Negotiating the coresearcher mandate – service users’ experiences of doing collaborative research on mental health

References

• Wallcraft J, Schrank B, Amering M. Preface, in handbook of service user involvement in mental health research. Wallcraft J, Schrank B, Amering M, editors. London: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson L, Shaw J, Welborn S, Mahon B, Sirota M, Gilbo P, McDermid M et al. “I don’t know how to find my way in the worldâ: contributions of user-led research to transforming mental health practice. Psychiatry 2010;73:101–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson G, Ochocka J, Griffin K, Lord J. “Nothing about me, without meâ: participatory action research with self-help/mutual aid organizations for psychiatric consumer/survivors. Am J Community Psychol 1998;26:881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg M, Kristiansen K. Recovery-oriented professionals: helping relationships in mental health services. J Ment Health 2004;13:493–505.
   Google Scholar
• Ramon S., Healy, B, Renouf N. Recovery from mental illness as an emergent concept and practice in Australia and the UK. Int J Soc Psych 2007;53:108–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivedi P, Wykes T. From passive subjects to equal partners: qualitative review of user involvement in research. Br J Psychiatry 2002;181:468–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey M.. Should I stay or should I go? Practical, ethical and political challenges to ‘service user’ participation within social work research Qual Soc Work 2011;10:224–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner A, ThomasP. User-led research and evidence-based medicine. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veseth M, Binder PE, Borg M, Davidson L. Toward caring for oneself in a life of intense ups and downs: a reflexive-collaborative exploration of recovery in bipolar disorder. Qual Health Res 2012;22:119–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moltu C, Stefansen J, Svisdahl M, & Veseth M.. How to enhance the quality of research into mental health issues: Service users’ experiences of their potential contributions through collaborative methods In press. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl E. Phenomenological psychology. The Hauge: Martinus Nijhoff; 1900/1977.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger M. Being and time. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 1927/1978.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer HG. Truth and method. London: Continuum; 1960/1975.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Theory, method and research. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Laverty SM. Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: a comparison of historical and methodological considerations. Int J Qual Methods 2003;2:21–35.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001;358:483–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson M., Sköldberg, K. Reflexive methodology. New vistas for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JA, Osborn M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis, in qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. Smith JA, editor. London: Sage; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay L, Gough B, editors. Reflexivity. a practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay L, Evans K, editors. Relational-centered research for psychotherapists. Exploring meaning and experience. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay L. “Outingâ the researcher: the provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qual Health Res 2002;12:531–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay L. Through the looking glass: intersubjectivity and hermeneutic reflection. In: Finlay L, Gough B, editors. Reflexivity: a practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J, Barbour RS. Introduction: the challenge and promise of focus groups. In: Barbour RS, Kitzinger J, editors. Developing focus group research: politics, theory and practice. London: Sage; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups. a practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour RS. Doing focus groups. The sage qualitative research kit. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Kvalitative metoder i medisinsk forskning. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Shared understanding of the qualitative research process. Guidelines for the medical researcher. Fam Pract 1993;10:201–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill CE, Knox S, Thompson BJ, Williams EN, Hess SA, Ladany Consensual qualitative research: an update. J Couns Psychol, 2005;52:196–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose D. Collaborative research between users and professionals: peaks and pitfalls. Psychiatri Bull 2003;27:404–406.
   Google Scholar