Social participation post stroke: a meta-ethnographic review of the experiences and views of community-dwelling stroke survivors

References

• Burton C. Living with stroke: a phenomenological study. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:301–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann A. Putting outcome measurement in context: a rehabilitation psychology perspective. Rehabil Psychol 2005;50:6–14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. National Stroke Strategy. London: The Stationery Office; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Commissioning Support for London. Life after stroke: commissioning guide. A guide for commissioners in the NHS and local authorities to develop and improve their service to stroke survivors living in their communities. London; 2010
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and health ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Oliver M. Theories of disability in health practice and research. Br Med J 1998;317:1446–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cott C, Wiles R, Devitt R. Continuity, transition and participation: preparing clients for life in the community post stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1566–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and Health ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Dijkers M. Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:S22–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers M. Issues in the conceptualization and measurement of participation: an overview. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S5–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai J, Teasell R, et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:507–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette A, Haley S, Kooyoomjian J. Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct? J Rehabil Med 2003;35:145–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay-Goddard R, Ripat J, Mayo N. Developing a model of participation post stroke: a mixed–methods approach. Qual Life Res 2012;21:417–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggstrom A, Larsson M. The complexity of participation in daily life: a qualitative study of the experiences of persons with acquired brain injury. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:89–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe C, Rudd A, Mckevitt C, et al. Top ten priorities for stroke services research: a summary of the analysis of research for the national stroke strategy. Kings College London: University of London; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Bondas T, Hall T. Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research. Qual Health Res 2007;17:113–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalemans R, de Witte L, Lemmens J, et al. Measuring for rating social participation in people with aphasia: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2008;22:542–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel K, Wolfe C, Busch M, Mckevitt C. What are the social consequences of stroke for working aged adults: a systematic review. Stroke 2009;40:e431–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1988
   Google Scholar
• Petticrew M, Roberts H. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Rees R, Oliver K, Woodman J, Thomas J. Children’s views about obesity, body size, shape and weight: a systematic review. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research unit, Institute of Education, University of London; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Munro S, Lewin S, Smith H, et al. Patience adherence to tuberculosis treatment: a systematic review of qualitative research. PLoS Med 2007;4:1230–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8:45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins S, Lewin S, Smith H, et al. Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8:21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, et al. Using Meta ethnography to synthesis qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002;7:209–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, et al. Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med 2003;56:671–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood N, Mackenzie A. Informal caring for stroke survivors: meta-ethnographic review of qualitative literature. Maturitas 2010;66:268–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaszewski A, Alaszewski H, Potter J, Penhale B. Working after stroke: survivors experience and perception of barriers to and facilitators of the return to paid employment. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1858–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady M, Clark A, Dickson S, et al. The impact of stroke related dysarthria on social participation and implication for rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:178–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson S, Barbour R, Brady M, et al. Patients experience of disruptions associated with post stroke dysarthria. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2008;43:135–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilworth G, Phil M, Cert Ad, et al. Personal experience of returning to work following stroke: an exploratory study. Work 2009;34:95–103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Legg L, Stott D, Ellis G, Sellars C. Volunteer stroke services (VSS) groups for patients with communication difficulties after stroke: a qualitative analysis of the value of groups to their users. Clin Rehabil 2007;21:794–804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock S, Jordan L, Bryan K, Maxim J. Work after stroke focussing on barriers and enablers. Disab Soc 2005;20:33–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan P, Dyas J, Gladman J. Using an interview study of transport use by people who have had a stroke to inform rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:703–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northcott S, Hilari K. Why do people lose their friends after stroke? Int Lang Commun Dis 2011;46:524–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr S. Living with severe aphasia: tracking social exclusion. Aphasiology 2007;21:98–123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robison J, Wiles R, Ellis-Hill C, et al. Resuming previously valued activities post-stroke: who or what helps? Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1555–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson H, Ryan A. Impact of stroke consequences on spousal relationships from the perspective of the person with stroke. J Clin Nurs 2009;18:1803–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. A patient centred study of the consequences of stroke. Clin Rehabil 1998;12:338–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid D. Impact of the environment on role performance in older stroke survivors living at home. Int J Ther Rehabil 2004;11:567–73
   Google Scholar
• Murray C, Harrison B. The meaning and experience of being a stroke survivor: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:808–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter K, Hellings C, Floey N, Teasell R. The experience of living with stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:595–602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalemans R, de Witte L, Wade D, van den Heuvel W. Social participation through the eyes of people with aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2010;45:537–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman D, Herbert D, Reid D. Living in a restricted occupational world: the occupational experiences of stroke survivors who are wheelchair users and their caregivers. Can J Occup Ther 2006;73:141–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amarshi F, Artero L, Reid D. Exploring social and leisure participation among stroke survivors: part two. Int J Ther Rehabil 2006;13:166–70
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan C, Chard G. An exploration of participation in leisure activities post stroke. Aust Occup Ther J 2010;57:159–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan D, Jongbloed L. Factors influencing leisure activities following a stroke: an exploratory study. Can J Occup Ther 1990;57:223–9
   Google Scholar
• Rochette A, Desrosiers J, Bravo G, et al. Changes in participation after a mild stroke: quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Topics Stroke Rehabil 2007;14:59–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson B, Howe T, Worrall L, et al. Social participation for older people with aphasia: the impact of communication disability on friendships. Topics Stroke Rehabil 2008;15:325–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch E, Butt Z, Heinemann A, et al. A qualitative study of quality of life after stroke: the importance of social relationships. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:518–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, et al. The Stroke Association UK Stroke Survivor Needs Survey. London: The Stroke Association; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1445–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray D, Hollingsworth H, Stark S, Morgan K. Participation Survey/Mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:189–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelmblink F, Holmstrom I, Sanner M. The meaning of rehabilitation for older people who have survived stroke. J Nurs Healthcare Chronic Illn 2009;1:186–95
   Google Scholar
• Erikson A, Park M, Tham K. Belonging: a qualitative longitudinal study of what matters for persons after stroke during one year of rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 2010;42:831–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalley Hammell K. Dimensions of meaning in the occupations of daily life. Canadian J Occup Ther 2004;71:296–305
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barker D, Reid D, Cott C. Acceptance and meaning of wheelchair use in senior stroke survivors. J Occup Ther 2004;58:221–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Jones R, Gossett A, Morgan E. Examining barriers and supports to community living and participation after a stroke from a participatory action research approach. Topics Stroke Rehabil 2006;13:43–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, de Jong B, van den Bos G, et al. Beyond disability: perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition. Clin Rehabil 2002;16:27–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Alisa S, Baudo S, Mauro A, Miscio G. How does stroke restrict participation in long-term post-stroke survivors? Acta Neurol Scand 2005;112:157–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Social and practical strategies described by people living at home with stroke. Health Social Care Commun 1999;7:120–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochette A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levasseur M. Optimal participation: a reflective look. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1231–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood J, Connelly D, Maly M. Getting back to real living: a qualitative study of the process of community reintegration after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2010;24:1045–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perenboom R, Chorus A. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:577–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berges I, Seale G, Ostir G. The role of positive affect on social participation following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:2119–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Playford D, Siegert R, Levack W, Freeman J. Areas of consensus and controversy about goal setting in rehabilitation: a conference report. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:334–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack W, Dean S, Siegert R, McPherson K. Navigating patient centred goal setting in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: how clinicians control the process to meet perceived professional responsibilities. Patient Educ Couns 2011;85:206–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda S, Okawa Y. The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: what is it and what is it for? Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:596–601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade D, Halligan P. New wine in old bottles: the WHO ICF as an explanatory model of human behaviour. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:349–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. The issue is – an occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-some critical remarks. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:569–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelsma J. Use of the international Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a literature review. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:1–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerniauskaite M, Quintas R, Boldt C, et al. Systematic literature review on the ICF from 2001 to 2009: its use, implementation and operationalisation. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:281–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl T. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: an introduction and discussion of its potential impact on rehabilitation services and research. J Rehabil Med 2002;34:201–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie R. Demystifying disability: a review of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Sociol Health Illn 2004;26:287–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre A, Tempest S. Two steps forward, one step back? A commentary on the disease-specific core sets of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1474–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. Progress in improving stroke care, a good practice guide. London: The Stationary Office; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009;9:59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack W. The role of qualitative metasynthesis in evidence-based physical therapy. Phys Ther Rev 2012;17:390–7
   Google Scholar
• Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Post M, Asano M. Participation after spinal cord injury: the evolution of conceptualization and measurement. J Neurol Phys Ther 2005;29:147–56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar