Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy with Radiofrequency versus Classic Diathermy

REFERENCES

• Filingeri V, Casciani CU. Submucosal haemorrhoidectomy via radiosurgical scalpel: a new technique. Int J Surg Sci. 1997;4:50–53.
   Google Scholar
• Filingeri V, Gravante G, Baldessari E, A randomised trial comparing submucosal haemorrhoidectomy with radiofrequency bistoury vs. diathermic haemorrhoidectomy. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2004;8:79–85.
   Google Scholar
• Filingeri V, Gravante G, Cassisa D. Radiofrequency Y-V anoplasty in the treatment of anal stenosis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2006;10:263–267.
   Google Scholar
• Filingeri V, Gravante G. Radiofrequency sinus excision. Dig Surg. 2006;23:125.
   Google Scholar
• Filingeri V, Gravante G, Baldessari E, Radiofrequency fistulectomy vs. diathermic fistulotomy for submucosal fistulas: a randomized trial. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2004;8:111–116.
   Google Scholar
• Filingeri V, Gravante G. Radiofrequencies and proctology: a difficult marriage. Digestion. 2005;72:261.
   Google Scholar
• Filingeri V, Gravante G, Baldessari E, Prospective randomized trial of submucosal hemorrhoidectomy with radiofrequency bistoury vs. conventional Parks’ operation. Tech Coloproctol. 2004;8:31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Filingeri V, Gravante G. A prospective randomized trial between subcutaneous lateral internal sphincterotomy with radiofrequency bistoury and conventional parks’ operation in the treatment of anal fissures. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2005;9:175–178.
   Google Scholar
• Filingeri V, Gravante G, Cassisa D. Physics of radiofrequency in proctology. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2005;9:349–354.
   Google Scholar
• Filingeri V, Rosati R, Gravante G, [Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy with a radiofrequency scalpel] Minerva Chirurgica. 2003;58:355–359.
   Google Scholar
• Filingeri V, Gravante G, Cassisa D. Clinical applications of radiofrequency in proctology: a review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2006;10:79–85.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson JA, Heaton JR. Closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1959;2:176–179.
   Google Scholar
• White WF. Radiosurgery: an advancement over the scalpel in many procedures. Podiatr Prod Rep. 1986;3:16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Repacholi MH. Low-level exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: health effects and research needs. Bioelectromagnetics. 1988;19:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta P. Anal fistulotomy by radiofrequency. J Nippon Med Sch. Nihon Ika Daigaku Zasshi. 2004;71:287–291.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta PJ. Sphincterotomy with radio frequency surgery: a new treatment technique of fissure in ano and associated pathologies. Rom J Gastroenterol. 2003;12:37–40.
   Google Scholar
• Pescatori M. [Closed hemorrhoidectomy] Annali Italiani Di Chirurgia. 1995;66:787–790.
   Google Scholar
• Classic articles in colonic and rectal surgery. Edward Thomas Campbell Milligan 1886–1972. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal, and the operative treatment of haemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;28:620–628.
   Google Scholar
• Parks AG. The surgical treatment of haemorrhoids. In: Operative Surgery, Rob C, Smith R, eds. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott; 1969:706–717.
   Google Scholar
• Palazzo FF, Francis DL, Clifton MA. Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 2002;89:154–157.
   Google Scholar
• Jayne DG, Botterill I, Ambrose NS, Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus conventional diathermy for day-case haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 2002;89:428–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo A. Treatment of haemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosal and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular stapling device: a new procedure. In, Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome: Monduzzi, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Trudel JL. [Ferguson's method of closed hemorrhoidectomy] Annales de chirurgie. 1994;48:561–564.
   Google Scholar
• Arbman G, Krook H, Haapaniemi S. Closed vs. open hemorrhoidectomy – is there any difference? Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:31–34.
   Google Scholar
• Mik M, Rzetecki T, Sygut A, Open and closed haemorrhoidectomy for fourth degree haemorrhoids – comparative one center study. Acta Chirurgica Iugoslavica. 2008;55:119–125.
   Google Scholar
• Johannsson HO, Pahlman L, Graf W. Randomized clinical trial of the effects on anal function of Milligan-Morgan versus Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1208–1214.
   Google Scholar
• Gencosmanoglu R, Sad O, Koc D, Hemorrhoidectomy: open or closed technique? A prospective, randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong DN, Ambroze WL, Schertzer ME, Harmonic scalpel vs. electrocautery hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:558–564.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett RC, Friedman MH, Goligher JC. Late results of haemorrhoidectomy by ligature and excision. Br Med J. 1963;2:216–219.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson WH. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg. 1975;62:542–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey HR, Ferguson JA. Prevention of urinary retention by fluid restriction following anorectal operations. Dis Colon Rectum. 1976;19:250–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvati EP, Kleckner MS. Urinary retention in anorectal and colonic surgery. Am J Surg. 1957;94:114–117.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad M L, Abcarian H. Urinary retention following operations for benign anorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum. 1978;21:490–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar