“Look and feel your best”: representations of artificial limb users in prosthetic company advertisements

References

• Murray CD, Forshaw MJ. The experience of amputation and prosthesis use for adults: a metasynthesis. Disab Rehab, in press
   Google Scholar
• National Amputee Statistical Database (NASDAB). The amputee statistical database for the United Kingdom 2006/07. Edinburgh: Information Services Division NHS Scotland; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Burgess EM, Rappoport A. Physical fitness: a guide for individuals with lower limb loss. Baltimore (MD): Department of Veteran Affairs; 1993
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Adjustment to an artificial limb: a qualitative perspective. J Health Psychol 2001;6:85–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson GM, Schulz R, Bridges MW, Behan AM. Social and psychological factors in adjustment to limb amputation. J Soc Behav Pers 1994;9:249–68
   Google Scholar
• Cutson TM, Bongiorni DR. Rehabilitation of the older lower limb amputee: a brief review. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996;44:1388–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French L. The political economy of injury and compassion: amputees on the Thai-Cambodia border. In: Csordas TJ, ed. Embodiment and experience: the existential ground of culture and self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994:69–99
   Google Scholar
• Lyons AC. Examining media representations: benefits for health psychology. J Health Psychol 2000;5:349–58
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox NJ, Ward KJ, O’Rourke AJ. The ‘expert patient’: empowerment or medical dominance? The case of weight loss, pharmaceutical drugs and the Internet. Soc Sci Med 2005;60:1299–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herschbach L. Prosthetic reconstructions: making the industry, re-making the body, modelling the nation. Hist Workshop J 1997;44:23–57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ott K. The sum of its parts: an introduction to modern histories of prosthetics. In: Ott K, Serlin D, Mihm S, eds. Artificial parts, practical lives: modern histories of prosthetics. New York: New York University Press; 2002:1–44
   Google Scholar
• Serlin D. Engineering masculinity: veterans and prosthetics after World War Two. In: Ott K, Serlin D, Mihm S, eds. Artificial parts, practical lives: modern histories of prosthetics. New York: New York University Press; 2002:45–74
   Google Scholar
• Kurzman SL. Cultural attitudes towards prostheses: an anthropological approach. Capabilities: Commun Sci Prosthet Orthot 1997;6:3–5, 8
   Google Scholar
• Murray CD. Embodiment and prosthetics. In: Gallagher P, Desmond D, MacLachlan M, eds. Psychoprosthetics: state of the knowledge. New York: Springer; 2008:119–30
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–81
   Google Scholar
• Potter J, Wetherell M. Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage; 1987
   Google Scholar
• Barthes R. Mythologies. New York: The Noonday Press; 1993
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell M, Potter J. Mapping the language of racism: discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester-Wheatsheaf; 1992
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik M, Sen A. Semiotics and qualitative research. J Market Res Soc 1990;32:227–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter J. Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In: Camic, PM, Rhodes JE, Yardley L, eds. Qualitative research in psychology: expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2003:73–94
   Google Scholar
• Lyons AC, Willott S. From suet pudding to superhero: representations of men’s health for women. Health 1999;3:283–302
   Google Scholar
• Smirnova AV. Reported speech as an element of argumentative newspaper discourse. Discourse Commun 2009;3:79–103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley SCE. The management of the traditional male role: a discourse analysis of the constructions and functions of provision. J Gender Stud 2003;12:99–113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger H. Return to work after amputation. In: Murray C, ed. Amputation, prosthesis use, and phantom limb pain. New York: Springer; 2009:101–14
   Google Scholar
• Martens L. Gender and consumer behaviour. In: Parsons E, Maclaran P, eds. Contemporary issues in marketing and consumer behaviour. London: Elsevier; 2009:105–20
   Google Scholar
• Anderson ML. Thinking about women: sociological perspectives on sex and gender. New York: Macmillan; 1988
   Google Scholar
• Conradie M. Constructing femininity: a critical discourse analysis of Cosmo. South Afr Ling Appl Lang Stud 2011;29:401–17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough B. ‘Real men don’t diet’: an analysis of contemporary newspaper representations of men, food and health. Soc Sci Med 2007;64:326–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damean D. Media and gender: constructing feminine identities in a postmodern culture. J Study Relig Ideol 2006;5:89–94
   Google Scholar
• Haller BA. Representing disability in an ableist world: essays on mass media. Louisville (KY): The Avocado Press; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Murray CD. The social meanings of prosthesis use. J Health Psychol 2005;10:425–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CD. The personal meanings of prosthesis use. Disab Rehab 2009;31:573–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CD. An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the embodiment of artificial limbs. Disab Rehab 2004;26:963–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CD. ‘Don’t you talk to your prosthetist?’ Communicational problems in the prescription of artificial limbs. Disab Rehab 2013;35:513–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrigan M, Szmigin I. The representation of older people in advertisements. Int J Market Res 1999;41:311–26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar