An integrated methods study of the experiences of youth with severe disabilities in leisure activity settings: the importance of belonging, fun, and control and choice

References

• Kramer JM, Hammel J. “I Do Lots of Things”: children with cerebral palsy's competence for everyday activities. Int J Disabil Dev Educ 2011;58:121–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway S, Valentine G. Children's geographies: playing, living, learning. London: Routledge; 2000
   Google Scholar
• King G. Perspectives on measuring participation: going forward. Child Care Health Dev 2013;39:466–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessup GM, Cornell E, Bundy AC. The treasure in leisure activities: fostering resilience in young people who are blind. J Vis Impair Blind 2010;104:419–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart DA, Lawless JJ, Shimmell LJ, et al. Social participation of adolescents with cerebral palsy: trade-offs and choices. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2012;32:167–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding J, Harding K, Jamieson P, et al. Children with disabilities' perceptions of activity participation and environments: a pilot study. Can J Occup Ther 2009;76:133–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynes K, Galvin J, Howie L. Exploring the leisure experiences of young people with spinal cord injury or disease. Dev Neurorehabil 2012;15:361–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedvall PO, Rydeman B. An activity systemic approach to augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 2010;26:230–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnihotri S, Gray J, Colantonio A, et al. Two case study evaluations of an arts-based social skills intervention for adolescents with childhood brain disorder. Dev Neurorehabil 2012;15:284–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson BE, King G, Kushki A, et al. A multi-method approach to studying activity setting participation: integrating standardized questionnaires, qualitative methods, and physiological measures. Disabil Rehabil 2013 , in press
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Batorowicz B, Rigby P, et al. The leisure activity settings and experiences of youth with severe disabilities. Dev Neurorehabil 2013;Early Online:1–11
   Google Scholar
• King G, Batorowicz B, Rigby P, et al. Development of a measure to assess youth Self-reported Experiences of Activity Settings (SEAS). Int J Disabil Dev Educ, in press
   Google Scholar
• King G, Rigby P, Batorowicz B. Conceptualizing participation in context for children and youth with disabilities: an activity setting perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:1578–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewster S, Coleyshaw L. Participation or exclusion? Perspectives of pupils with autistic spectrum disorders on their participation in leisure activities. Br J Learn Disabil 2010. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2010.00665.x
   Google Scholar
• Kramer JM, Olsen S, Mermelstein M, et al. Youth with disabilities' perspectives of the environment and participation: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Child Care Health Dev 2012;38:763–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahey MJ, DiGiovanni N, Calhoun C, et al. Children's and parents' perspectives about activity performance and participation after spinal cord injury: initial development of a patient-reported outcome measure. Am J Occup Ther 2010;64:605–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer-Cavaliere N, Watkinson JE. Inclusion understood from the perspectives of children with disability. Adap Phys Act Q 2010;27:275–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell J, Plano Clark V, et al. Advanced mixed methods research designs. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2003:209–40
   Google Scholar
• Hanson WE, Creswell JW, Clark VLP, et al. Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol 2005;52:224–35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall B, Howard K. A synergistic approach: conducting mixed methods research with typological and systematic design considerations. J Mixed Methods Res 2008;2:248–69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Res Nurs Health 2000;23:246–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ 2010;341:1147–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran-Ellis J, Alexander VD, Cronin A, et al. Triangulation and integration: processes, claims and implications. Qual Res 2006;6:45–59
   Google Scholar
• Dures E, Rumsey N, Morris M, Gleeson K. Mixed methods in health psychology: theoretical and practical considerations of the third paradigm. J Health Psychol 2010;16:332–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene JC, Caracelli VJ. Making paradigmatic sense of mixed methods practice. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2003:91–110
   Google Scholar
• Crotty M. The foundations of social research: meaning and perspectives in the research process. St. Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Palisano RJ, Rosenbaum P, Bartlett D, Livingston M. Content validity of the expanded and revised Gross Motor Function Classification System. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008;50:744–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson AC, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Rosblad B, et al. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006;48:549–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teachman G, McMain-Klein M. Visual Consent Framework: doing research with people who communicate differently. 15th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC); 2012; Pittsburgh, PENN
   Google Scholar
• King G, Law M, King S, et al. Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment (CAPE) and Preferences for Activities of Children (PAC). San Antonio (TX): Harcourt Assessment; 2004
   Google Scholar
• King GA, Law M, King S, et al. Measuring children’s participation in recreation and leisure activities: construct validation of the CAPE and PAC. Child Care Health Dev 2006;33:28–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health 2010;33:77–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strack RW, Magill C, McDonagh K. Engaging youth through photovoice. Health Promot Pract 2004;5:49–58
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Croghan R, Griffin C, Hunter J, Phoenix A. Young people's constructions of self: notes on the use and analysis of the photo-elicitation methods. Int J Soc Res Meth 2008;11:345–56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdewic SP. Participant observation. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, eds. Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1999:47–69
   Google Scholar
• Ison NL. Having their say: email interviews for research data collection with people who have verbal communication impairment. Int J Soc Res Meth 2009;12:161–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan J, Chenoweth L, McAuliffe D. Email-facilitated qualitative interviews with traumatic brain injury survivors: a new and accessible method. Brain Injury 2006;20:1283–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer JM. Using mixed methods to establish the social validity of a self-report assessment: an illustration using the Child Occupational Self-Assessment (COSA). J Mixed Methods Res 2011;5:52–76
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles M, Huberman A. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded source book. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Wendler MC. Triangulation using a meta-matrix. J Adv Nurs 2001;35:521–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum; 1985
   Google Scholar
• Maslow AH. Motivation and personality. 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row; 1970
   Google Scholar
• King G, Petrenchik T, Law M, Hurley P. The enjoyment of formal and informal recreation and leisure activities: a comparison of school-aged children with and without physical disabilities. Int J Disabil Dev Educ 2009;56:109–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delle Fave A, Massimini F. The relevance of subjective well-being to social policies: optimal experience and tailored intervention. In: Huppert FA, Baylis N, Keverne B, eds. The science of well-being. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2005:379–402
   Google Scholar