References
- Savage D. High court refuses to give dog its day in 2-year legal struggle. Los Angeles Times. 11 Feb, 1989
- Robb J. Can animal use be ethically justified?. Science and Animals: Addressing Contemporary Issues, H Guttman, J Mench, R Simmonds. Scientists Center for Animal Welfare, Bethesda, MD 1989, This address is a revised version of a previously published essay, Material used by permission
- Darwin C. The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals. Authorized edition. Philosophical Library, New York 1955
- Regan T. The Case for Animal Rights. University of California Press, Berkeley 1983
- Los Angeles Times. 75
- Rollin B. Animal Rights and Human Morality. Prometheus, New York 1981; 51
- Singer P. Animal Liberation, 2d ed. Random House, New York 1990, See Also, Singer P. Ten years of animal liberation. NY Review of Books. 17 Jan 1985:46–52.
- , Regan op cit, p 357. Also, pp 15 1ff where he discusses the difference between a “moral agent” and a “moral patient.”
- Stone C. Should Trees Have Standing?. Kaufman, Los Altos, CA 1974, See for a brilliant discussion of the place of natural objects within the natural order for which we should act as surrogates
- Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1971; 1345
- Spinelli J. Reducing pain in laboratory animals, Unpublished paper. By permission. Also, see Kitchell, Erickson, eds. Animal Pain: Perception and Alleviation., Bethesda, MD, American Physiological Society, 1983.
- , A forthcoming report from the National Academy of Sciences Press (Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Research Council) will make a special contribution in addressing the problem of animal pain. Recognition and Alleviation of Pain and Distress in Laboratory Animals.
- Alternatives 10 Animal Use in Research, Testing and Education. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 1986, See
- Progress Report II. The Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, Baltimore, MD Spring, 1984; 2, 3, Also, see The Alternatives Report. Grafton, MA: Center for Animals and Public Policy, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine.
- , Federal Register. Part III. Washington, DC Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Inspection Service. 9 CFR, Parts 1, 2, and 3. Animal Welfare; Proposed Rules. 15 March 1989
- Halverson H. The responsibility of scientists in determination of public policy of the use of animals in biomedical research. Scientific Perspectives on Animal Welfare, Dodds Orlans. Academic, New York 1982; 110, 111
- Rowan A, Rollin B. Animal research–for and against: a philosophical, social and historical perspective. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 1983; 27: 1