How do design features influence consumer attention when looking for nutritional information on food labels? Results from an eye-tracking study on pan bread labels

References

• Ares G, Giménez A, Bruzzone F, Antúnez L, Sapolinski A, Vidal L, Maiche A. 2012. Attentional capture and understanding of nutrition labelling: a study based on response times. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 63:679–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beardsworth I, Bryman A, Keil T, Goode J, Haslam C, Lancashire E. 2002. Women, men and food: the significance of gender for nutritional attitudes and choices. Brit Food J. 104:470–491.
   Google Scholar
• Bialkova S, van Trijp HCM. 2010. What determines consumer attention to nutrition labels?. Food Qual Prefer. 21:1042–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialkova S, van Trijp HCM. 2011. An efficient methodology for assessing attention to and effect of nutrition information displayed front-of-pack. Food Qual Prefer. 22:592–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowburn G, Stockley L. 2005. Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 8:21–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchowski AT. 2007. Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• , European Parliament. 2011. Regulation (EU) No. 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011. Off J Eur Union L. 304:18–63.
   Google Scholar
• Feunekes GIJ, Gortemaker IA, Willems AA, Lion R, van den Kommer M. 2008. Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: testing effectiveness of different nutrition labelling formats front-of-pack in four European countries. Appetite. 50:57–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food Standards Agency. 2007. Front-of-pack traffic light signpost labelling, Technical guidance. Issue 2. [Online]. http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/frontofpackguidance2.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg JH, Probart CK, Zak RE. 1999. Visual search of food nutrition labels. Hum Factors. 41:425–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham DJ, Jeffery RW. 2011. Location, location, location: eye tracking evidence that consumers preferentially view prominently positioned nutrition information. J Am Diet Assoc. 111:1704–1711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham DJ, Orquin JL, Visschers VHM. 2012. Eye tracking and nutrition label use: a review of the literature and recommendations for label enhancement. Food Policy. 37:378–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes CA, Riddell LJ, Nowson CA. 2009. Consumer knowledge and attitudes to salt intake and labelled salt information. Appetite. 53:189–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunert KG, Wills JM. 2007. A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels. J Public Health. 15:385–399.
   Google Scholar
• Grunert KG, Wills JM, Fernández-Celemín L. 2010. Nutrition knowledge, and use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels among consumers in the UK. Appetite. 55:177–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist K, Nyström M, Andersson R, van de Weijer J. 2011. Eye-tracking. A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horstmann N, Ahlgrimm A, Glöckner A. 2009. How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes. Judgm Decis Mak. 4 5: 335–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janiszewski C. 1998. The influence of display characteristics on visual exploratory search behavior. J Consum Res. 25:290–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones G, Richardson M. 2007. An objective examination of consumer perception of nutrition information based on healthiness ratings and eye movements. Public Health Nutr. 10:238–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackison D, Wrieden WL, Anderson AS. 2010. Validity and reliability testing of a short questionnaire to assess consumers' use, understanding and perception of food labels. Eur J Clin Nutr. 64:210–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milosavljevic M, Cerf M. 2008. First attention then intention. Insights from computational neuroscience of vision. Int J Advert. 27:381–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Salud Pública. 2006. Decreto 117/06. Montevideo. Uruguay: Ministerio de Salud Pública.
   Google Scholar
• Pieters R, Wedel M. 2004. Attention capture and transfer in advertising. Brand, pictorial, and text-size effects. J Market. 68:36–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radach R, Lemmer S, Vorstius C, Heller D, Radach K. 2003. Eye movements in the processing of print advertisements. In: Hyöna J, Radach R, Deubel H. editors. The mind's eye: cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research. Oxford: Elsevier Science609–623.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti G, Riggio L, Sheliga BM. 1994. Space and selective attention. In: Umiltà C, Moscovitch M. editors. Attention and performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press231–265.
   Google Scholar
• Roininen K, Lähteenmäki L, Tuorila H. 1999. Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods. Appetite. 33:71–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo JE. 1978. Eye fixations can save the world: a critical evaluation and a comparison between eye fixations and other information processing methodologies. In: Hunt HK. editors. Advances in consumer research. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research561–570.
   Google Scholar
• Roberto CA, Shivaram M, Martinez O, Boles C, Harris JL, Brownell KD. 2012. The Smart Choices front-of-package nutrition label. Influence on perceptions and intake of cereal. Appetite. 58:651–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharf M, Sela R, Zentner G, Shoob H, Shai I, Stein-Zamir C. 2012. Figuring out food labels. Young adults' understanding of nutritional information presented on food labels is inadequate. Appetite. 58:531–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Herpen E, Seiss E, van Trijp HCM. 2012. The role of familiarity in front-of-pack label evaluation and use: a comparison between the United Kingdom and The Netherlands. Food Qual Prefer. 26:22–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Herpen E, van Trijp HCM. 2011. Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints. Appetite. 57:148–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Trijp JCM. 2009. Consumer understanding and nutritional communication: key issues in the context of the new EU legislation. Eur J Nutr. 48 Suppl. 1: S41–S48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedel M, Pieters R. 2006. Eye tracking for visual marketing. Found. Trends Market. 1:231–320.
   Google Scholar
• Wedel M, Pieters R. 2007. A review of eye-tracking research in marketing. J Market Res. 4:123–147.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe JM. 1998. Visual search. In: Pashler H. editors. Attention. East Sussex: Psychology Press13–74.
   Google Scholar
• Yang GZ, Dempere-Marco L, Hu XP, Rowe A. 2002. Visual search: psychophysical models and practical applications. Image Vision Comput. 20:291–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar