The Handan Eye Study: Comparison of Screening Methods for Primary Angle Closure Suspects in a Rural Chinese Population

REFERENCES

• Foster PJ, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in China: how big is the problem? Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85(11):1277–1282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90(3):262–267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya’ale D, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ 2004;82(11):844–851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80(5):389–393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook C, Foster PJ. Epidemiology of glaucoma: what’s new? Can J Ophthalmol 2012;47(3):223–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, et al. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86(2):238–242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas R, Parikh R, Muliyil J, et al. Five-year risk of progression of primary angle closure to primary angle closure glaucoma: a population-based study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003;81(5):480–485
   Google Scholar
• Thomas R, George R, Parikh R, et al. Five year risk of progression of primary angle closure suspects to primary angle closure: a population based study. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87(4):450–454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang LP, Aung T, Chua WH, et al. Visual field loss from primary angle-closure glaucoma: a comparative study of symptomatic and asymptomatic disease. Ophthalmology 2004;111(9):1636–1640
   Google Scholar
• Thomas R, Sekhar GC, Parikh R. Primary angle closure glaucoma: a developing world perspective. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2007;35(4):374–378
   Google Scholar
• Thomas R, Arun T, Muliyil J, et al. Outcome of laser peripheral iridotomy in chronic primary angle closure glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1999;30(7):547–553
   Google Scholar
• Nolan WP, Foster PJ, Devereux JG, et al. YAG laser iridotomy treatment for primary angle closure in East Asian eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84(11):1255–1259
   Google Scholar
• Alsagoff Z, Aung T, Ang LP, et al. Long-term clinical course of primary angle-closure glaucoma in an Asian population. Ophthalmology 2000;107(12):2300–2304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas R, Parikh R, Paul P, et al. Population-based screening versus case detection. Indian J Ophthalmol 2002;50(3):233–237
   Google Scholar
• Friedman DS, He M. Anterior chamber angle assessment techniques. Surv Ophthalmol 2008;53(3):250–273
   Google Scholar
• Lavanya R, Foster PJ, Sakata LM, et al. Screening for narrow angles in the Singapore population: evaluation of new noncontact screening methods. Ophthalmology 2008;115(10):1720–1727
   Google Scholar
• Grewal DS, Brar GS, Jain R, et al. Comparison of Scheimpflug imaging and spectral domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography for detection of narrow anterior chamber angles. Eye (Lond) 2011;25(5):603–611
   Google Scholar
• Baskaran M, Oen FT, Chan YH, et al. Comparison of the scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer and the modified van Herick grading system in the assessment of angle closure. Ophthalmology 2007;114(3):501–506
   Google Scholar
• Stamper RL. Glaucoma screening. J Glaucoma 1998;7(3):149–150
   Google Scholar
• Kashiwagi K, Tokunaga T, Iwase, et al. Agreement between peripheral anterior chamber depth evaluation using the van Herick technique and angle width evaluation using the Shaffer system in Japanese. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2005;49(2):134–136
   Google Scholar
• Foster PJ, Devereux JG, Alsbirk PH, et al. Detection of gonioscopically occludable angles and primary angle closure glaucoma by estimation of limbal chamber depth in Asians: modified grading scheme. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84(2):186–192
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas R, George T, Braganza A, Muliyil J. The flashlight test and van Herick’s test are poor predictors for occludable angles. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1996;24(3):251–256
   Google Scholar
• Van Herick W, Shaffer RN, Schwartz A. Estimation of width of angle of anterior chamber. Incidence and significance of the narrow angle. Am J Ophthalmol 1969;68(4):626–629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan S, Rollins AM, Roth JE, et al. Real time optical coherence tomography of the anterior segment at 1310 nm. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119(8):1179–1185
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nolan WP, See JL, Chew PT, et al. Detection of primary angle closure using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in Asian eyes. Ophthalmology 2007;114(1):33–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurita N, Mayama C, Tomidokoro A, et al. Potential of the Pentacam in screening for primary angle closure and primary angle closure suspect. J Glaucoma 2009;18(7):506–512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashiwagi K, Kashiwagi F, Toda Y, et al. A newly developed peripheral anterior chamber depth analysis system: principle, accuracy, and reproducibility. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88(8):1030–1035
   Google Scholar
• Kashiwagi K, Abe K, Tsukahara S. Quantitative evaluation of changes in anterior segment biometry by peripheral laser iridotomy using newly developed scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88(8):1035–1040
   Google Scholar
• Kashiwagi K, Tokunaga T, Iwase A, et al. Usefulness of peripheral anterior chamber depth assessment in glaucoma screening. Eye 2005;19(9):990–994
   Google Scholar
• Kashiwagi K, Kashiwagi F, Hiejima Y, et al. Finding cases of angle-closure glaucoma in clinic setting using a newly developed instrument. Eye 2006;20(3):319–324
   Google Scholar
• Liang YB, Friedman DS, Wong TY, et al. Rationale, design, methodology, and baseline data of a population-based study in rural China: the Handan Eye Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2009;16(2):115–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashiwagi K, Chiba T, Mabuchi F, et al. Five-year incidence of angle closure among glaucoma health examination participants. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013;251(4):1219–1228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devereux JG, Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, et al. Anterior chamber depth measurement as a screening tool for primary angle-closure glaucoma in an East Asian population. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118(2):257–263
   Google Scholar
• Nolan WP, Aung T, Machin D, et al. Detection of narrow angles and established angle closure in Chinese residents of Singapore: potential screening tests. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141(5):896–901
   Google Scholar
• Wong HT, Chua JL, Sakata LM, et al. Comparison of slitlamp optical coherence tomography and scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer to evaluate angle closure in Asian eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127(5):599–603
   Google Scholar
• Momont AC, Mills RP. Glaucoma screening: current perspectives and future directions. Semin Ophthalmol 2013;28(3):185–190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao JL. To strength the opportunistic screening for primary glaucoma. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2010;46(6):481–484
   Google Scholar
• Thomas R, Muliyil JP, George R. Relevance of angle closure in Asians. Br J Ophthalmol 2000. http://bjo.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/84/2/186#8
   Google Scholar
• Rao GN. An infrastructure model for the implementation of VISION 2020: the right to sight. Can J Ophthalmol 2004;39(6):589–590,593–594
   Google Scholar
• Thomas R, Naveen S, Nirmalan PK, et al. Detection of ocular disease by a vision-centre technician and the role of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in this setting. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94(2):214–218
   Google Scholar
• Walland MJ, Thomas R. ‘So what’s our angle on this’? Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2010;38(8):743–744
   Google Scholar