Walking during body-weight-supported treadmill training and acute responses to varying walking speed and body-weight support in ambulatory patients post-stroke

REFERENCES

• Aaslund MK, Helbostad JL, Moe-Nilssen R 2011 Familiarisation to body weight supported treadmill training for patients post-stroke. Gait and Posture 34: 467–472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaslund MK, Moe-Nilssen R 2008 Treadmill walking with body weight support: Effect of treadmill, harness and body weight support systems. Gait and Posture 28: 303–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ada L, Dean CM, Morris ME, Simpson JM, Katrak P 2010 Randomized trial of treadmill walking with body weight support to establish walking in subacute stroke. The MOBILISE Trial. Stroke 41: 1237–1242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alton F, Baldey L, Caplan S, Morrissey MC 1998 A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking. Clinical Biomechanics 13: 434–440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayat R, Barbeau H, Lamontagne A 2005 Speed and temporal-distance adaptations during treadmill and overground walking following stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 19: 115–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer B, Parvataneni K, Olney SJ 2009 A comparison of gait biomechanics and metabolic requirements of overground and treadmill walking in people with stroke. Clinical Biomechanics 24: 729–734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter A, Connor L, Dromerick A 2010 Rehabilitation after stroke: Current state of the science. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 10: 158–166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Patten C 2006 Treadmill training with harness support: Selection of parameters for individuals with poststroke hemiparesis. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 43: 485–498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Patten C, Kothari DH, Zajac FE 2005 Gait deviations associated with post-stroke hemiparesis: Improvement during treadmill walking using weight support, speed, support stiffness, and handrail hold. Gait and Posture 22: 57–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean CM, Ada L, Bampton J, Morris ME, Katrak PH, Potts S 2010 Treadmill walking with body weight support in subacute non-ambulatory stroke improves walking capacity more than overground walking: A randomised trial. Journal of Physiotherapy 56: 97–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobkin BH 2008 Training and exercise to drive poststroke recovery. Nature Clinical Practice Neurology 4: 76–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobkin BH, Duncan PW 2012 Should body weight–supported treadmill training and robotic-assistive steppers for locomotor training trot back to the starting gate? Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 26: 308–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dromerick AW, Lum PS, Hidler J 2006 Activity-based therapies. NeuroRx 3: 428–438
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duncan PW, Sullivan KJ, Behrman AL, Azen SP, Wu SS, Nadeau SE, Dobkin BH, Rose DK, Tilson JK, Cen S, Hayden SK 2011 Body-weight–supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke. New England Journal of Medicine 364: 2026–2036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, Choi JY, Glasberg JJ, Graham GD, Katz RC, Lamberty K, Reker D 2005 Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care: A clinical practice guideline. Stroke 36: e100–e143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eich HJ, Mach H, Werner C, Hesse S 2004 Aerobic treadmill plus Bobath walking training improves walking in subacute stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 18: 640–651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschini M, Carda S, Agosti M, Antenucci R, Malgrati D, Cisari C 2009 Walking after stroke: What does treadmill training with body weight support add to overground gait training in patients early after stroke? A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Stroke 40: 3079–3085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris-Love ML, Forrester LW, Macko RF, Silver KH, Smith GV 2001 Hemiparetic gait parameters in overground versus treadmill walking. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 15: 105–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris-Love ML, Macko RF, Whitall J, Forrester LW 2004 Improved hemiparetic muscle activation in treadmill versus overground walking. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 18: 154–160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassid E 1997 Improved gait symmetry in hemiparetic stroke patients induced during body weight-supported treadmill stepping. Journal of Neurologic Rehabilitation 11: 21
   Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Bertelt C, Jahnke MT, Schaffrin A, Baake P, Malezic M, Mauritz KH 1995 Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke 26: 976–981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Helm B, Krajnik J, Gregoric M, Mauritz KH 1997 Treadmill training with partial body weight support: Influence of body weight release on the gait of hemiparetic patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 11: 15–20
   Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Konrad M, Uhlenbrock D 1999 Treadmill walking with partial body weight support versus floor walking in hemiparetic subjects. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 80: 421–427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L 1984 Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired: Reliability and meaningfulness. Physical Therapy 64: 35–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsdottir J, Recalcati M, Rabuffetti M, Casiraghi A, Boccardi S, Ferrarin M 2009 Functional resources to increase gait speed in people with stroke: Strategies adopted compared to healthy controls. Gait and Posture 29: 355–359
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kautz SA, Bowden MG, Clark DJ, Neptune RR 2011 Comparison of motor control deficits during treadmill and overground walking poststroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 8: 756–765
   Google Scholar
• Kirtley C, Whittle MW, Jefferson RJ 1985 Influence of walking speed on gait parameters. Journal of Biomedical Engineering 7: 282–288
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kosak MC, Reding MJ 2000 Comparison of partial body weight-supported treadmill gait training versus aggressive bracing assisted walking post-stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 14: 13–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E 2004 Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: Facts and theories. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 22: 281–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham NK, Jette DU, Slavin M, Richards LG, Procino A, Smout RJ, Horn SD 2005 Physical therapy during stroke rehabilitation for people with different walking abilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 86: S41–S50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majsak MJ 1996 Application of motor learning principles to the stroke population. Topics of Stroke Rehabilitation 3: 27–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manning CD, Pomeroy VM 2003 Effectiveness of treadmill retraining on gait of hemiparetic stroke patients: Systematic review of current evidence. Physiotherapy 89: 337–349
   Google Scholar
• Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ahmed S, Gordon C, Higgins J, Mcewen S, Salbach N 1999 Disablement following stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation 21: 258–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizuike C, Ohgi S, Morita S 2009 Analysis of stroke patient walking dynamics using a tri-axial accelerometer. Gait and Posture 30: 60–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe-Nilssen R 1998a A new method for evaluating motor control in gait under real-life environmental conditions. Part 1: The instrument. Clinical Biomechanics 13: 320–327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe-Nilssen R 1998b Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometry during standing and walking. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 79: 1377–1385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe-Nilssen R, Helbostad JL 2004 Estimation of gait cycle characteristics by trunk accelerometry. Journal of Biomechanics 37: 121–126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe-Nilssen R, Helbostad JL 2005 Interstride trunk acceleration variability but not step width variability can differentiate between fit and frail older adults. Gait and Posture 21: 164–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley AM, Stark A, Cameron ID, Pollock A 2004 Treadmill Training and Body Weight Support for Walking after Stroke (Cochrane review). Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
   Google Scholar
• Murray MP, Spurr GB, Sepic SB, Gardner GM, Mollinger LA 1985 Treadmill vs. floor walking: Kinematics, electromyogram, and heart rate. Journal of Applied Physiology 59: 87–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagasaki H, Itoh H, Hashizume K, Furuna T, Maruyama H, Kinugasa T 1996 Walking patterns and finger rhythm of older adults. Perception and Motor Skills 82: 435–447
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson L, Carlsson J, Danielsson A, Fugl-Meyer A, Hellstrom K, Kristensen L, Sjolund B, Sunnerhagen KS, Grimby G 2001 Walking training of patients with hemiparesis at an early stage after stroke: A comparison of walking training on a treadmill with body weight support and walking training on the ground. Clinical Rehabilitation 15: 515–527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olney SJ, Richards C 1996 Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part 1: Characteristics. Gait and Posture 4: 136–148
   Google Scholar
• Pohl M, Mehrholz J, Ritschel C, Ruckriem S 2002 Speed-dependent treadmill training in ambulatory hemiparetic stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Stroke 33: 553–558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puh U, Baer GD 2008 A comparison of treadmill walking and overground walking in independently ambulant stroke patients: A pilot study. Disability and Rehabilitation 31: 202–210
   Google Scholar
• Sekiya N, Nagasaki H 1998 Reproducibility of the walking patterns of normal young adults: Test-retest reliability of the walk ratio (step-length/step-rate). Gait and Posture 7: 225–227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekiya N, Nagasaki H, Ito H, Furuna T 1996 The invariant relationship between step length and step rate during free walking. Journal of Human Movement Studies 30: 241–257
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan KJ, Brown DA, Klassen T, Mulroy S, Ge T, Azen SP, Winstein CJ 2007 Effects of task-specific locomotor and strength training in adults who were ambulatory after stroke: Results of the STEPS randomized clinical trial. Physical Therapy 87: 1580–1602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki K, Yamada Y, Handa T, Imada G, Iwaya T, Nakamura R 1999 Relationship between stride length and walking rate in gait training for hemiparetic stroke patients. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 78: 147–152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Threlkeld AJ, Cooper LD, Monger BP, Craven AN, Haupt G 2003 Temporospatial and kinematic gait alterations during treadmill walking with body weight suspension. Gait and Posture 17: 235–245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrell CM, Roos MA, Rudolph KS, Reisman DS 2011 Influence of systematic increases in treadmill walking speed on gait kinematics after stroke. Physical Therapy 91: 392–403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visintin M, Barbeau H, Korner-Bitensky N, Mayo NE 1998 A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke 29: 1122–1128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wernig A, Müller S 2002 Laufband Therapy. The Manual. Spinal Cord Damage, Stroke, Brain Damage and MS, Orthopedic Disorders and others. Oslo, License Aku Med AS
   Google Scholar
• Yang YR, Chen IH, Liao KK, Huang CC, Wang RY 2010 Cortical reorganization induced by body weight-supported treadmill training in patients with hemiparesis of different stroke durations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 91: 513–518
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zaheer Z, Robinson T, Mistri AK 2011 Thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: An update. Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease 2: 119–131
   PubMedGoogle Scholar