The impact of bilateral therapy on upper limb function after chronic stroke: a systematic review

References

• American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2009 Update Dallas, TX: American Heart Association; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Truelsen T, Piechowski-Jóźwiak B, Bonita R, Mathers C, Bogousslavsky J, Boysen G. Stroke incidence and prevalence in Europe: a review of available data. Eur J Neurol 2006;13:581–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation, Australia. Internet. 2009. Electronic Citation. http://www.strokefoundation.com.au/facts-figures-and-stats. Last accessed March 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Tobias M, Cheung J, Carter K, Anderson C, Feigin VL. Stroke surveillance: population-based estimates and projections for New Zealand. Aust NZ J Publ Health 2007;31:520–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitall J, Waller SM, Silver KHC, Macko RF. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 2000;31:2390–2395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Peppen RPS, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJM, Ver Der Wees PHJ, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clin Rehabil 2004;18:833–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberts JL, Butler AJ, Wolf SL. The effects of constraint-induced therapy on precision grip: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2004;18:250–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenstein L, Ridgel AL, Thota A, Sarnarne B, Alberts JL. Effects of combined robotic therapy and repetitive-task practice on upper-extremity function in a patient with chronic stroke. Am J Occup Ther 2008;62:28–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudie MH, Matyas TA. Can simultaneous bilateral movement involve the undamaged hemisphere in reconstruction of neural networks damaged by stroke? Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22:23–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suputtitada A, Suwanwela NC, Tumvitee S. Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. J Med Assoc Thai 2004;87:1482–1490.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taub E, Crago JE, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol 1998;43:152–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince LP, editor. Behavioural psychology in rehabilitation medicine: clinical application. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, Guiliani C, Light KE, Nichols-Larsen D. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke. J Am Med Assoc 2006; 296:2095–2104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine P, Page SJ. Modified constraint-induced therapy: a promising restorative outpatient therapy. Top Stroke Rehabil 2004;11(4): 1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richards LG, Senesac CR, Davis SB, Woodbury ML, Nadeau SE. Bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing in chronic stroke: not always efficacious. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:180–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart KC, Cauraugh JH, Summers JJ. Bilateral movement training and stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 2006;244:89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudie MH, Matyas TA. Upper extremity retraining following stroke: effects of bilateral practice. J Neurol Rehabil 1996;10:167–184.
   Google Scholar
• McCombe Waller S, Harris-Love M, Liu W, Whitall J. Temporal coordination of the arms during bilateral simultaneous and sequential movements in patients with chronic hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res 2006;168:450–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauraugh JH, Summers JJ. Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: a rehabilitation approach for chronic stroke. Prog Neurobiol 2005;75:309–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombe Waller S, Whitall J. Bilateral arm training: why and who benefits? NeuroRehabilitation 2008;23:29–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham CL, Phillips Stoykov ME, Walter CB. Bilateral facilitation of motor control in chronic hemiplegia. Acta Psychol 2002;110:321–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JJ, Tung WL, Wu WL, Huang MH, Su FC. Effects of robot-aided bilateral force-induced isokinetic arm training combined with conventional rehabilitation on arm motor function in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:1332–1338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinear CM, Barber A, Coxon JP, Fleming MK, Byblow WD. Priming the motor system enhances the effects of upper limb therapy in chronic stroke. Brain 2008;131:1381–1390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers JJ, Kagerer FA, Garry MI, Hiraga CY, Loftus A, Cauraugh JH. Bilateral and unilateral movement training on upper limb function in chronic stroke patients: a TMS study. J Neurol Sci 2007;252:76–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose DK, Winstein CJ. Bimanual training after stroke: are two hands better than one? Top Stroke Rehabil 2004;11:20–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:111–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prange GB, Jannink MJA, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, Hermens HJ, Ijzerman MJ. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006;43:171–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75:394–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Twisk J. Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke 2006;37:2348–2353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT, Langton Hewer R, Wood VA. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983;46:521–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantano P, Formisano R, Ricci M, Di Piero V, Sabatini U, Di Pofi B, Rossi R, Bozzao L, Lenzi GL. Motor recovery after stroke: morphological and functional brain alterations. Brain 1996;119:1849–1857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, Chen C, Tsai W, Lin K, Chou S. A randomised controlled trial of modified constraint-induced movement therapy for elderly stroke survivors: changes in motor impairment, daily functioning, and quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:273–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of ran domised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1998;52:377–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luft AR, McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J, Forrester LW, Macko R, Sorkin JD, Schulz JB, Goldberg AP, Hanley DF. Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 2004;292:1853–1861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M, Bardeleben A, Werner C. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:915–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombe Waller S, Whitall J. Fine motor control in adults with and without chronic hemiparesis: baseline comparison to nondisabled adults and effects of bilateral arm training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1076–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombe Waller S, Whitall J. Hand dominance and side of stroke affect rehabilitation in chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil 2005;19:544–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards LG, Senesac CR, Davis SB, Woodbury ML, Nadeau SE. Bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing in chronic stroke: not always efficacious. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:180–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 1986;89(2 Suppl):2–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002;16:232–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deakin A, Hill H, Pomeroy VM. Rough guide to the Fugl-Meyer assessment: upper limb section. Physiotherapy 2003; 89:751–763.
   Google Scholar
• Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford PW, Mayo NE. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures. 2nd ed Canada: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Lin K, Hsieh Y, Wu C, Chen C, Jang Y, Liu J. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the wolf motor function test in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009;23:429–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Therapy impact on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation. A critical review of the literature. Physiotherapy 1999;85:377–391.
   Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Stewart JC. Conditions of task practice for individuals with neurological impairments. In: Selzer M, Clarke S, Cohen LC, Duncan P, Gage F. editors. Textbook of neural repair and rehabilitation. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. pp 89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. 3rd ed Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007. pp 27–45.
   Google Scholar