Research Reports: A Study to Compare the Healing of a Plasma-TFE Synthetic Artery in the Dog

References

• Stewart G J, Essa N, Chang K HY. A scanning and transmission electron microscope study of the luminal coating on Dacron prostheses in the canine thoracic aorta. J Lab Clin Med 1975; 85(2)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hong-De Wu, Zammit M, Sauvage L R. The influence of inner wall filamentous-ness on the performance of small and large-caliber arterial grafts. J Vasc Surg 1985; 2: 255–262
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Callow A D, Connolly R, O'Donnell T. Platelet-arterial synthetic graft interaction and its modification. Arch Surg 1982; 117: 1447–1455
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanel K C, McCabe C, Abbott W M. Current PTFE grafts. A biomechanical, scanning electron and light microscopic evaluation. Ann Surg 1982; 195: 456–463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hozumi K, Kitamura K, Kitade T. Hydrophobic coating of solid materials by plasma-polymerized thin film using tetrafluorethylene. Yakugaku Zasshi 1979; 99: 521–572, (abstr)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kitade T, Hozumi K, Kitamura K. Thin film coating by plasma-polymerized tetrafluorethylene onto solid substrates having complex surface structures. Yakugaku Zasshi 1983; 103: 719–725, (abstr)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yasuda H K. Blood surface interaction investigated with ultrathin coatings of glow-discharge polymers applied onto the inner surface of small diameter silastic tubing. Society for Biomtls. Ann. Mtgs., Washington, DC, April, 1984
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkle A M, Hoffman A S, Ratner B D. Effects of a tetrafluorethylene glow discharge on patency of small diameter Dacron vascular prostheses. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1984; 30: 432–439
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffman A S. Surface modification of small diameter Dacron vascular grafts after a tetrafluorethylene glow discharge treatment. Society for Biomatls. Ann. Mtgs., Washington, DC, April, 1984
   Google Scholar
• Orr C, Jr. Application of mercury penetration to materials analysis. Powder Technol 1969/70; 3: 117–123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehl R E. On the characterization of porosity in PTFE-carbon composite implant materials by mercury porosimetry. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16: 715–719
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zissman W A. Relation of the equilibrium contact angle to liquid and solid constitution. Advances in Chemistry Series. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC 1964; 1–51
   Google Scholar
• Baier R E, DePalma V A. The relation of the internal surface of grafts to thrombosis. Management of Arterial Occlusive Disease, WA Dale. Year Book Medical, Chicago 1971; 147–149
   Google Scholar
• Ratner B D. Surface characterization of materials for blood contact applications. Advances in Chemistry Series 199. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC 1982; 9–23
   Google Scholar
• Yates S G, Barros D'Sa A AB, Berger K. The preclotting of porous arterial prostheses. Ann Surg 1978; 188: 611–622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clowes A W. The role of aspirin in enhancing arterial graft patency. J Vasc Surg 1986; 3: 381–386
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bomberger R A, DePalma R G, Ambrose T A. Aspirin and dipyrimadole inhibit endothelial healing. Arch Surg 1982; 117: 1459–1462
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCollum C N, Crow M J, Rajah S M. Antithrombotic therapy for vascular prosthesis: An experimental model testing platelet inhibitory drugs. Surgery 1980; 87: 668–676
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oblath R W, Buckley F O, Green R M. Prevention of platelet aggregation and adherence to prosthetic vascular grafts by aspirin and dipyridamole. Surgery 1978; 84: 37–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford J W. Methods of macroscopic and microscopic analysis of experimentally implanted prosthetic vascular grafts. Biological and Synthetic Vascular Prostheses, J C Stanley, W E Burkel, S M Lindenauer. Grune & Stratton, New York 1982; 257–276
   Google Scholar
• Herring M, Baughman S, Glover J. Endothelial seeding of dacron and polytetrafluorethylene grafts: The cellular events of healing. Surgery 1984; 96: 745–754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison J H, Davalos P A. Influence of porosity on synthetic grafts. Arch Surg 1961; 82: 28–33
   Google Scholar
• Campbell C D, Goldfarb D, Roe K. A small arterial substitute: Expanded microporous polytetrafluorethylene: patency versus porosity. Ann Surg 1975; 182: 138–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming R D, Phillips P A, Singh P I. Surface chemistry and blood material interactions. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1983; 29: 163–168
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Didisheim P, Tirrell M V, Lyons C S. Relative role of surface chemistry and surface texture in blood material interactions. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1983; 30: 169–176
   Google Scholar
• Hess F, Jerusalem C, Grande P. Significance of the inner surface structure of small-caliber prosthetic blood vessels in relation to the development, presence, and fate of a neointima. A morphological evaluation. J Biomed Mater Res 1984; 18: 745–755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark R E, Boyd J C, Moran J F. New principles governing the tissue reactivity of prosthetic materials. J Surg Res 1974; 16: 510–522
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clowes A W, Kirkman T R, Reidy M A. Mechanisms of arterial graft healing: Rapid transmural capillary ingrowth provides a source of intimal endothelium and smooth muscle in porous PTFE prostheses. Am J Pathol 1986; 123: 220–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clowes A W, Gown A M, Hanson S R. Mechanisms of arterial graft failure. I. Role of cellular proliferation in early healing of PTFE prostheses. Am J Pathol 1985; 118: 43–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomura Y. The ultrastructure of the pseudointima lining synthetic arterial grafts in the canine aorta with special reference to the origin of the endothelial cell. J Cardiovasc Surg 1970; 11: 282–291
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Still W JS, Ghani A R, Dennison S M. The organization of isolated mural thrombi in aortic grafts—An electron microscope study. Am J Pathol 1967; 51: 1013–1023
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wesolowski S A, Seaman A R. Growth and differentiation of the endothelial lining of the vascular prosthesis by scanning electron microscopy. J Abd Surg 1971; 48: 219–224
   Google Scholar
• Guidoin R, Gosselin C, Martin L. Polyester prostheses as substitutes in the thoracic aorta of dogs. I. Evaluation of commercial prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 1983; 17: 1049–1077
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shepard A D, Gelfand J A, Callow A D. Complement activation by synthetic vascular prostheses. J Vasc Surg 1984; 1: 829–838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greisler H P, Schwarcz T H, Ellinger J. Dacron inhibition of arterial regenerative activities. J Vasc Surg 1986; 3: 747–756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitlick F A. Research and future vascular grafts. Biological and Synthetic Vascular Prostheses, J C Stanley, W E Burkel, S M Linderauer. Grune & Stratton, New York 1982; 1–9
   Google Scholar