Efficacy of leisure intervention groups in rehabilitation of people with an acquired brain injury

References

• Brown M, Wayne A, Gordon A, Spielman L. Participation in social and recreational activity in the community by individuals with traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Psychol 2003;48:266–74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J, Dyson M, Foreman P. Increasing leisure activity following severe traumatic brain injury: does it make a difference? Brain Impair 2006;2:107–18
   Google Scholar
• Dikman S, Machamer J, Powell J, Temkin N. Outcome 3 to 5 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;10:1449–57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton M, Wehman P. Psychosocial and emotional sequelae of individuals with traumatic brain injury: a literature review and recommendations. Brain Inj 1995;9:81–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaway L, Sloan S, Winkler D. Maintaining and developing friendships following severe traumatic brain injury: principles of occupational therapy practice. Aust Occup Ther J 2005;52:257–60
   Google Scholar
• Malley D, Cooper J, Cope J. Adapting leisure activity for adults with neuropsychological deficits following acquired brain injury. Neurorehabilitation 2008;23:329–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Strokes L. Rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: National Clinical Guidelines. British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine. London: Royal College of Physicians of London; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Daniel A, Manigandan C. Efficacy of leisure intervention groups and their impact on quality of life among people with spinal cord injuries. Int J Rehabil Res 2005;28:43–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonneau H, Martineau E, Andre M, Dawson D. Enhancing leisure experiences post traumatic brain injury: a pilot atudy. Brain Impair 2011;12:140–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise E, Mathews-Dalton C, Dikmen S, et al. Impact of traumatic brain injury on participation in leisure activities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:1357–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas M. The potential unlimited programme: an outdoor experiential education and group work approach that facilitates adjustment to brain injury. Brain Inj 2004;18:1271–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenech A, Shaw Fisher K. Lifelong and therapeutic recreation and leisure. In: Zasler N, Katz D, Zafonte R, eds. Brain injury medicine: principles and practice. 2nd ed. New York: Demos Medical Publishing; 2012:1360–72
   Google Scholar
• Prvu J, Navar N, Yaffe R, Hagar H. The effects of leisure education on leisure satisfaction, leisure participation and self-confidence for individuals with brain injury. Ninth Canadian Congress on Leisure Research; 1999 May 12–15; Wolfville (NS): Acadia University Printing Services; 1999
   Google Scholar
• Sander A, Clark A, Pappadis, M. What is community integration anyway?: defining meaning following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2010;25:1121–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck S. Meaningful relationships: talking sense and relating. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Youngkhill L, McCormick B, Austin D. Toward an engagement in social support: a key to community integration in rehabilitation. World Leisure 2001;2:25–30
   Google Scholar
• Blake B, Batson M. Exercise intervention in acquired brain injury rehabilitation: a discussion. Int J Ther Rehabil 2008;15:180–5
   Google Scholar
• Hassett L, Moseley A, Tate R, Harmer A. Fitness training for cardiovascular conditioning after traumatic brain injury. The Cochrane Library, July 2009. Available from: http://wwwonlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006123.pub2/full [last accessed 28 Nov 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Iwasaki Y, Zuzanek J, Mannell R. The effects of physically active leisure on stress-health relationships. Can J Public Health 2001;92:214–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming J, Braithwaite H, Gustafsson L, et al. Participation in leisure activities during brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Inj 2011;25:806–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan S, Winkler D, Callaway L. Community integration following severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes and best practice. Brain Imp 2004;5:12–29
   Google Scholar
• Brown M, Vandergoot D. Quality of life of individuals with traumatic brain injury: comparisons with others living in the community. J Head Trauma Rehab 1998;13:1–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenech A, Baker M. Casual leisure and the sensory diet: a concept for improving quality of life in neuropalliative conditions. NeuroRehabilitation 2008;23:369–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molineux M, Whiteford G. Prisons: from occupational deprivation to occupational enrichment. J Occ Sci 1999;6:124–30
   Google Scholar
• Miller Polgar J, Landry J. Occupations as a means for person and group participation in life. In: Christiansen CH, Townsend EA, eds. Introduction to occupation: the art and science of living. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2004:197--220
   Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being American. Psychologist 2000;55:68–78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stonier C. Tailoring leisure to suit a wider audience through creative event planning with a multi-sensory approach. Neurorehabilitation 2008;23:351–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenech A. Aquatic leisure satisfaction and engagement in neuropalliative disability management. Scand J Caring Sci 2012;26:519–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stebbins R. Right leisure: serious, casual, or project-based? Neurorehabilitation 2008;23:335–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer J, Clark M, Sherman A. Rural versus urban social support seeking as a moderating variable in traumatic brain injury outcome. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2003;18:116–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coetzer B, Hayes N, Toit PL. Long-term employment outcomes in a rural area following traumatic brain injury. Aust J Rural Health 2002;10:229–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bier N, Dutil E, Couture M. Factors affecting leisure participation after a traumatic brain injury: an exploratory study. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2009;24:187–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fines L, Nichols D. An evaluation of a twelve week recreational kayak program: effects on self-concept, leisure satisfaction and leisure attitude of adults with traumatic brain injuries. J Cognit Rehabil 1994;September/October:10–15
   Google Scholar
• Costilow A, Ellis G, Forsyth P, Witt P. Barriers to leisure opportunities. In: Witt P, Ellis G, Aguilar T, eds. The leisure diagnostic user’s guide. Denton: North Texas State University Press; 1982
   Google Scholar
• Parker C, Gladman J, Drummond A. The role of leisure in stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2001;19:1–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson C, Gunn S. Therapeutic recreation program design: principles and procedures. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1984
   Google Scholar
• Beard J, Ragheb M. The leisure satisfaction measure. J Leisure Res 1980;12:20–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysyk M, Brown T, Rodrigues E, et al. Translation of the leisure satisfaction scale into french: a validation study. Occup Ther Int 2002;9:76–89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organisation. WHOQOL-BREF introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment, Field trial version. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 1996
   Google Scholar
• Rosenburg M. Conceiving the self. Malabar (FL): Krieger; 1986
   Google Scholar
• The University of Reading. Instat Plus 2006. Statistical Services Centre, The University of Reading, United Kingdom
   Google Scholar
• Brain Injury Australia [Internet]. Available from: http://www.braininjuryaustralia.org.au [last accessed 27 Apr 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Kinney W, Coyle C. Predicting life satisfaction among adults with physical disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;79:395–402
   Google Scholar