The social interaction of return to work explored from co-workers experiences

References

• Baril R, Clarke J, Friesen M, Stock S, Cole D. Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: a qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:2101–2114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakin JM, MacEachen E. Health and social relations of work: a study of health-related experiences of employees in small workplaces. Sociol Health Illn 1998;20:896–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gates L. Workplace accommodation as a social process. JOccup Rehabil 2000;10:85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysaght RM, Larmour-Trode S. An exploration of social support as a factor in the return-to-work process. Work 2008;30:255–266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loisel P, Durand M, Berthelette D, Vezina N, Baril R, Gagnon D, Larivière C, Tremblay C. Disability prevention: new paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 2001;9:351–360.
   Google Scholar
• Tjulin A, Maceachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring workplace actors experiences of the social organization of return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil 2010;20:311–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw WS, Robertson MM, Pransky G, McLellan RK. Employee perspectives on the role of supervisors to prevent workplace disability after injuries. J Occup Rehabil 2003;13: 129–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren K, Dahlin Ivanoff S. Supervisors' views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study. J Occup Rehabil 2007;17:93–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren K, Dahlin Ivanoff S. Women on sickness absence – views of possibilities and obstacles for returning to work. Afocus group study. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:213–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz IZ, Stowell AW, Feuerstein M, Gatchel RJ. Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil 2007;17:327–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell G, Burton AK. Concepts of rehabilitation for the management of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2005;19:655–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, van Poppel MN, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15:557–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons JA, Eakin JM, Bell RS, Franche RL, Davis AM. ‘So, are you back to work yet?’ Re-conceptualizing ‘work’ and ‘return to work’ in the context of primary bone cancer. Soc Sci Med 2008;67:1826–1836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baril R, Clarke J, Friesen M, Stock S, Cole D. Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: a qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:2101–2114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen MN, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return-to-work: the importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work 2001;17:11–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eakin JM, MacEachen, E., Clarke J. ‘Playing it smart’ with return-to-work: small workplace experience under Ontario's policy of self-reliance and early return. Policy Pract Health Saf 2003;1:19–42.
   Google Scholar
• Elfering A, Semmer NK, Schade V, Grund S, Boos N. Supportive colleague, unsupportive supervisor: the role of provider-specific constellations of social support at work in the development of low back pain. J Occup Health Psychol 2002;7:130–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tjulin A, Maceachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring the meaning of early contact in return-to-work from workplace actors' perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:137–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fambrough MJ, Comerford SA. The changing epistemological assumptions of group theory. J Appl Behav Sci 2006;42: 330–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proposition. En reformerad sjukskrivningsprocess för ökad återgång i arbete. Stockholm: Socialdepartementet. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers Sweden – will the recent reforms make it? Paris: OECD; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen LP, Kines P, Hasle P. Owner attitudes and self reported behavior towards modified work after occupational injury absence in small enterprises: a qualitative study. JOccup Rehabil 2007;17:107–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. JAdv Nurs 2008;62:107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montin S. Moderna kommuner. MalmöLiber2002.
   Google Scholar
• Premfors R, Ehn P, Haldén E, Sundström G. Demokrati & byråkrati. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• SKL. Om kommuner. Sveriges kommuner och landsting. Internet. 2010. Electronic Citation. http://www.skl.se/web/Om__kommuner.aspx. Last accessed 19 April 2010
   Google Scholar
• Hogan B, Antonio Carrasco J, Wellman B. Visualizing personal networks: working with participant-aided sociograms. Field Methods 2007;19:116–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava P, Hopwood N. A practical iterative framework forqualitative data analysis. Int J Qual Methods 2009;8: 76–84.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche RL, Irvin E. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health 2006;32:257–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SOU. Gränslandet mellan sjukdom och arbete. Arbetförmåga/Medicinska förutsättningar/Försörjningsförmåga. Stockholm: SOU; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Iseskog T. Arbetsgivarens rehabiliteringsansvar. Mölnlycke: Nordstedts juridik; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachen E, Polzer J, Clarke J. ‘You are free to set your ownhours’: governing worker productivity and health throughflexibility and resilience. Soc Sci Med 2008;66: 1019–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjulin A, Edvardsson Stiwne E, Ekberg K. Experience of the implementation of a multi-stakeholder return-to-work programme. J Occup Rehabil 2009;19:409–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oostrom SH, Driessen MT, de Vet HCW, Franche RL, Schonstein E, Loisel P, van Mechelen W, Anema JR. Workplace interventions for preventing work disability (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(2):CD006955.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Briand C, Durand MJ, St-Arnaud L, Corbiere M. How well do return-to-work interventions for musculoskeletal conditions address the multicausality of work disability? J Occup Rehabil 2008;18:207–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anema JR, Schellart AJ, Cassidy JD, Loisel P, Veerman TJ, van der Beek AJ. Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil 2009;19:419–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15:607–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aas RW, Ellingsen KL, Lindoe P, Moller A. Leadership qualities in the return to work process: a content analysis. JOccup Rehabil 2008;8:335–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrey DE. Worksite disability management model for effectivereturn-to-work planning. Occup Med 2000;15:789–801, v.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nordqvist C, Holmqvist C, Alexanderson K. Views of laypersons on the role employers play in return to work when sick-listed. J Occup Rehabil 2003;13:11–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar