366
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A comprehensive evaluation of the toxicology of experimental cigarettes manufactured with banded papers

, , , , &
Pages 19-33 | Received 18 Sep 2013, Accepted 08 Oct 2013, Published online: 17 Dec 2013

References

  • AALAS. (1991). American Association for Laboratory Animals Science Policy on the Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Lab Anim Sci 41:91
  • Alpert HR, O'Connor RJ, Spalletta R, Connolly GN. (2010). Recent advances in cigarette ignition propensity research and development. Fire Technol 46:275–89
  • Brunnemann KD, Hoffmann D, Gairola CG, Lee BC. (1994). Low ignition propensity cigarettes: smoke analysis for carcinogens and testing for mutagenic activity of the smoke particulate matter. Food Chem Toxicol 32:917–22
  • Byrd GD, Fowler KW, Hicks RD, et al. (1990). Isotope dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in the determination of benzene, toluene, styrene and acrylonitrile in mainstream cigarette smoke. J Chromatogr 503:359–68
  • Coggins CRE, Fouillet XLM, Lam R, Morgan KT. (1980). Cigarette smoke induced pathology of the rat respiratory tract: a comparison of the effects of the particulate and vapour phases. Toxicology 16:83–101
  • Coggins CRE, Ayres PH, Mosberg AT, et al. (1989). Comparative inhalation study in rats, using a second prototype of a cigarette that heats rather than burns tobacco. Inhal Toxicol 1:197–226
  • Connolly GN, Alpert HR, Rees V, et al. (2005). Effect of the New York State cigarette fire safety standard on ignition propensity, smoke constituents, and the consumer market. Tob Control 14:321–7
  • Côté F, Létourneau C, Mullard G, Voisine R. (2011). Estimation of nicotine and tar yields from human-smoked cigarettes before and after the implementation of the cigarette ignition propensity regulations in Canada. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 61:S51–9
  • Diana JN, Vaught A. (1990). Research cigarettes. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Printing Services
  • Duncan DB. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F-tests. Biometrics 11:1–42
  • Dunnett, CW. (1955). A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Am Stat Assoc 50:1096–121
  • Gaworski CL, Oldham MJ, Wagner KA, et al. (2011). A comprehensive evaluation of the toxicology of 95 ingredients added individually to experimental cigarettes: approach and methods. Inhal Toxicol 23:1–12
  • Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Principles of Belgium. (1988). Belgian Royal Decree concerning the adaptation of the principles of Good Laboratory Practice and the checking of its execution when testing materials. Moniteur Belge of 26 November 1988:16409–12
  • Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) principles of Germany. (1994). Grundsätze der Guten Laborpraxis (GLP). Anhang 1 (zu § 19a Abs.1) der Neufassung des Chemikaliengesetzes vom 25 Juli 1994
  • Haussmann H-J, Anskeit E, Becker D, et al. (1998). Comparison of fresh and room-aged cigarette sidestream smoke in a subchronic inhalation study on rats. Toxicol Sci 41:100–16
  • Hotchkiss JA, Evans WA, Chen BT, et al. (1995). Regional differences in the effects of mainstream cigarette smoke on stored mucosubstances and DNA synthesis in F344 rat nasal respiratory epithelium. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 131:316–24
  • International Organization for Standardization. (1991a). ISO 3402. Tobacco and tobacco products – atmosphere for conditioning and testing. Revised 1999. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO
  • International Organization for Standardization. (1991b). ISO 3308. Routine analytical cigarette-smoking machine. Definitions and standard conditions. Amended 2000. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO
  • International Organization for Standardization. (1994). ISO 10362-2. Cigarettes – determination of water in smoke condensates – Part 2. Karl Fischer method. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO
  • International Organization for Standardization. (2000a). ISO 4387. Cigarettes – determination of total and nicotine free dry particulate matter using a routine analytical smoking machine. Amended 2008. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO
  • International Organization for Standardization. (2000b). ISO 10315. Cigarettes – determination of nicotine in smoke condensates – gas chromatographic method. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO
  • International Organization for Standardization. (2007). ISO 8454. Cigarettes – determination of carbon monoxide in the vapour phase of cigarette smoke – NDIR method. Amended 2009. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO
  • June KM, Hammond D, Sjodin A, et al. (2011). Cigarette ignition propensity, smoking behavior, and toxicant exposure: a natural experiment in Canada. Tob Induc Dis 9:13
  • Lewis DJ. (1981). Factors affecting the distribution of tobacco smoke-induced lesions in the rodent larynx. Toxicol Lett 9:189–94
  • Maron DM, Ames BN. (1983). Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutat Res 113:173–215
  • Ménache MG, Miller FJ, Raabe OG. (1995). Particle inhalability curves for humans and small laboratory animals. Ann Occup Hyg 39:317–28
  • Nanni EJ, Lovette ME, Hicks RD, et al. (1990). Separation and quantitation of phenolic compounds in mainstream cigarette smoke by capillary gas chromatography with mass spectrometry in the selected-ion mode. J Chromatogr 505:365–74
  • Norman V, Ihrig A, inventors. Loews Theatres, Inc., New York, assignee. (1984). Smoking articles having a reduced free burn time. US Patent 4,452,259
  • O'Connor RJ, Rees VW, Norton KJ, et al. (2010). Does switching to reduced ignition propensity cigarettes alter smoking behavior or exposure to tobacco smoke constituents? Nicotine Tob Res 12:1011–18
  • OECD. (1997a). Principles of good laboratory practice, OECD [C(97)186/Final]. Paris, France: OECD
  • OECD. (1997b). No. 471. Bacterial reverse mutation test. OECD guideline for testing of chemicals. Paris, France: OECD
  • Oldham MJ, Haussmann HJ, Gomm W, et al. (2012). Discriminatory power of standard toxicity assays used to evaluate ingredients added to cigarettes. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 62:49–61
  • Putnam KP, Bombick DW, Doolittle DJ. (2002). Evaluation of eight in vitro assays for assessing the cytotoxicity of cigarette smoke condensate. Toxicol In Vitro 16:599–607
  • Raabe OG, Al-Bayati MA, Teague SV, Rasolt A. (1988). Regional deposition of inhaled monodisperse coarse and fine aerosol particles in small laboratory animals. Ann Occup Hyg 32:53–63
  • Roemer E, Stabbert R, Rustemeier K, et al. (2004). Chemical composition, cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of smoke from US commercial and reference cigarettes smoked under two sets of machine smoking conditions. Toxicology 195:31–52
  • Smith G, Wilton LV, Binns R. (1978). Sequential changes in the structure of the rat respiratory system during and after exposure to cigarette smoke. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 46:579–91
  • Theophilus EH, Shreve WK, Ayres PH, et al. (2007a). Comparative 13-week cigarette smoke inhalation study in Sprague-Dawley rats: evaluation of cigarettes with two banded cigarette paper technologies. Food Chem Toxicol 45:1076–90
  • Theophilus EH, Pence DH, Meckley DR, et al. (2007b). Toxicological evaluation of cigarettes with two banded cigarette paper technologies. Exp Toxicol Pathol 59:17–27
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1993). Toxicity testing plan for low ignition-potential cigarettes. Washington, DC: Consumer Product Safety Commission
  • Ungar K. (1992). The INVITTOX data bank of in-vitro techniques in toxicology. Hum Exp Toxicol 11:151–4
  • Walker D, Wilton LV, Binns R. (1978a). Inhalation toxicity studies on cigarette smoke VII. 6-week comparative experiments using modified flue-cured cigarettes: histopathology of the conducting airways. Toxicology 10:241–59
  • Walker D, Wilton LV, Binns R. (1978b). Inhalation toxicity studies on cigarette smoke VI. 6-week comparative experiments using modified flue-cured cigarettes: histopathology of the lung. Toxicology 10:229–40
  • Zar JH. (1984). Biostatistical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.