Spanish adaptation of the Revised Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAq-II)

References

• Alexander LB, Luborsky L. (1986). The Penn Helping Alliance Scales. In: Greenberg LS, Pinsof WM, eds. The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 325–66
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2002). Manual diagnóstico y estadístico de los trastornos mentales [Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders] (4th ed., text rev.). Barcelona, Spain: Masson
   Google Scholar
• Andrade-González N. (2009). El papel del terapeuta en la alianza terapéutica [The role of the therapist in the therapeutic alliance]. Paper presented at UNED, Guadalajara: Spain
   Google Scholar
• Andrade-González N, Fernández-Liria A. (2015). Spanish adaptation of the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI): Psychometric properties of the patient and therapist forms (WAI-P and WAI-T). Anales de Psicología, 31, 524–533
   Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Rush AJ, Shaw BF, Emery G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York, NY: Guilford Press
   Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Steer RA. (1993). Beck Depression Inventory: Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation
   Google Scholar
• Bordin ES. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychother Theor Res Pract, 16, 252–60
   Google Scholar
• Conn H, Medrano LA, Moretti L. (2013). Adaptación del cuestionario de alianza de ayuda revisado versión paciente (HAq-II-P) para la población de cordobeses [Adaptation of the Revised Helping Alliance Questionnaire patient version (HAq-II-P) for the population of cordobans]. Terapia Psicológica, 31, 165–74
   Google Scholar
• Crits-Christoph P, Gallop R, Temes CM, et al. (2009). The alliance in motivational enhancement therapy and counseling as usual for substance use problems. J Consult Clin Psychol, 77, 1125–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaston L. (1991). Reliability and criterion-related validity of the California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales-Patient version. Psychol Assess, 3, 68–74
   Google Scholar
• Gaston L, Marmar CR. (1994). The California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales. In: Horvath AO, Greenberg LS, eds. The working alliance: Theory, research and practice. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 85–108
   Google Scholar
• Hersoug AG, Høglend P, Havik O, et al. (2009). Therapist characteristics influencing the quality of alliance in long-term psychotherapy. Clin Psychol Psychother, 16, 100–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath AO. (1981). An exploratory study of the working alliance: Its measurement and relationship to therapy outcome [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia
   Google Scholar
• Horvath AO, Del Re AC, Flückiger C, Symonds D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. In: Norcross JC, ed. Psychotherapy relationships that work: Evidence-based responsiveness. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 25–69
   Google Scholar
• Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. (1986). The development of the Working Alliance Inventory. In: Greenberg LS, Pinsof WM, eds. The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 529–56
   Google Scholar
• Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. J Couns Psychol, 36, 223–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luborsky L. (1976). Helping alliances in psychotherapy: The groundwork for a study of their relationship to its outcome. In: Claghorn JL, ed. Successful psychotherapy. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel, 92–116
   Google Scholar
• Luborsky L. (1994). Therapeutic alliances as predictors of psychotherapy outcomes: Factors explaining the predictive success. In: Horvath AO, Greenberg LS, eds. The working alliance: Theory, research and practice. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 38–50
   Google Scholar
• Luborsky L, Barber JP, Siqueland L, et al. (1996). The Revised Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAq-II): Psychometric properties. J Psychother Pract Res, 5, 260–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muñiz J. (2005). Utilización de los tests [Use of tests]. In: Muñiz J, Fidalgo AM, García-Cueto E, et al., eds. Análisis de los ítems [Item analysis]. Madrid, Spain: La Muralla, 133–72
   Google Scholar
• Petry NM, Alessi SM, Ledgerwood DM, Sierra S. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Contingency Management Competence Scale. Drug Alcohol Depen, 109, 167–74
   Google Scholar
• Ruglass LM, Miele GM, Hien DA, et al. (2012). Helping alliance, retention, and treatment outcomes: A secondary analysis from the NIDA clinical trials network women and trauma study. Subst Use Misuse, 47, 695–707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz J, Vázquez C. (1998). Fiabilidad, validez y datos normativos del Inventario para la Depresión de Beck [Reliability, validity, and normative data of the Beck Depression Inventory]. Psicothema, 10, 303–18
   Google Scholar
• Tryon GS, Blackwell SC, Hammel EF. (2008). The magnitude of client and therapist working alliance ratings. Psychotherapy, 45, 546–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez C, Sanz J. (1997). Fiabilidad y valores normativos de la versión española del Inventario para la Depresión de Beck de 1978 [Reliability and normative data of the Spanish version of 1978 Beck's Depression Inventory]. Clínica y Salud, 8, 403–22
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez C, Sanz J. (1999). Fiabilidad y validez de la versión española del Inventario para la Depresión de Beck de 1978 en pacientes con trastornos psicológicos [Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of Beck’s Depression Inventory (1978) in patients with psychological disorders]. Clínica y Salud, 10, 59–81
   Google Scholar