Exploring staff experience of an “enriched environment” within stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative sub-study

References

• National Stroke Foundation. Facts and figures about stroke. 2012. Available from: http://strokefoundation.com.au/health-professionals/tools-and-resources/facts-and-figures-about-stroke/ [last accessed 24 Feb 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Australia’s Health 2006 (cat no. AUS 73). Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2006. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au [last accessed 12 Feb 2010]
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, et al. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke: a research synthesis. Stroke 1997;28:1550–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hankey G, Jamrozik K, Broadhurst R, Anderson C. Long-term disability after first ever stroke and related prognostic factors in the Perth community stroke study. Stroke 2002;33:1034--40
   Google Scholar
• Niemi M, Laaksonen R, Kotila M, Waltimo O. Quality of life 4 years after stroke. Stroke 1998;19:1101–7
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:823–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, an Peppen R, Wagenaar R, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2004;35:2529–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey F, Ada L, Heard R, Adams R. Stroke rehabilitation: are highly structured units more conducive to physical activity than less structured units? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1066–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen H, Ada L, Bernhardt J, et al. Physical, cognitive and social activity levels of stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation within a mixed rehabilitation unit. Clin Rehabil 2012. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1177/0269215512466252
   Google Scholar
• West T, Bernhardt J. Physical activity in hospitalised stroke patients. Stroke Res Treat 2012;2012:813765
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nithianantharajah J, Hannan A. Enriched environments, experience-dependent plasticity and disorders of the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006;7:697–709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen H, Bernhardt J, Collier JM, et al. An enriched environment improves sensorimotor function post-ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010;24:802–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ploeg J, Davies B, Edwards N, et al. Factors influencing best-practice guideline implementation: lessons learned from administrators, nursing staff, and project leaders. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs 2007;4:210–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust 2004;180:S57–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon A, Bitensky N, Straus S. Best practise use in stroke rehabilitation: from trials and tribulations to solutions! Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:646–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maich M. Transformative learning and research utilization in nursing practice: a missing link? Evid-Based Nurs 2010;7:25–35
   Google Scholar
• Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet 2003;362:1225–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Clinical Studies (NICS). Identifying barriers to evidence uptake. Melbourne (Australia): NICS; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Rochette A, Korner-Bitensky N, Thomas A. Changing clinicians' habits: is this the hidden challenge to increasing best practices? Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1790–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford S, Schofield T, Hope T. What are the ingredients for a successful evidence-based patient choice consultation? A qualitative study. Soc Sci Med 2003;56:589–602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKevitt C, Redfern J, Mold F, Wolfe C. Qualitative studies of stroke: a systematic review. Stroke 2004;35:1499–505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aujoulat I, d’Horre W, Deccache A. Patient empowerment in theory and practice: polysemy or cacophony? Patient Educ Couns 2007;66:13–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosewilliam S, Roskell CA, Pandyan AD. A systematic review and synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative evidence behind patient-centred goal setting in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2011;25:501–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mold F, McKevitt C, Wolfe C. A review and commentary of the social factors which influence stroke care: issues of inequality in qualitative literature. Health Soc Care Commun 2003;11:405–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. The concept of patient motivation: a qualitative analysis of stroke professionals' attitudes. Stroke 2002;33:444–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grbich C. Qualitative research design. In: Minichiello V, Sullivan G, Greenwood K, Axford R, eds. Handbook of research methods for nursing and health science. 2nd ed. Frenchs Forest (NSW): Pearson Education Australia; 2004:151–75
   Google Scholar
• Pope C, Mays N. Qualitative research: reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. Br Med J 1995;311:42--5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen H, Ada L, Karayanidis F, et al. Translating the use of an enriched environment post stroke from bench to bedside: study design and protocol used to test the feasibility of environmental enrichment on stroke patients in rehabilitation. Int J Storke 2012;7:521–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale S. Doing interviews. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualit Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J, Lynch M. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1990
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln Y, Guba E, eds. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage Publications, Inc.; 1985
   Google Scholar
• Bartley E, White J, Janssen H, et al. Exploring patient experience of stroke rehabilitation within an ‘enriched environment’: a qualitative sub-study [Honours thesis]; 2011
   Google Scholar
• King A, McCluskey A, Schurr K. The time use and activity levels of inpatients in a co-located acute and rehabilitation stroke unit: an observational study. Top Stroke Rehabil 2011;18:654–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen H, Ada L, Bernhardt J, et al. An enriched environment increases activity in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation in a mixed rehabilitation unit: a pilot non-randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2013. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.3109/09638288.2013.788218
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt J, Dewey H, Thrift A, Donnan G. Inactive and alone: physical activity within the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care. Stroke 2004;35:1005–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcock A. Sylvia Docker Lecture. Creating self and shaping the world. Austra Occupat Thera J 1999;46:77–88
   Google Scholar