Your ideas about participation and environment: a new self-report instrument

References

• MacDonald C. Self-assessment models, practice and tools within disability support services. New Zealand: Ministry of Health; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths P, Harris R, Ullman R. Self assessment of health and social care needs by older people: a multi-method systematic review of practices, accuracy, effectiveness and experience. London: National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO); 2005
   Google Scholar
• Frost M, Reeve B, Liepa A, et al. What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient reported outcome measures? Value Health 2007;10:S94–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn EA, Cella D, Chassany O, et al. Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. Precision of health-related quality-of-life data compared with other clinical measures. Mayo Clin Proc 2007;82:1244–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jylhä M. What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Soc Sci Med 2009;69:307–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magasi S, Post M. A comparative review of contemporary participation measures’ psychometric properties and content coverage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S17–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICF: International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Wade D, Halligan P. New wine in old bottles: the WHO ICF as an explanatory model of human behaviour. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:349–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Plow M. Measuring participation as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: an evaluation of existing measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:856–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post M. Measuring the subjective appraisal of participation with life satisfaction measures: bridging the gap between participation and quality of life measurement. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2010;15:1–15
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann A. Measurement of participation in rehabilitation research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S1–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Dijkers M. Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:S22–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M, Dijkers M, Gordon W, et al. Participation objective, participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004;19:459–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noonan V, Kopec J, Noreau L, et al. Comparing the content of participation instruments using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009;7:93 . doi:10.1186/1477-7525-7-93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. A functioning and related health outcomes module: the development of a data capture tool for health and community services information systems. AIHW cat. no. WP53. Canberra: AIHW; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Gray D, Hollingsworth H, Stark S, Morgan K. Participation survey/mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:189–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noreau L, Boschen K. Intersection of participation and environmental factors: a complex interactive process. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S44–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Community Services Data Committee. National community services data dictionary: version five. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). ICF Australian user guide. Version 1.0. Disability series. AIHW Cat. No. DIS 33. Canberra: AIHW; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Brod M, Tesler L, Christensen T. Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience. Qual Life Res 2009;18:1263–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. London: SAGE; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1445–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black N, Jenkinson C. Measuring patients’ experiences and outcomes. Br Med J 2009;339:202--5
   Google Scholar
• Epstein R, Fiscella K, Lesser C, Stange K. Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:1489–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, et al. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ 2001;323:908–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao J, Anderson L, Inui T, Frankel R. Communication interventions make a difference in conversations between physicians and patients: a systematic review of the evidence. Med Care 2007;45:340–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart M, Brown J, Donner A, et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract 2000;49:796–804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach E, Cornwell P, Fleming J, Haines T. Patient centered goal-setting in a subacute rehabilitation setting. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:159–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Challis D, Clarkson P, Hughes J, et al. Enhancing the efficiency of effectiveness of assessment in community care. Vol. IV. Self assessment pilot projects: concluding observations. Manchester, UK: Personal Social Services Research Unit, PSSRU, University of Manchester; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Glendinning C, Challis D, Fernández JL, et al. Evaluation of the individual budgets pilot programme final report. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York; 2008
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. Geneva: ICF; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Lewis J, eds. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2003
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, The World Bank. World report on disability. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011
   Google Scholar