Implementing the National Service Framework for long-term (neurological) conditions: service user and service provider experiences

References

• Hobbs J, Sixsmith J. Changing service for people with long-term neurological conditions: promoting well-being within service provision. Manchester: Research Institute for Health and Social Change; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. The national service framework for long-term conditions. London: Department of Health; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Services for people with neurological conditions. London: Department of Health; 2011
   Google Scholar
• The Neurological Alliance. Neuro Numbers: a brief overview of the numbers of people in the UK with a neurological condition. London: The Neurological Alliance; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians, National Council for Palliative Care, British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine. Long-term neurological conditions: management at the interface between neurology, rehabilitation and palliative care. Concise Guidance to Good Practice series, No 10. London, RCP; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians. Long-term neurological conditions: management at the interface between neurology, rehabilitation and palliative care. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2008
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald BK, Cockerell OC, Sander JWAS, Shorvon SD. The incidence and lifetime prevalence of neurological disorders in a prospective community-based study in the UK. Brain 2000;123:665–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L. Politics, policy and payment – facilitators or barriers to person-centred rehabilitation? Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1575–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grindley K, Aspinal F, Bernard S, Parker G. Services that promote continuity of care: key findings from an evaluation of the national service framework for long-term neurological conditions. Social Care Neurodisabil 2011;2:147–57
   Google Scholar
• Bernard S, Aspinal F, Gridley K, Parker G. (2010) Integrated services for people with long-term neurological conditions: evaluation of the impact of the national service framework, final report, SPRU working paper No. SDO 2399, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, New York. Available at http://php.york.ac.uk/inst/spru/research/summs/ltnc.php [last accessed 19 June 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T. Patient and public involvement in chronic illness: beyond the expert patient. BMJ 2009;338:b49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staley K. Impact: public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. London: NHS National Institute for Health Research; 2009
   Google Scholar
• NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. The engagement cycle: engaging with patients and the public throughout the commissioning process. London: NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Neurological Commissioning Support. Taking stock and moving forward: an audit of neurological services across Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly. London: Neurological Commissioning Support; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Neurological Commissioning Support. Halfway through- are we halfway there? A mid-term review of the National Service Framework for long term neurological conditions. London: Neurological Commissioning Support; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Gair S. Feeling their stories: contemplating empathy, insider/outsider positioning, and enriching qualitative research. Qual Health Res 2012;22:134–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley P. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London: SAGE Publications; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101
   Google Scholar
• Silverman D. Doing qualitative research. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Tobin GA, Begley CM. Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. J Adv Nurs 2004;48:388–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainwright D. Can sociological research be qualitative, critical and valid? Qual Rep 1997;3:2
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society. Code of conduct, ethical principles and guidelines [Internet]. Leicester: British Psychological Society. Available at www.scutrea.ac.uk/library/bpscode.pdf [last accessed 25 Mar 2007]
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt C. Doing a dissertation. In: Seale C, ed. Researching society and culture. 3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2012:P153–78
   Google Scholar
• Hanna NJ, Black, M, Sander JWS, et al. The national sentinel clinical audit of epilepsy-related death: epilepsy–death in the shadows. London: The Stationery Office; 2002
   Google Scholar
• van Donselaar CA, Stroink H, Arts WF. How confident are we of the diagnosis of epilepsy? Epilepsia 2006;47:9–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sixsmith J, Woolrych, R. Humanising dementia care: the case of care concepts. Manchester, RIHSC: Research Institute for Health and Social Change; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Gage H, Storey L. Rehabilitation for Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review of available evidence. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:463–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legg L, Langhorne P, Andersen HE, et al. Rehabilitation therapy services for stroke patients living at home: systematic review of randomised trials. Lancet 2004;363:352–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Sykes N, Suilber E, et al. From diagnosis to death: exploring the interface between neurology, rehabilitation and palliative care in managing people with long-term neurological conditions. Clin Med 2007;7:129–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young J. The evidence base for intermediate care. Geriatr Med 2002;32:11–14
   Google Scholar