Evaluation of the Corneal Layers in Meibomian-Gland-Dysfunction-Related Dry Eye by In Vivo Slit-Scanning Confocal Microscopy

REFERENCES

• Knop E, Knop N, Millar T, Obata H, Sullivan DA. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: Report of the subcommittee on anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the meibomian gland. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:1938–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson JD, Shimazaki J, Benitez-del-Castillo JM, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: Report of the definition and classification subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:1930–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulley JP, Shine WE. Meibomian gland function and the tear lipid layer. The Ocular Surface 2003;1:97–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arciniega JC, Wojtowicz JC, Mohamed EM, McCulley JP. Changes in the evaporation rate of tear film after digital expression of meibomian glands in patients with and without dry eye. Cornea 2011;30:843–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimazaki J, Sakata M, Tsubota K. Ocular surface changes and discomfort in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction. Archives of Ophthalmology 1995;113:1266–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathers WD, Shields WJ, Sachdev MS, Petroll WM, Jester JV. Meibomian gland dysfunction in chronic blepharitis. Cornea 1991;10:277–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsuhaibani AH, Carter KD, Abramoff MD, Nerad JA. Utility of meibography in the evaluation of meibomian glands morphology in normal and diseased eyelids. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2011;25:61–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kobayashi A, Yokogawa H, Sugiyama K. In vivo laser confocal microscopy of Bowman’s layer of the cornea. Ophthalmology 2006;113:2203–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhatem A, Cavalcanti B, Hamrah P. In vivo confocal microscopy in dry eye disease and related conditions. Semin Ophthalmol 2012;27:138–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Can I Can B. Konfokal mikroskobi ve i̇n vivo oftalmik kullanımı. Oftalmoloji 1995;3:258–261.
   Google Scholar
• Villani E, Baudouin C, Efron N, et al. In vivo confocal microscopy of the ocular surface: From bench to bedside. Current Eye Research 2014;39:213–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemp MA, Foulks GN. The definition and classification of dry eye disease: Report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). The Ocular Surface 2007;5:75–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villani E, Galimberti D, Del Papa N, Nucci P, Ratiglia R. Inflammation in dry eye associated with rheumatoid arthritis: Cytokine and in vivo confocal microscopy study. Innate Immun 2013;19:420–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi A, Yoshita T, Sugiyama K. In vivo findings of the bulbar/palpebral conjunctiva and presumed meibomian glands by laser scanning confocal microscopy. Cornea 2005;24:985–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villani E, Magnani F, Viola F, et al. In vivo confocal evaluation of the ocular surface morpho-functional unit in dry eye. Optom Vis Sci 2013;90:576–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bron AJ, Benjamin L, Snibson GR. Meibomian gland disease: Classification and grading of lid changes. Eye 1991;5 (Pt 4):395–411.
   Google Scholar
• McCulley JP, Dougherty JM, Deneau DG. Classification of chronic blepharitis. Ophthalmology 1982;89:1173–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foulks GN, Bron AJ. Meibomian gland dysfunction: A clinical scheme for description, diagnosis, classification, and grading. The Ocular Surface 2003;1:107–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ibrahim OM, Matsumoto Y, Dogru M, et al. The efficacy, sensitivity, and specificity of in vivo laser confocal microscopy in the diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction. Ophthalmology 2010;117:665–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea 2003;22(7):640–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathers WD. Why the eye becomes dry: A cornea and lacrimal gland feedback model. CLAO J 2000;26:159–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bron AJ, Smith JA, Calonge M. Methodologies to diagnose and monitor dry eye disease: report of the Diagnostic Methodology Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). The Ocular Surface, 5(2), 108–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bron AJ, Yokoi N, Gafney E, Tiffany JM. Predicted phenotypes of dry eye: Proposed consequences of its natural history. Ocul Surf 2009 Apr;7(2):78–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols KK, Foulks GN, Bron AJ, et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: Executive summary. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:1922–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwath-Winter J, Berghold A, Schmut O, et al. Evaluation of the clinical course of dry eye syndrome. Archives of Ophthalmology 2003;121:1364–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamaguchi M, Kutsuna M, Uno T, Zheng X, Kodama T, Ohashi Y. Marx line: Fluorescein staining line on the inner lid as indicator of meibomian gland function.Am J Ophthalmol 2006 Apr;141(4):669–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neil L, Beatrice BP, Johan G, et al. Laser-scanning in vivo confocal microscopy of the cornea: Imaging and analysis methods for preclinical and clinical applications. In: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; Chapter 4. Linköping, Sweden: Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Villani E, Galimberti D, Viola F, Mapelli C, Ratiglia R. The cornea in Sjogren’s syndrome: An in vivo confocal study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:2017–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosal BM, Ornek N, Zilelioglu G, Elhan AH. Morphology of corneal nerves and corneal sensation in dry eye: A preliminary study. Eye 2005;19:1276–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederer RL, McGhee CN. Clinical in vivo confocal microscopy of the human cornea in health and disease. Prog Retin Eye Res 2010;29:30–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benitez del Castillo JM, Wasfy MA, Fernandez C, Garcia-Sanchez J. An in vivo confocal masked study on corneal epithelium and subbasal nerves in patients with dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:3030–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou AG, Kaufman SC, Kaufman HE, Beuerman RW. Clinical corneal confocal microscopy. Surv Ophthalmol 2006;51:482–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchino M, Uchino Y, Dogru M, et al. Dry eye disease and work productivity loss in visual display users: The Osaka study. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;157:294–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JJ, Rao K, Pflugfelder SC. Corneal epithelial opacity in dysfunctional tear syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;148:376–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Chen Q, Chen W, Cui L, Ma H, Lu F. Tear dynamics and corneal confocal microscopy of subjects with mild self-reported office dry eye. Ophthalmology 2011;118:902–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benitez-Del-Castillo JM, Acosta MC, Wassfi MA, et al. Relation between corneal innervation with confocal microscopy and corneal sensitivity with noncontact esthesiometry in patients with dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:173–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhatem A, Cavalcanti B, Hamrah P. In vivo confocal microscopy in dry eye disease and related conditions. Semin Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep–Nov;27(5–6):138–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szaflik JP. Comparison of in vivo confocal microscopy of human cornea by white light scanning slit and laser scanning systems. Cornea 2007 May;26(4):438–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar