Focus group insights assist trial design for stroke telerehabilitation: a qualitative study

References

• Aziz NA 2010 Long-term rehabilitation after stroke: Where do we go from here? Reviews in Clinical Gerontology 20: 239–245
   Google Scholar
• Brawley LR, Rejeski WJ, King AC 2003 Promoting physical activity for older adults: The challenges for changing behavior. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 25: 172–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright FA, Kayes NM, McCann CM, McPherson KM 2011 Understanding hope after stroke: A systematic review of the literature using concept analysis. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 18: 490–508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchholz SW, Wilbur J, Ingram D, Fogg L 2013 Physical activity text messaging interventions in adults: A systematic review. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing 10: 163–173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conci M, Pianesi F, Zancanaro M 2009 Useful, social and enjoyable: Mobile phone adoption by older people. In: M Conci, F Pianesi, M Zancanaro (eds) Human–computer interaction – Interact 2009, pp 63–76. Berlin, Springer Link
   Google Scholar
• Cross A, Schneider M 2010 A preliminary qualitative analysis of the impact of hope on stroke recovery in women. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 17: 484–495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis S, Gesler W, Smith G, Washburn S 2000 Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: Examples in the geography of health. Social Science and Medicine 50: 1001–1014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party 2008 National clinical guideline for stroke, 3rd edn. London, Royal College of Physicians
   Google Scholar
• Johansson T, Wild C 2011 Telerehabilitation in stroke care: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 17: 1–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong KH, Lee J 2014 Temporal recovery of activities of daily living in the first year after ischemic stroke: A prospective study of patients admitted to a rehabilitation unit. NeuroRehabilitation 35: 221–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai JC, Woo J, Hui E, Chan WM 2004 Telerehabilitation – A new model for community-based stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 10: 199–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhammer B, Lindmark B, Stanghelle JK 2007 Stroke patients and long-term training: Is it worthwhile? A randomized comparison of two different training strategies after rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation 21: 495–510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack WM, Dean SG, Siegert RJ, McPherson KM 2011 Navigating patient-centered goal setting in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: How clinicians control the process to meet perceived professional responsibilities. Patient Education and Counseling 85: 206–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddison R, Whittaker R, Stewart R, Kerr A, Jiang Y, Kira G, Carter KH, Pfaeffli L 2011 HEART: Heart exercise and remote technologies: A randomized controlled trial study protocol. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 11: 26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin BJ, Yip B, Hearty M, Marletta S, Hill R 2002 Outcome, functional recovery and unmet needs following acute stroke. Experience of patient follow up at 6 to 9 months in a newly established stroke service. Scottish Medical Journal 47: 136–137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney M 2013 Lost in translation? Some criticize remote interpretation services. Modern Healthcare 43: 12
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation 2010 Clinical guidelines for stroke management. Melbourne, Australia
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen 2012 Survey new U.S. smartphone growth by age and income. http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2012/survey-new-u-s-smartphone-growth-by-age-and-income.html
   Google Scholar
• Saywell N, Vandal AC, Brown P, Hanger HC, Hale L, Mudge S, Milosavljevic S, Feigin V, Taylor D 2012 Telerehabilitation to improve outcomes for people with stroke: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 13: 233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale JK, McCreadie C, Turner-Smith A, Tinker A 2002 Older people as partners in assistive technology research: The use of focus groups in the design process. Technology and Disability 14: 21–29
   Google Scholar
• Statistics New Zealand 2009 Household use of information and communication technology. www.stats.govt.nz
   Google Scholar
• Stegmayr B, Asplund K 1996 Exploring the declining case fatality in acute stroke. Population-based observations in the northern Sweden MONICA Project. Journal of Internal Medicine 240: 143–149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor D, Stretton CM 2004 The Otago Exercise Programme: An evidence-based approach to falls prevention for older adults living in the community. New Zealand Family Physician 31: 391–394
   Google Scholar
• Thomas D 2006 A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation 27: 237–246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias M, Cheung J, Carter K, Anderson C, Feigin VL 2007 Stroke surveillance: Population-based estimates and projections for New Zealand. Australian and New Zealand Journal Of Public Health 31: 520–525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viosca E, Martínez JL, Almagro PL, Gracia A, González C 2005 Proposal and validation of a new functional ambulation classification scale for clinical use. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 86: 1234–1238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker R, Dorey E, Bramley D, Bullen C, Denny S, Elley CR, Maddison R, McRobbie H, Parag V, Rodgers A, Salmon P 2011 A theory-based video messaging mobile phone intervention for smoking cessation: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13: e10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker R, Merry S, Stasiak K, McDowell H, Doherty I, Shepherd M, Dorey E, Parag V, Ameratunga S, Rodgers A 2012 MEMO – A mobile phone depression prevention intervention for adolescents: Development process and postprogram findings on acceptability from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 14: e13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles R, Ashburn A, Payne S, Murphy C 2004 Discharge from physiotherapy following stroke: The management of disappointment. Social Science and Medicine 59: 1263–1273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles R, Demain S, Robison J, Kileff J, Ellis-Hill C, McPherson K 2008 Exercise on prescription schemes for stroke patients post-discharge from physiotherapy. Disability and Rehabilitation 30: 1966–1975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar