service. Scand J Soc Med 1990; 18: 207–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lancranjan I, Popescu H I, Gavenescu O, Klepsch I, Sebanescu M. Reproductive ability of workmen occupationally exposed to lead. Arch Environ Health 1975; 30: 396–401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachootin p, Olsen J. The risk of infertility and delayed conception associated with exposures in the Danish workplace. J Occ Med 1983; 25: 394–402
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steeno O P, Pangkahila A. Occupational influences on male fertility and sexuality. Andrologia 1984; 16: 5–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusch H H. Diagnosis of toxic liver damage on the basis of an abnormal spermogram. Wien Klin Wochenschr 1984; 96: 857–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass R I, Lyness R N, Mengle D C, Powell K E, Kahn E. Sperm count depression in pesticide applicators exposed to dibromochloropropane. Am J Epidemiol 1979; 109: 346–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schllsky R L, Lewis B J, Sherins R J, Young R C. Gonadal dysgenesis in patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer. Annals Int Med 1980; 93: 109–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdla A, Mathur V, Kothari L K, Singh K P. Sulphatrimethoprim combinations and male infertility. Lancet 1978; 2: 375–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drife J O. Drugs and sperm. Br Med J 1982; 284: 844–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neumann F. Effects of drugs and chemicals on spermatogenesis. Arch Toxicol 1984; 7: 109–17, (Suppl)
   Google Scholar
• Birnie G G, McLeod T IF, Watkinson G. Incidence of sulphasalazine‐induced male infertility. Gut 1981; 22: 452–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mieusset R, Bujan L, Mondlnat C. Association of scrotal hyperthermia with impaired spermatogenesis in infertile men. Fertil Steril 1987; 48: 1006–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brindley G S. Deep scrotal temperature and the effect on it of clothing, air temperature, activity, posture and paraplegia. Br J Urol 1982; 54: 49–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacLeod J, Hotchkiss R S. The effect of hyperpyrexia upon spermatozoa counts in men. Endocrinology 1941; 28: 780–4
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe A. The effect of heat on human spermatogenesis. Kyushi J Med Sci 1959; 10: 101–17
   Google Scholar
• Procope B J. Effect of repeated increase of body temperature on human sperm cells. Int J Fertil 1965; 10: 333–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson D, Rock J, Menkin M F. Control of human spermatogenesis by induced changes of intrascrotal temperature. JAMA 1968; 204: 290–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorgnlotti A W, Cohen M S, Seafon Al. Chronic scrotal hypothermia: results in 90 infertile couples. J Urol 1986; 135: 944–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch R, Lewis‐Jones D I, Machln D G, Desmond A D. Improved seminal characteristics in infertile men after a conservative treatment regimen based on the avoidance of testicular hyperthermia. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 476–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry W F. Loose pants and scrotal douches: effects on spermatogenesis. Sperm Action: Prog Reprod Biol 1975; 1: 259–62
   Google Scholar
• Agger P. Scrotal and testicular temperature: its relation to sperm count before and after operation for varicocele. Fertil Steril 1971; 22: 286–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorgnlotti A, MacLeod J. Studies in temperature, human semen quality and varicocele. Fertil Steril 1973; 24: 854–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor J L, Howards S S. Varicocele. Urol Clinics North America 1987; 44: 499–513
   Google Scholar
• Johnson D E, Pohl D R, Rivera‐Correa H. Varicocele: an innocuous condition. South Med J 1970; 63: 34–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saypol D C. Varicocele. J Androl 1981; 2: 61–71
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson J D, O'Shaughnessy E J. Hypospermia and its relationship to varicocele and intrascrotal temperature. Fertil Steril 1968; 19: 110–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez‐Rigau L J, Smith K D, Steinberger E. Relationship of varicocele to sperm output and fertility of male partners in infertile couples. J Urol 1978; 120: 691–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson S, Edvinsson A, Nilsson B. Improvement of semen and pregnancy rate after ligation and division of the internal spermatic vein: Fact or fiction?. Br J Urol 1979; 51: 591–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee H Y, Shim H B, Lee K S. Effects of varicocelectomy on spermatogenesis. Varicocele and Male Infertility. Springer‐Verlag, Berlin 1984; Vol II.: 100
   Google Scholar
• Vermeulen A, Vandeweghe M. Improved fertility after varicocele correction: fact or fiction?. Fertil Steril 1984; 42: 249–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker H WG, Burger H G, de Kretser D M, Hudson B, Rennie G C, Straffon W GE. Testicular vein ligation and fertility in men with varicocele. Br Med J 1985; 291: 1678–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getzoff P L. Surgical management of male infertility: results of a survey. Fertil Steril 1973; 24: 553–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaiber E L, Broverman D M, Pokoly T B, Albert A J, Howard P J, Sherer J F. Interrelationships of cigarette smoking, testicular varicocees, and seminal fluid indexes. Fertil Steril 1987; 47: 481–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerris J, Van Nueten J, Van Camp C, Gentens P, Van de Vijver I, Van Camp K. Clinical aspects in the surgical treatment of varicocele in subfertile men. II. The role of the epididymal factor. Eur J Obstet Gyn Reprod Biol 1988; 27: 43–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvis K, Christiansen E. The role of pelvic organ inflammation in the etiology of sperm pathology. Int J Fertil 1992, in press
   Google Scholar
• Comhalre F H, de Kretser D, Farley T MM, Rowe P J. Towards more objectivity in diagnosis and management of male infertility. Int J Andronl 1987; 7: 1–53, (Suppl)
   Google Scholar
• Derrick, Jr, Dahlberg B. Male genital infections and sperm viability. Human Semen and Fertility Regulation in Men, E SE Hafez. CV Mosby Co, St Louis 1976; 389–97
   Google Scholar
• Gorlnl G, Mllano F, Olliaro P, Ragazzetti A, Rondanelli E G. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in primary unexplained infertility. Eur J Epidemiol 1990; 6: 335–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peek J C, Graham F M, Hookman A. Prevalence of chlamydial antibodies in women with tubal disease: Impact of chlamydia trachomatis on the demand for in vitro fertilization. New Z Med J 1990; 103: 63–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen E, Tollefsrud A, Purvis K. Sperm quality in men with chronic abacterial prostaovesiculitis verified by rectal ultrasonography. Urology 1991; 38: 545–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikkanen V, Gronroos M, Suominen J, Multamaki S. Silent infections in male accessory genital organs and male infertility. Andrologia 1979; 11: 236–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulstein M, Capell P, Holmes K K, Paulsen C A. Non‐symptomatic genital tract infection and male infertility. Human Semen and Fertility Regulation in Men, E SE Hafez. CV Mosby Co, St Louis 1976; 355–62
   Google Scholar
• Colpi G M, Roveda M L, Tognetti A, Balerna M. Seminal tract inflammation and male infertility. Acta Europea Pert 1988; 19: 69–77
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Close E, Roberts P L, Berger R E. Cigarettes, alcohol and marijuana are related to pyospermia in infertile men. J Urol 1990; 144: 900–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doble A, Carter S S. Ultrasonographic findings in prostatitis. Urol Clin North Am 1989; 16: 763–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoysman R, Gattuccio F. Search for transit difficulties in the epididymis for differential diagnosis of oligospermia. Acta Europ Fertil 1976; 7: 49–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desal S, Cohen M S, Khatamee M, Letter E. Ureaplasma urealyticum (T‐mycoplasma) infection: does it have a role in male infertility?. J Urol 1980; 124: 469–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granouillet F I, Gaudin O G, Laurent J C, Rousset H, Moulin A. Etude de la flora microbienne spermatique chez des patients consultant pour sterilite. Pathol Biol (Paris) 1982; 30: 22–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Leary W M, Frick J. The correlation of human male infertility with the presence of mycoplasma T‐strains. Andrologia 1975; 7: 309–16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swenson C E, Toth A, O'Leary W M. Ureaplasma urealyticum and human infertility: The effect of antibiotic therapy on sperm quality. Fertil Steril 1979; 31: 660–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanetl J, Sarov B, Sarov I. IgG and IgA antibodies specific for Chlamydia trachomatis in acute epididymitis. Eur Urol 1988; 14: 323–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plura B, Sarov I, Sarov B, Klelnman D, Chaim W, Insler V. Serum IgG and IgA antibodies specific for chlamydia trachomatis in salpingitis patients as determined by immunoperoxidase assay. Eur J Epidemiol 1985; 1: 110–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weidner W, Schiefer H G, Krauss H. Role of Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma in chronic prostatitis. A review. Urol Int 1988; 43: 167–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce A W, Reid G. Prostatitis associated with Chlamydia trachomatis in 6 patients. J Urol 1989; 142: 1006–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsunekawa T, Kumamoto Y. A study of IgA, IgG titers for C. trachomatis in serum and prostatic secretion. J Japan Assoc Infect Dis 1989; 63: 130–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brandtaæg P, Christiansen E, Muller F, Purvis K. Humoral immune response patterns of human mucosae, including the reproductive tracts. Local Immunity in Reproductive Tract Tissue. Proceedings of a symposium convened by the WHO, New DelhiIndia, 1992; 26–30
   Google Scholar
• Patriarca A, Glarcardi M, Rustichelli S, latino M. A., Mapelli F, Coppola C. Correlation of positivity for serum anti‐chlamydia antibodies and tubal damage as a cause of infertility. Minerva Ginecologica 1989; 41: 215–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scheel O, Aanestad G. Significance of immunological IgA titres in the diagnosis of urogenital chlamydial infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Inf Dis 1989; 8: 726–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjercke S, Purvis K. Use of Chlamydia serology in the investigation of infertility. Hum Reprod 1992, in press
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Agata R, Helndel J J, Vicari E, Aliffi A, Gullzia S, Polosa P. hCG‐induced maturation of the seminiferous epithelium in hypogonadotropic men. Norm Res 1984; 19: 23–32
   Google Scholar
• Brook C G, Jacobs H S, Stanhope R, Adams J, Hindmarsh P. Pulsatility of reproductive hormones: applications to the understanding of puberty and to the treatment of infertility. Baillière's Clin Endocrin Metab 1987; 1: 23–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alman J, Griffin J E, Gazak J M, Wilson J D, MacDonald P C. Androgen insensitivity as a cause of infertility in otherwise normal men. New Engl J Med 1979; 300: 223–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow A F, Gyorki S, Warne G L, Burger H G, Bangah M L, Outch K H, Mirovics A, Baker H WG. Variable androgen receptor levels in infertile men. J Clin Endocrin Metab 1987; 54: 1115–21
   Google Scholar
• Schramm P, Benes P. Reduktaseschwäche als Ursache andrologischer Störungen?. Andrologia 1982; 14: 177–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varma T R, Patel R H. The effect of mesterolone on sperm count, on serum follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, plasma testosterone and outcome in ideopathic oligospermic men. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1988; 26: 121–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Chan C W, Wong K K, Yeung K K. Comparison of the effectiveness of placebo, clomiphene citrate, mesterolone, pentoxyfylline, and testosterone rebound therapy for the treatment of ideopathic oligospermia. Fertil Steril 1983; 40: 358–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush J P, Lipshultz L I, Smith R G. Evidence for altered receptor‐binding activity of serum follicle stimulating hormone in male infertility. Fertil Steril 1991; 55: 358–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branson R A, Cooper G W, Rosenfeld D L. Correlation between regional specificity of antisperm antibodies to the spermatozoan surface and complement‐mediated sperm immobilization. Am J Reprod Immunol 1982; 2: 222–4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke G N, Elliott P J, Smalla C. Detection of sperm antibodies in semen using the immunobead test: a survey of 813 consecutive patients. Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol 1985; 7: 118–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wltkin S S, Vogel‐Roccuzzo R, David S S, Berkley A, Goldstein M, Graf M. Heterogeneity of antigenic determinants on human spermatozoa: relevance to antisperm antibody testing in infertile couples. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 1228–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke G N, Lopata A, Johnston W IH. Effect of sperm antibodies in females on human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 435–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman S, Pretorlus E, Keane T. Antibodies to spermatozoa. XI. The use of immunobeads for the detection of sperm antibodies in serum. Am J Reprod Immunol 1985; 9: 62–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson S A, Reiher J, Scommegna A, Prins G S. Antibody binding patterns in infertile males and females as detected by immunobead test, gel‐agglutination test, and sperm immobilization test. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 487–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menge A C, Beitner O. Interrelationships among semen characteristics, antisperm antibodies, and cervical mucus penetration assays in infertile human couples. Fertil Steril 1989; 51: 486–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretorlus E, Franken D R. The immunobead technique: an indicator of disturbed sperm cervical mucus interaction. Andrologia 1988; 20: 5–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barratt C LR, Havelock L M, Harrison P E, Cooke I D. Antisperm antibodies are more prevalent in men with low sperm motility. Int J Androl 1989; 12: 110–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang C, Baker H WG, Jennings M G, Burger H G, Lutjen P. Interaction between human cervical mucus and sperm surface antibodies. Fertil Steril 1985; 44: 484–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronson R A, Cooper G W, Rosenfleld D L. Spermspecific isoantibodies and autoantibodies inhibit the binding of human sperm to the human zona pellucida. Fertil Steril 1982; 38: 724–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas G G, Sokoloskl J E, Wolf D P. The interfering effect of human IgG antisperm antibodies on human sperm penetration of zona‐free hamster eggs. Am J Reprod Immunol 1980; 1: 40–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander N J. Antibodies to human spermatozoa impede sperm penetration of cervical mucus or hamster eggs. Fertil Steril 1984; 41: 433–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansford B, Haas G G, Jr, Debault L E, Wolf D P. Effect of sperm‐associated antibodies on the acrosomal status of human sperm. JAndrol 1990; 11: 532–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke G N, Lopata A, McBaln J C, Baker H W, Johnston Wl. Effect of sperm antibodies in males on human In vitro fertilization (IVF). Am J Reprod Immunol 1985; 8: 62–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellstrom W JG, Overstreet J W, Samuels S J, Lewis E L. The relationship of circulating antisperm antibodies to sperm surface antibodies in infertile men. J Urol 1988; 140: 1039–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahmanesh M, Stedronska J, Hendry W. Antispermatozoal antibodies in men with urethritis. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 308–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witkln S S, Toth A. Relationship between genital tract infections, sperm antibodies in seminal fluid, and infertility. Fertil Steril 1983; 40: 805–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersleu H J, Walter S, Andersen J T, Brandenhoff P, Eldrup J, Geerdsen J P, Scheibel J, Tromholt N, Jensen H M, Hjort T. A prospective study of antisperm antibody development in acute epididymitis. J Urol 1986; 136: 162–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Close C E, Wang S P, Roberts P L, Berger R E. The relationship of infection with Chlamydia trachomatis to the parameters of male infertility and sperm autoimmunity. Fertil Steril 1987; 48: 880–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjällbrant B, Nllsson S. Decrease of sperm antibody titer in males, and conception after treatment of chronic prostatitis. Int J Fertil 1977; 22: 255–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collins J A, So Y, Wilson E H, Wrixon W, Casper R F. The post‐coital test as a predictor of pregnancy among 355 infertile couples. Fertil Steril 1984; 41: 703–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull M GR, Savage P E, Bromham D R. The prognostic value of the post‐coital test: a prospective study based on time‐specific conception rates. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 89: 299–305
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schats R, Aitken R J, Templeton A A, Djahanbakhch O. The role of cervical mucus‐semen interaction in infertility of unknown aetiology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91: 371–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hull M GR, Joyce D N, McLeod F N, Ray B D, McDermott A. Human in vitro fertilization, in vivo sperm penetration of cervical mucus and unexplained infertility. Lancet 1984; ii: 245–6
   Google Scholar
• Alexander N J. Evaluation of male infertility with an in vitro cervical mucus penetration test. Fertil Steril 1981; 36: 201–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaddum‐Rosse P, Blandau R J, Lee Wl. Sperm penetration into cervical mucus in vitro. II. Human spermatozoa in bovine mucus. Fertil Steril 1980; 33: 644–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazener C MA, Hull M GR. The sperm‐mucus interface: patterns of disorder in the diagnosis of specific causes of penetration failure causing infertility. Hum Reprod 1987; 2: 673–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanaglmachl R, Yanagimachi H, Rogers B J. The use of zona‐free animal ova as a test system for the assessment of the fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 1976; 15: 471–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers B J, Van Campen H, Ueno M, Lambert H, Bronson R, Hale R. Analysis of human spermatozoal fertilizing ability using zona‐free ova. Fertil Steril 1979; 32: 664–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall J L. Relationship between semen quality and human sperm penetration of zona‐free hamster ova. Fertil Steril 1981; 35: 457–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken R J, Best F SM, Richardson D W, Djahanbakhch O, Mortimer D, Templeton A A, Lees M M. An analysis of sperm function in cases of unexplained infertility: conventional criteria, movement characteristics, and fertilizing capacity. Fertil Steril 1982; 38: 212–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertsen P C, Chang T SK, Vindivlch D, Robinson J C, Smyth J W. A critical method of evaluating tests for male infertility. J Urol 1983; 130: 467–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shy K K, Stenchever M A, Muller C H. Sperm penetration assay and subsequent pregnancy: a prospective study of 74 infertile men. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 685–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao C, Grimes D A. The sperm penetration assay: can it discriminate between fertile and infertile men?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 279–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corson S L, Batzer F R, Go K J, Eisenberg E, English M E, White S M, Laberge Y, Goldman N. Correlations between the human sperm‐hamster egg penetration assay and in vitro fertilization results. J Reprod Med 1987; 32: 879–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franken D R, Kruger T F, Mankveld R, Oehnlnger S, Coddington C C, Hodgen G D. Hemizona assay and teratozoospermia: increasing sperm insemination concentrations to enhance zona pellucida binding. Fertil Steril 1990; 54: 497–503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesarik J. Composition of acrosome‐inducing activities of human cumulus oophorus, follicular fluid and ionophore A23187 in human sperm populations of proven fertilizing ability in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1985; 74: 383–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cross N L, Morales P, Overstreet J M, Hanson F W. Two simple methods for detecting acrosome‐reacted human sperm. Gamete Res 1986; 15: 213–26
   Google Scholar
• Purvis K, Rui H, Schøiberg A, Hesla S, Clausen O PF. Application of flow cytometry to studies of the human acrosome. J Androl 1990; 11: 361–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engh E, Clausen O PF, Purvis K. Acrosomal integrity assessed by flow cytometry in men with variable sperm quality. Hum Reprod 1990; 6: 1129–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engh E, Schøiberg A, Clausen O PF, Purvis K. DNA flow cytometry of sperm from normozoospermic men in barren couples and men of proven fertility. Int J Fertil 1992, in press
   Google Scholar
• Engh E, Clausen O PF, Schøiberg A, Tollefsrud A, Purvis K. Relationship between sperm quality and chromatin conensation measured by sperm DNA fluorescence using flow cytometry. Int J Androl 1992, in press
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graham J K, Kunze E, Hammerstedt R H. Analysis of sperm cell viability, acrosomal integrity, and mitochondrial function using flow cytometry. Biol Reprod 1990; 43: 55–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeyendran R S, Van der Vev H H, Perez‐Pelaez M, Crabo B G, Zaneveld L JD. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. J Reprod Fertil 1984; 70: 219–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daya S, Gunby J, Kohut J. Semen predictors of in vitro fertilization and embryo cleavage. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 161: 1284–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier‐Delpech S, Courot M. Sperm‐zona pellucida binding activity. Oxfor Rev Reprod Biol 1987; 9: 294–321
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fowler J E, Kessler R. Genital tract infection. Infertility in the Male, LI Lipshultz, S S Howards. Churchill Livingstone, New York 1983; 283–98
   Google Scholar
• Skarin G, Nillfus S J, Wibell L, Wide L. Chronic pulsatile low dose GnRH therapy for induction of testosterone production and spermatogenesis in a man with secondary hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1982; 55: 723–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald R A, Wheeler M, Sönksen P H, Lowy C. Hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism resistant to hCG and responsive to LHRH: report of a case. Clin Endocrinol 1983; 18: 385–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozo del F. Hyperprolactinemia in male infertility. Treatment with bromocryptine. Treatment of Male Infertility, J Bain, W B Schill, L Schwarzstein. Springer‐Verlag, New York 1982; 73–84
   Google Scholar
• Schill W ‐B., Michalopoulos M. Treatment of male fertility disturbances: current concepts. Drugs 1984; 28: 263–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pescosolido D, Curatola A, Gentili S, Magiera M G, Decio R. A new gonadotropin treatment for ideopathic moderate oligoasthenospermia. Acta Eur Fertil 1985; 16: 129–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwarzstein L, Aparicio N J, Schally A V. D‐tryptophan‐6‐luteinizing hormone‐releasing hormone in the treatment of normogonadotropic oligoasthenozoospermia. Int J Androl 1982; 5: 171–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schellen A M. Clomiphene citrate in the treatment of male infertility. Treatment of Male Infertility, J Bain, W B Schill, L Schwarzstein. Springer‐Verlag, New York 1982; 33–44
   Google Scholar
• Bartsch G, Schelber K. Tamoxifen treatment in oligospermia. Eur J Urol 1981; 7: 283–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller C G, Nelson W O, Hill J B, Henderson E, Maddock W O, Jungck E C, Paulsen C A, Mortimore G E. Improvement in spermatogenesis following depression of the human testis with testosterone. Fertil Steril 1950; 1: 415–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schill W ‐B. Medical treatment of male infertility. Infertility—Male and Femane, V Insler, B Lunenfeld. Churchill‐Livingstone, London 1984; 533–73
   Google Scholar
• Schill W ‐B. Treatment of ideopathic oligozoospermia by kallikrein: results of a double‐blind study. Arch Androl 1979; 2: 163–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkay J, Harpaz‐Kerpel S, Ben‐Ezra S, Gordon S, Zuckerman H. The prostaglandin inhibitor effect of antiinflammatory drugs in the therapy of male infertility. Fertil Steril 1984; 42: 406–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrama P, Baraghini G F, Carani C, Celanl M F, Glovenco P, Grand) F., Montaninl V. Further studies on the effect of pentoxifyline on sperm count and sperm motility in patients with ideopathic oligoastenozoospermia. Andrologia 1985; 17: 612–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigersky R A, Glass A R. Effect of delta‐1‐testolactone on the pituitary‐testicular axis in oligospermic men. J Clin Endocrin Metab 1981; 52: 897–902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Confino E, Frlberg J, Dudkiewicz A B, Gleicher N. Intrauterine inseminations with washed human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 55–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matson P L, Turner S R, Yovich J M, et al. Oligospermic infertility treated by in‐vitro fertilization. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 26: 84–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Edwards R G, Fehilly C B, Fishel S B, Hewitt J, Rowland G F, Steptoe P C, Walters D E, Webster J. Treatment of male infertility by in vitro fertilization: factors affecting fertilization and pregnancy. Acta Eur Fertil 1984; 15: 455–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibbons W. In‐vitro fertilization as therapy for male‐factor infertility. Urol Clinics North Am 1987; 14: 563–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tournaye H, Camus M, Khan I, Staesses C, Van Stelrteghem A C, Devroey P. In‐vitro fertilization, gameteor zygote intra‐fallopian transfer for the treatment of male infertility. Hum Fleprod 1991; 6: 263–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palermo G, Devroey P, Camus M, De Grauwe E, Khan I, Staessen C, Wisa A, Van Stelrteghem A C. Zygote intrafallopian transfer as an alternative treatment for male infertility. Hum Fleprod 1989; 4: 412–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinting A, Comhaire F, Vermeulen L, Dhont M, Vermeulen A, Vandekerckhove D. Possibilities and limitations of techniques of assisted reproduction for the treatment of male infertility. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 544–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedemann R, Noss U, Hepp H. Gamete intra‐fallopian transfer in male subfertility. Hum Reprod 1989; 4: 408–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers B J, Bentwood B J, Campen H V, Helmbrecht G, Soderdahl D, Hale R W. Sperm morphology assessment as an indicator of human fertilizing capacity. J Androl 1983; 4: 119–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marsh S K, Bolton V N, Braude P R. The effects of morphology on the ability of human spermatozoa to penetrate zona‐free hamster oocytes. Hum Reprod 1987; 2: 499–503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeyendran R S, Schrader S M, Van der Ven H H, Berg J, Perez‐Pelaez M, Al‐Hasanl S, Zaneveld L JD. Association of the in‐vitro fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa with sperm morphology as assessed by three classification systems. Hum Reprod 1986; 1: 305–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken R J, Best F SM, Richardson D W, Djahanbakhch O, Lees M M. The correlates of fertilizing capacity in normal fertile men. Fertil Steril 1982; 38: 68–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeulin C, Feneux D, Serres C, Jouannet P, Guillet‐Rosso F, Belalsch‐Allart J, Frydman R, Testart J. Sperm factors related to failure of human in‐vitro fertilization. J Reprod Fertil 1986; 76: 735–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Ven H H, Perez‐Palaez M, Sobrero A J, Jeyendran R S, Zaneveld L JD. Does sperm motility reflect the potential penetrating capacity?. Int J Fertil 1986; 31: 223–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swerdloff R S, Wang C, Kandeel F R. Evaluation of the infertile couple. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1988; 17: 301–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken R J, Best F SM, Richardson D W, Djahanbakhch O, Templeton A, Lees M M. An analysis of semen quality and sperm function in cases of oligozoospermia. Fertil Steril 1982; 38: 705–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourrouillou G, Mansat A, Calvas P, Pontonnler F, Colombies P. Anomalies chromosomiques et infertilité masculine. Etude de 1444 sujets. Bull de Lássoc des Anatom 1987; 71: 29–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abyholm T. Azoospermia and oligozoospermia. Etiology and clinical findings. Arch Androl 1983; 10: 57–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelson L. Congenital anomalies of the ductus deferens and epididymis. J Urol 1949; 61: 384–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller‐Tyl E, Deutinger J, Relnthaller A. In vitro fertilization with spermatozoa from alloplastic spermatocele. Fertil Steril 1990; 53: 744–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoysman R. Epididymal causes of male infertility: pathogenesis and management. Progress in Reproductive Biology, Pathology and Pathophysiology of the Epididymis, C G Bollack, A Clavert. Karger, Basel 1981; 102–9
   Google Scholar
• Silber S J, Rodriguez‐Rigau L J. Quantitative analysis of testicle biopsy: determination of partial obstruction and prediction of sperm count after surgery for obstruction. Fertil Steril 1981; 36: 480–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball R Y, Mitchinson M J. Obstructive lesions of the genital tract in men. J Reprod Fertil 1984; 70: 667–73
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hendry W F, Parslow J M, Stedronska J. Exploratory scrototomy in 168 azoospermic males. Br J Urol 1983; 55: 785–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jequler A M, Holmes S C. Aetiological factors in the production of obstructive azoospermia. Br J Urol 1984; 56: 540–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White R D, Paulsen D. Obstruction of the male reproductive tract. J Urol 1977; 118: 266–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenknecht L V. Obstruction in the male reproductive tract. Treatment of Male Infertility, J Bain, W B Schill, L Schwarzstein. Springer‐Verlag, New York 1982; 221–7
   Google Scholar
• Porch P P, Jr. Aspermia owing to obstruction of distal ejaculatory duct and treatment by transurethral resection. J Urol 1978; 119: 141–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldwasser B Z, Weinerth J L, Carson C. C., III. Ejaculatory duct obstruction: the case for aggressive diagnosis and treatment. J Urol 1985; 134: 964–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvis K, Brekke I, Tollefsrud A. Epididymal secretory function in men with asthenoteratozoospermia. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 850–1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor V J. The mechanical aspects of surgical correction of male sterility. Proceedings of the First World Congress on Fertility and Sterility. 1953
   Google Scholar
• Lee H Y. Corrective surgery of obstructive azoospermia. Arch Androl 1978; 1: 115–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoysman R. Vaso‐epididymostomy: a survey of techniques and results with considerations of delay of appearance of spermatozoa after surgery. Acta Europaea Fertilitatis 1990; 21: 239–45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silber S J. Microscopic vasoepididymostomy: specific microanastomosis to the epididymal tubule. Fertil Steril 1978; 30: 565–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas A J. Vasoepididymostomy. Urol Clinics North America 1987; 14: 527–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenknecht L V. Ten years experience with microsurgical epididymostomy: results and proposition of a new technique. J Androl 1985; 6: 26–32
   Google Scholar