A comprehensive evaluation of selected components and processes used in the manufacture of cigarettes: approach and overview

References

• AALAS. (1991). American Association for Laboratory Animals Science policy on the humane care and use of laboratory animals. Lab Anim Sci 41:528
   Google Scholar
• Baker RR. (1999). Smoke chemistry. In: Davis DL, Nielsen MT. (eds.) Tobacco. Production, chemistry and technology. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 398–439
   Google Scholar
• Baker RR. (2002). The development and significance of standards for smoking-machine methodology. Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International 20:23–41
   Google Scholar
• Bates C, McNeill A, Jarvis M, Gray N. (1999). The future of tobacco product regulation and labelling in Europe: implications for the forthcoming European Union directive. Tob Control 8:225–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benowitz NL. (2001). Compensatory smoking of low-yield cigarettes. Risks associated with smoking cigarettes with low machine-measured yields of tar and nicotine. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 13. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, NIH Publication No. 02-5074, October 2001, 39–63
   Google Scholar
• Borgerding M, Klus H. (2005). Analysis of complex mixtures – cigarette smoke. Exp Toxicol Pathol 57:43–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne CL. (1990). The design of cigarettes, 3rd ed. Charlotte, NC: Hoechst Celanese Corporation
   Google Scholar
• Bundesgesetzblatt 1. (1994). Grundsaetzeder Guten Laborpraxis (GLP). Anhang 1 (zu 19a Abs.1) der Neufassung des Chemikaliengesetzes vom 25 Juli 1993
   Google Scholar
• Burns DM, Dybing E, Gray N, et al. (2008). Mandated lowering of toxicants in cigarette smoke: a description of the World Health Organization TobReg proposal. Tob Control 17:132–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmines E, Lemus R, Gaworski C. (2005). Toxicologic evaluation of licorice extract as a cigarette ingredient. Food Chem Toxicol 43:1303–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmines EL. (2002). Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. Part 1: cigarette design, testing approach, and review of results. Food Chem Toxicol 40:77–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmines EL, Gaworski CL. (2005). Toxicological evaluation of glycerin as a cigarette ingredient. Food Chem Toxicol 43:1521–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggins CRE, Edmiston JT, Jerome AM, et al. (2011a). A comprehensive evaluation of the toxicology of cigarette ingredients: essential oils and resins. Inhal Toxicol 23:41–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggins CRE, Fisher MT, Smith DC, Oldham MJ. (2011b). A comprehensive evaluation of the toxicology of cigarette ingredients: cocoa derived ingredients. Inhal Toxicol 23:70–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggins CRE, Frost-Pineda K, Smith DC, Oldham MJ. (2011c). A comprehensive evaluation of the toxicology of cigarette ingredients: aromatic and aliphatic alcohol compounds. Inhal Toxicol 23:141–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggins CRE, Jerome AM, Edmiston JS, Oldham MJ. (2011d). A comprehensive evaluation of the toxicology of cigarette ingredients: aliphatic carbonyl compounds. Inhal Toxicol 23:102–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggins CRE, Liu J, Merski JA, et al. (2011e). A comprehensive evaluation of the toxicology of cigarette ingredients: aliphatic and aromatic carboxylic acids. Inhal Toxicol 23:119–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggins CRE, Merski JA, Oldham MJ. (2011f). A comprehensive evaluation of the toxicology of cigarette ingredients: heterocyclic nitrogen compounds. Inhal Toxicol 23:84–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggins CRE, Sena EJ, Langston TB, Oldham MJ. (2011g). A comprehensive evaluation of the toxicology of cigarette ingredients: aromatic carbonyl compounds. Inhal Toxicol 23:90–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggins CRE, Sena EJ, Oldham MJ. (2011h). A comprehensive evaluation of the toxicology of cigarette ingredients: inorganic compounds. Inhal Toxicol 23:157–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggins CRE, Wagner KA, Werley MS, Oldham MJ. (2011i). A comprehensive evaluation of the toxicology of cigarette ingredients: carbohydrates and natural products. Inhal Toxicol 23:13–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey R, Coggins CRE, Roemer E. (2011). Toxicological assessment of cigarette ingredients. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 61:119–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diana JN, Vaught A. (1990). Research cigarettes. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Printing Services
   Google Scholar
• Djordjevic MV, Stellman SD, Zang E. (2000). Doses of nicotine and lung carcinogens delivered to cigarette smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:106–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dube MF, Green CR. (1982). Methods of collection of smoke for analytical purposes. Rec Adv Tob Sci 8:42–102
   Google Scholar
• Gaworski CL, Oldham MJ, Coggins CRE. (2010). Toxicological considerations on the use of propylene glycol as a humectant in cigarettes. Toxicology 269:54–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaworski CL, Oldham MJ, Wagner KA, et al. (2011a). A comprehensive evaluation of the toxicology of 95 ingredients added individually to experimental cigarettes: approach and methods. Inhal Toxicol 23:1–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaworski CL, Wagner KA, Morton MJ, Oldham MJ. (2011b). Insights from a multi-year program designed to test the impact of ingredients on mainstream cigarette smoke toxicity. Inhal Toxicol 23:172–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond D, Fong G, Cummings K, et al. (2006). Cigarette yields and human exposure: a comparison of alternative testing regimens. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:1495–501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. (2001). Clearing the smoke. Assessing the science base for tobacco harm reduction. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
   Google Scholar
• International Agency for Research on Cancer. (1985). IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk to humans. Volume 37. Tobacco habits other than smoking; betel-quid and areca-nut chewing; and some related nitrosamines. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer
   Google Scholar
• International Agency for Research on Cancer. (1999). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Volume 60. Some Industrial Chemicals. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer
   Google Scholar
• International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2004). Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1191–413
   Google Scholar
• International Conference on Harmonisation. (1995a). Guideline on the need for carcinogenicity studies of pharmaceuticals: S1A. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use; 2009. Geneva, Switzerland: International Conference on Harmonisation
   Google Scholar
• International Conference on Harmonisation. (1995b). Guidance on specific aspects of regulatory genotoxicity tests for pharmaceuticals: S2A. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use; 1995. Geneva, Switzerland: International Conference on Harmonisation
   Google Scholar
• International Conference on Harmonisation. (1997). Genotoxicity: a standard battery for genotoxicity testing of pharmaceuticals: S2B. International Conference on Harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for clinical use; 1997. Geneva, Switzerland: International Conference on Harmonisation
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. (1991a). ISO 3308. Routine analytical cigarette-smoking machine. Definitions and standard conditions. Amended 2000. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. (1991b). ISO 3402. Tobacco and tobacco products – atmosphere for conditioning and testing. Revised 1999. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. (2000a). ISO 4387. Cigarettes -- determination of total and nicotine free dry particulate matter using a routine analytical smoking machine. Amended 2008. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. (2000b). ISO 10315. Cigarettes – determination of nicotine in smoke condensates – gas chromatographic method. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. (2008). Elaboration of guidelines for implementation of Articles 9 and 10 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Progress report of the working group. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization
   Google Scholar
• Lee PN, Forey BA, Fry JS, et al. (2009). Does use of flue-cured rather than blended cigarettes affect international variation in mortality from lung cancer and COPD? Inhal Toxicol 21:404–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemus R, Carmines EL, Van Miert E, et al. (2007). Toxicological comparisons of cigarettes containing different amounts of vanillin. Inhal Toxicol 19:683–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Life Sciences Research Office. (2004). Review of ingredients added to cigarettes. Phase two: scientific criteria for the evaluation of ingredients added to cigarettes. Bethesda, MD: LSRO
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie JL, Crawley C. (1999). Cigarette production and quality assurance. In: Davis DL, Nielsen MT. (eds.) Tobacco. Production, chemistry and technology. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd., 388–97
   Google Scholar
• Norman A. (1999). Cigarette design and materials. In: Davis DL, Nielsen MT. (eds.) Tobacco. Production, chemistry and technology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science, 353–87
   Google Scholar
• Oldham MJ, Haussmann HJ, Gomm W, et al. (2012). Discriminatory power of standard toxicity assays used to evaluate ingredients added to cigarettes. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 62:49–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1981). No. 413. Subchronic inhalation toxicity: 90-day study. OECD Guideline for the testing of chemicals. Paris, France: OECD
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1997). No. 471. Bacterial reverse mutation test. OECD guideline for testing of chemicals. Paris, France: OECD
   Google Scholar
• Rodgman A, Perfetti TA. (2009). The chemical components of tobacco and tobacco smoke. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
   Google Scholar
• Rodgman A. (2011). Problems with the Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee (TPSAC) list of harmful or potentially harmful tobacco and/or tobacco smoke components. Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International 24:258–76
   Google Scholar
• Roemer E, Tewes FJ, Meisgen TJ, et al. (2002). Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. Part 3: in vitro genotoxicity and cytotoxicity. Food Chem Toxicol 40:105–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roemer E, Stabbert R, Rustemeier K, et al. (2004). Chemical composition, cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of smoke from US commercial and reference cigarettes smoked under two sets of machine smoking conditions. Toxicology 195:31–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roemer E, Ottmueller T, Zenzen V, et al. (2009). Cytotoxicity, mutagenicity and tumorigenicity of mainstream smoke from three reference cigarettes machine-smoked to the same yields of total particulate matter per cigarette. Food Chem Toxicol 47:1810–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roemer E, Carchman R. (2011). Limitations of cigarette machine smoking regimens. Toxicol Lett 203:20–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roemer E, Schorp MK, Piadé J-J, et al. (2012). Scientific assessment of the use of sugars as cigarette tobacco ingredients: a review of published and other publicly available studies. Crit Rev Toxicol 42:244–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rustemeier K, Stabbert R, Haussmann H-J, et al. (2002). Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. Part 2: chemical composition of mainstream smoke. Food Chem Toxicol 40:93–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields PG. (2002). Tobacco smoking, harm reduction, and biomarkers. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1435–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shields PG, Connolly GN, Cummings KM, et al. (2011). Providing a science base for the evaluation of tobacco products. Washington, DC: Tobacco Product Assessment Consortium
   Google Scholar
• Thun MJ, Henley SJ, Calle EE. (2002). Tobacco use and cancer: an epidemiologic perspective for geneticists. Oncogene 21:7307–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Congress. (2009). Family smoking prevention and tobacco control act. 123 Stat. 1776. Public Law 111-31-June 22, 2009
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1993). Toxicity testing plan for low ignition-potential cigarettes. Washington, DC: Consumer Product Safety Commission
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1996). Good laboratory practice for nonclinical laboratory studies. 21 C.F.R. 58. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=58. [Last accessed: 17 Oct 2012]
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011a). Draft guidance for industry and FDA staff. Section 905(j) reports: demonstrating substantial equivalence for tobacco products. Food and Drug Administration. January 5. Washington, DC. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/TobaccoProducts/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/UCM239021.pdf. [Last accessed: 17 Oct 2012]
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011b). Draft guidance for industry and FDA staff. Demonstrating the substantial equivalence of a new tobacco product: responses to frequently asked questions. Food and Drug Administration. September 22. Washington, DC. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/TobaccoProducts/ResourcesforYou/ForIndustry/UCM271239.pdf. [Last accessed: 17 Oct 2012]
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2012). Draft guidance for industry: reporting harmful and potentially harmful constituents in tobacco products and tobacco smoke under Section 904(a)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Food and Drug Administration. Docket FDA-2012-D-0049. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ucm297752.htm. [Last accessed: 17 Oct 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Vanscheeuwijck PM, Teredesai A, Terpstra PM, et al. (2002). Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. Part 4: subchronic inhalation toxicity. Food Chem Toxicol 40:113–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar