Representations of disability and normality in rehabilitation technology promotional materials

References

• Linton S. Claiming disability: knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Perspectives on disability and rehabilitation. Contesting assumptions; challenging practice. New York: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Marks D. Disability. Controversial debates and psychosocial perspectives. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group; 1999
   Google Scholar
• Low JF. Historical and social foundations for practice. In: Trombly CA, Radomski MV, eds. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. 5th ed. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002:17–30
   Google Scholar
• Kuper A, Whitehead C, Hodges BD. Looking back to move forward: using history, discourse and text in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 73. Med Teach 2013;35:e849–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak R, Meyer M. Methods of critical discourse analysis. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Wendell S. The rejected body. Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group; 1996
   Google Scholar
• Krebs H, Dipietro L, Levy-Tzedek S, et al. A paradigm shift for rehabilitation robotics. Eng Med Bio Magazine 2008;27:61–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman M. Rehabilitation robotics from past to present – a historical perspectives. Adv Rehab Robotics 2004;306:25–44
   Google Scholar
• Fasoli SE, Ladenheim B, Mast J, Krebs HI. New horizons for robot-assisted therapy in pediatrics. Am J Phys Med Rehab 2012;11:280–9
   Google Scholar
• Morrison SA. Financial feasibility of robotics in neurorehabilitation. Top Spinal Cord Injury Rehab 2011;17:77–81
   Google Scholar
• Fisher P. Experiential knowledge challenges ‘normality’ and individualized citizenship: Towards ‘another way of being’. Disabil Soc 2007;22:283–98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser I. Disability and the promises of technology. Technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal. Inform Comm Soc 2006;9:373–95
   Google Scholar
• Kent B, Smith S. They only see it when the sun shines in my ears: exploring perceptions of adolescent hearing aid users. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2006;11:461–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly B. ‘Chocolate … makes you autism’: impairment, disability and childhood identities. Disabil Soc 2005;20:261–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devotta K, Wilton R, Yiannakoulias N. Representations of disability in the Canadian news media: a decade of change? Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:1859–68
   Google Scholar
• Moll LR, Cott CA. The paradox of normalization through rehabilitation: growing up and growing older with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:1276–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philips N, Hardy C. Discourse analysis: investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings. New York: Pantheon; 1980
   Google Scholar
• Eakin J, Robertson A, Poland B, et al. Towards a critical social science perspective on health promotion research. Heal Promot Int 1996;11:157–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker I. Critical discursive psychology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Shaw SE, Greenhalgh T. Best research – for what? Best health – for whom? A critical exploration of primary care research using discourse analysis. Soc Sci Med 2008;66:2506–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson BE, Teachman G, Wright V, et al. Children’s and parents’ beliefs regarding the value of walking: rehabilitation implications for children with cerebral palsy. Child: Care Health Devel 2011;38:61–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeever P, Miller KL. Mothering children who have disabilities: a Bourdieusian interpretation of maternal practices. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:1177–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosteels S, Van Hove G, Vandenbroeck M. The roller-coaster of experiences: becoming the parent of a deaf child. Disabil Soc 2012;27:983–96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidler J, Hamm LF, Lichy A, Groah SL. Automating activity-based interventions: the role of robotics. J Rehabil Res Devel 2008;45:337–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker K, Donnelly M. The social experiences of children with disability and the influence of environment: a framework for intervention. Disabil Soc 2001;16:71–85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heah T, Case T, McGuire B, Law M. Successful participation: the lived experience among children with disabilities. Can J Occup Ther 2007;74:38–47
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindsay S, McPherson AC. Experiences of social exclusion and bullying at school among children and youth with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:101–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebers T. Disability in theory. From social constructionism to the new realism of the body. In: Davis LJ, ed. The disability studies reader. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group; 2006:173–83
   Google Scholar
• Goggin G, Newell C. Uniting the nation? Disability, stem cells, and the Australian media. Disabil Soc 2004;19:57–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng S, Fennandez V, Buckrell B, Gregory K. Report on a school board’s interprofessional approach to managing the provision of hearing assistance technology for students with Auditory Processing Disorders. J Educ Audiology 2010;16:4–16
   Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Dyck I. Power and client-centred practice: an insider exploration of occupational therapists’ experiences. Can J Occup Ther 2006;73:261–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swain J, French S, Cameron C. Controversial issues in a disabling society. Philadelphia (PA): Open University Press; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Wieringa S. Is it time to drop the ‘knowledge translation’ metaphor? A critical literature review. J Royal Soc Med 2011;104:501–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS. The essential tension: selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1973
   Google Scholar
• Priestly M. Discourse and identity: disabled children in mainstream high schools. In: Corker M, French S, eds. Disability discourse. Philadelphia: Open University Press; 1999:92–102
   Google Scholar
• Thomas C. Parents and family: disabled women’s stories about their childhood experiences. In: Robinson C, Stalker K, eds. Growing up with disability. London: Jessica Kingsley; 1998:85–96
   Google Scholar
• Gibson BE, Teachman G. Critical approaches in physical therapy research: investigating the symbolic value of walking. Physiother Theory Pract 2012;28:474–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammell KW. Sacred texts: a skeptical exploration of the assumptions underpinning theories of occupation. Can J Occup Ther 2009;76:6–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Rethinking disability and what to do about it: disability studies and its implications for occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:487–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella EA, Whiteford G. Knowledge generation and utilization in occupational therapy: towards epistemic reflexivity. Aust Occup Ther J 2009;56:249–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan SK. Constructions of disability: a call for critical reflexivity in occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther 2011;78:164–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutbrown C. Naked by the pool? Blurring the image? Ethical issues in the portrayal of young children in arts-based educational research. Qual Inq 2010;17:3–14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan SK, Kinsella EA. Picture this … safety, dignity, and voice. Ethical research with children: practical considerations for the reflexive researcher. Qual Inq 2013;19:81–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding S. Rethinking standpoint epistemology: what is strong objectivity? In: Alcoff L, Porter E, eds. Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge; 1993:49–82
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber SN, Piatelli D. Holistic reflexivity. The feminist practice of reflexivity. In: Hesse-Biber SN, ed. Handbook of feminist research theory and praxis. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 2007:493–514
   Google Scholar
• Grue J. Discourse analysis and disability: some topics and issues. Discourse Soc 2011;22:532–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris J. Impairment and disability: constructing an ethics of care that promotes human rights. Hypatia 2001;16:1–16
   Google Scholar