1,355
Views
31
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Perspectives on social media in and as research: A synthetic review

&
Pages 85-96 | Received 05 Dec 2014, Accepted 14 Jan 2015, Published online: 05 Mar 2015

References

  • Allen, H.G., Stanton, T.R., Di Pietro, F., & Moseley, G.L. (2013). Social media release increases dissemination of original articles in the clinical pain sciences. PloS One, 8, e68914.
  • Attwell, G. (2007). Personal learning environments – The future of elearning? eLearning Papers, 2, 1–8.
  • Archibald, M.M., & Clark, A.M. (2014). Twitter and nursing research: How diffusion of innovation theory can help uptake. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70, e3–5.
  • Baker, S. (2013). Conceptualising the use of Facebook in ethnographic research: As tool, as data and as context. Ethnography and Education, 8, 131–145.
  • Balfe, M., Doyle, F., & Conroy, R. (2012). Using Facebook to recruit young adults for qualitative research projects: How difficult is it? Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 30, 511–515.
  • Bartling, S., & Friesike, S. (2014). Towards another scientific revolution. In S. Bartling, & S. Friesike, Opening Science. Berlin: Springer Open, pp.44, 1–12.
  • Boyd, D. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2012). Researching news discussion on Twitter. Journalism Studies, 13, 801–814.
  • Bruns, A., & Stieglitz, S. (2013). Towards more systematic Twitter analysis: Metrics for tweeting activities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16, 91–108.
  • Bull, S.S., Breslin, L.T., Wright, E.E., Black, S.R., Levine, D., & Santelli, J.S. (2011). Case study: An ethics case study of HIV prevention research on Facebook: The Just/Us study. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 36, 1082–1092.
  • Bull, S.S., Levine, D., Schmiege, S., & Santelli, J. (2013). Recruitment and retention of youth for research using social media: Experiences from the Just/Us study. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 8, 171–181. doi:10.1080/17450128.2012.748238
  • Cann, A., Dimitriou, K., & Hooley, T. (2011). Social Media: A Guide for Researchers (pp.1–46). London: Research Information Network.
  • Child, R., Mentes, J., & Phillips, L. (2014). Using Facebook and participant information clips to recruit emergency nurses for research. Nurse Res, 21, 2010–2015.
  • Czerniewicz, L. (2013). Power and politics in a changing scholarly communication landscape.. Paper 23. In Proceedings of the IATUL Conferences Purdue University,Purdue ePubs. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2013/papers/23
  • Dantonio, L., Makri, S., & Blandford, A. (2012). Coming across academic social media content serendipitously. In Association for Information, Science and Technology 2012 Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Das, S., McCaffrey, P.G., Talkington, M.W.T., Andrews, N.A., Corlosquet, S., Ivinson, A.J., & Clark, T. (2014). Pain research forum: Application of scientific social media frameworks in neuroscience. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 8, 21.
  • Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.
  • Eastham, L.A. (2011). Research using blogs for data: Public documents or private musings? Research in Nursing and Health, 34, 353–361.
  • Edwards, A., Housley, W., Williams, M., Sloan, L., & Williams, M. (2013). Digital social research, social media and the sociological imagination: Surrogacy, augmentation and re-orientation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16, 245–260.
  • Facebook. (2014). Facebook's Privacy Policy. Retrieved 27 October 2014 from https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id = %20322194465300
  • Fausto, S., Machado, F.A, Bento, L.F.J., Iamarino, A., Nahas, T.R., & Munger, D.S. (2012). Research blogging: Indexing and registering the change in science 2.0. PloS One, 7, e50109.
  • Ford, K.C., Veletsianos, G., & Resta, P. (2014). The structure and characteristics of #PhDChat, an emergent online social network. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 8. doi.org/10.5334/2014-08.
  • Fordis, M., Street, R.L., Volk, R.J., & Smith, Q. (2011). The prospects for Web 2.0 technologies for engagement, communication, and dissemination in the era of patient-centered outcomes research: Selected articles developed from the Eisenberg Conference Series 2010 Meeting. Journal of Health Communication, 16(Suppl.1), 3–9.
  • Foulkes, M. (2011). Social contexts, social media, and human subjects research. American Journal of Bioethics, 11, 35–6
  • Gardois, P., Colombi, N., Grillo, G., & Villanacci, M.C. (2012). Implementation of Web 2.0 services in academic, medical and research libraries: A scoping review. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 29, 90–109.
  • Gies, J., & Martino, S. (2014). Uncovering ED: A qualitative analysis of personal blogs managed by individuals with eating disorders. Qualitative Report, 19, 1–15.
  • Giglietto, F., Rossi, L., & Bennato, D. (2012). The open laboratory: Limits and possibilities of using Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube as a research data source. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30, 145–159.
  • Golder, S.A, & Macy, M.W. (2013). Social media as a research environment. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16, 627–628.
  • Greenhow, C., & Gleason, B. (2014). Social scholarship: Reconsidering scholarly practices in the age of social media. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 392–402.
  • Grosseck, G., & Holotescu, C. (2011). Academic research in 140 characters or less. Paper presented at the 7th international scientific conference‘eLearning and Software for Education’ eLSE, Bucharest, April 28–29.
  • Gruzd, A., Black, F.A., Ngoc, T., Le, Y., & Amos, K. (2012a). Investigating biomedical research literature in the blogosphere: A case study of diabetes and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 100 34–42.
  • Gruzd, A., Staves, K., & Wilk, A. (2012b). Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2340–2350.
  • Harricharan, M., & Bhopal, K. (2014). Using blogs in qualitative educational research: An exploration of method. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 37, 324–343.
  • Hawksey, M. (2013, February 15). Twitter Archiving Google Spreadsheet TAGS v5 [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://mashe.hawksey.info/2013/02/twitter-archive-tagsv5/
  • Heaivilin, N., Gerbert, B., Page, J.E., & Gibbs, J.L. (2011). Public health surveillance of dental pain via Twitter. Journal of Dental Research, 90, 1047–1051.
  • Hemsley, B., Palmer, S., & Balandin, S. (2014). Tweet reach: A research protocol for using Twitter to increase information exchange in people with communication disabilities. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17, 84–89.
  • Henderson, M., Johnson, N.F., & Auld, G. (2013). Silences of ethical practice: Dilemmas for researchers using social media. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 546–560.
  • Ho, K. (2014). Harnessing the social web for health and wellness: Issues for research and knowledge translation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16, e34.
  • Kapp, J.M., Peters, C., & Oliver, D.P. (2013). Research recruitment using Facebook advertising: Big potential, big challenges. Journal of Cancer Education, 28, 134–137.
  • Kaye, J., Curren, L., Anderson, N., Edwards, K., Fullerton, S.M., Kanellopoulou, N., .. Winter, S.F. (2012). Science and society: From patients to partners: Participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research. Nature, 13, 371–376.
  • King, D., Ramirez-Cano, D., Greaves, F., Vlaev, I., Beales, S., & Darzi, A. (2013). Twitter and the health reforms in the English National Health Service. Health Policy, 110, 291–297.
  • Konijn, E.A., Veldhuis, J., & Plaisier, X.S. (2013). YouTube as a research tool: Three approaches. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16, 695–701.
  • Koskan, A., Klasko, L., Davis, S.N., Gwede, C.K., Wells, K.J., Kumar, A., … Meade, C.D. (2014). Use and taxonomy of social media in cancer-related research: A systematic review. American Journal of Public Health, 104, e20–37.
  • Kumar, M.J. (2014). Expanding the boundaries of your research using social media: Stand-up and be counted. IETE Technical Review, 31(4), 255–257.
  • Kwok, R. (2013). Research impact: Altmetrics make their mark. Nature, 500, 491–493. doi:10.1038/nj7463-491a
  • Leonard, A., Hutchesson, M., Patterson, A., Chalmers, K., & Collins, C. (2014). Recruitment and retention of young women into nutrition research studies: Practical considerations. Trials, 15, 23.
  • Leung, E.Y.L., Tirlapur, S.A., Siassakos, D., & Khan, K.S. (2013). #BlueJC: BJOG and Katherine Twining Network collaborate to facilitate post-publication peer review and enhance research literacy via a Twitter journal club. BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 120, 657–660.
  • Lipset, C.H. (2014). Engage with research participants about social media. Nature Medicine, 20, 231. doi:10.1038/nm0314-231
  • Lomborg, S. (2012). Researching communicative practice: Web archiving in qualitative social media research. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30, 219–231.
  • Mandavilli, A. (2011). Trial by Twitter. Nature, 469, 20.
  • McKee, R. (2013). Ethical issues in using social media for health and health care research. Health Policy, 110, 298–301.
  • Mendeley. (2014). Groups. Retrieved 6 November 2014 from http://www.mendeley.com/groups/search/?query = %22mental+ health%22&page = 0
  • Moreno, M.A., Jelenchick, L.A., Egan, K.G., Cox, E., Young, H., Gannon, K.E., & Becker, T. (2011). Feeling bad on Facebook: Depression disclosures by college students on a social networking site. Depression and Anxiety, 28, 447–455. doi:10.1002/da.20805
  • Moreno, M.A., Grant, A., Kacvinsky, L., Moreno, P., & Fleming, M. (2012). Older adolescents’ views regarding participation in Facebook research. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51, 439–444.
  • Moreno, M.A., Goniu, N., Moreno, P.S., & Diekema, D. (2013). Ethics of social media research: Common concerns and practical considerations. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16, 708–713.
  • Morris, R. (2013). ‘Unjust, inhumane and highly inaccurate’: The impact of changes to disability benefits and services – Social media as a tool in research and activism. Disability and Society, 28, 724–728.
  • Mychasiuk, R., & Benzies, K. (2012). Facebook: An effective tool for participant retention in longitudinal research. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38, 753–756.
  • Naslund, J.A., Grande, S.W., Aschbrenner, K.A., & Elwyn, G. (2014). Naturally occurring peer support through social media: The experiences of individuals with severe mental illness using YouTube. PloS One, 9, e110171. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110171
  • Nicholas, P.D., & Rowlands, I. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Information Services and Use, 31, 61–83.
  • Nickson, C. (2014, February 6). FOAM [Blog post] Retrieved 6 November 2014 from http://lifeinthefastlane.com/foam/
  • O’Connor, A., Jackson, L., Goldsmith, L., & Skirton, H. (2014). Can I get a retweet please? Health research recruitment and the Twittersphere. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(3), 599–609.
  • O’Connor, D. (2013). The apomediated world: Regulating research when social media has changed research. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 41, 470–483.
  • Ovadia, S. (2009). Exploring the potential of Twitter as a research tool. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian, 28, 202–205.
  • Ovadia, S. (2013). When social media meets scholarly publishing. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian, 32, 194–198.
  • Parsi, K., & Elster, N. (2014). Conducting research on social media – Is Facebook like the public square? American Journal of Bioethics, 14, 63–65.
  • Procter, R., Williams, R., & Stewart, J. (2010). If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use Web 2.0. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 368, 4039–4056.
  • Quinton, S. (2013). The digital era requires new knowledge to develop relevant CRM strategy: A cry for adopting social media research methods to elicit this new knowledge. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 21, 402–412.
  • Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Russell, B., Canty, N. & Watkinson, A. (2011). Social media in the research workflow. Learned Publishing, 24, 183–195.
  • Shema, H., Bar-Ilan, J., & Thelwall, M. (2012). Research blogs and the discussion of scholarly information. PloS One, 7, e35869.
  • Smith, R. (2010). Classical peer review: An empty gun. Breast Cancer Research, 12, S13.
  • Skeptical Scalpel. (2014, October 4) Should social media accomplishments be recognized by academia? [Blog post]. Retrieved 8 January 2015 from http://skepticalscalpel.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/should-social-media-accomplishments-be.html
  • Swirsky, E.S., Hoop, J.G., & Labott, S. (2014). Using social media in research: New ethics for a new meme? American Journal of Bioethics, 14, 60–61.
  • Symplur. (2014). Why the Healthcare Hashtag Project? Retrieved 26 October 2014 from http://www.symplur.com/healthcare-hashtags/
  • Taylor, H.A., Kuwana, E., & Wilfond, B.S. (2014). Ethical implications of social media in health care research. American Journal of Bioethics, 14, 58–59.
  • Tumblr. (2014). Privacy policy. Retrieved 27 October 2014 from https://www.tumblr.com/policy/en/privacy
  • Twitter. (2014b). Twitter engineering blog – Introducing T witter data grants 05/02/2014. Retrieved 27 October 2014 from https://blog.twitter.com/2014/introducing-twitter-data-grants.
  • Twitter. (2014a). Privacy policy. Retrieved 27 October 2014 from https://twitter.com/privacy
  • Van Noorden, R. (2014). Scientists and the social network. Nature, 512, 126–129.
  • van Osch, W., & Coursaris, C.K. (2014). Social media research: An assessment of the domain's productivity and intellectual evolution. Communication Monographs, 81, 285–309.
  • Walker, D. (2014). The Internet as a medium for health services research. Part 2. Nurse Researcher, 20, 33–37.
  • Wang, C., Yang, J., Zhu, H., & Yu, L. (2014). Research on foreign tourists’ satisfaction with the 2010 Shanghai World Expo: Based on the blogs at a travel website. Journal of Convention and Event Tourism, 15, 114–134.
  • Weller, M. (2011). The Digital Scholar: How Technology is Transforming Scholarly Practice. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Young, P.J., Nickson, C.P., & Gantner, D. (2013). Can social media bridge the gap between research and practice? Critical Care and Resuscitation, 15, 257–259.
  • YouTube (2014). Terms and conditions. Retrieved 27 October 2014 from https://www.youtube.com/static?template = terms

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.