A follow-up study on the relationship among participation, activity and motor function in survivors of stroke following constraint-induced therapy

References

• Lloyd-Jones D. Heart disease and stroke statistics 2010 update. A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010;121:E1–170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammel J, Jones R, Gossett A, Morgan E. Examining barriers and supports to community living and participation after a stroke from a participatory action research approach. Top Stroke Rehabil 2006;13:43–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok T, Lo R, Wong E, et al. Quality of life of stroke survivors: a 1-year follow-up study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:1177–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor “recovery” and “compensation” mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:313–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch E, Butt Z, Heinernann A, et al. A qualitative study of quality of life after stroke: the importance of social relationships. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:518–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White J, MacKenzie L, Magin P, Pollock M. The occupational experience of stroke survivors in a community setting. OTJR 2008;28:160–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson A, Aniansson A, Grimby G. Rehabilitation needs and disability in community living stroke survivors two years after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2006;6:30–47
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Taub E, Miller N, Novack T, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:347–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf S, Winstein C, Miller J, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006;296:2095–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azab M, Al-Jarrah M, Nazzal M, et al. Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) as home-based therapy on Barthel Index in patients with chronic stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2009;16:207–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettmers C, Teske U, Hamzei F, et al. Distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy improves functional outcome and quality of life after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:204–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl A, Askim T, Stock R, et al. Short- and long-term outcome of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: a randomized controlled feasibility trial. Clin Rehabil 2008;22:436–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin K-C, Wu C-Y, Wei T-H, et al. Effects of modified constraint induced movement therapy on reach-to-grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil 2007;21:1075–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feys H, De Weerdt W, Verbeke G, et al. Early and repetitive stimulation of the arm can substantially improve the long-term outcome after stroke: a 5-year follow-up study of a randomized trial. Stroke 2004;35:924–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peurala S, Kantanen M, Sjogren T, et al. Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy on activity and participation after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil 2011;23:209–26
   Google Scholar
• Corbetta D, Sirtori V, Moja L, Gatti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2010;46:537–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe V, Blanton S, Wolf S. Long-term follow-up after constraint-induced therapy: a case report of a chronic stroke survivor. Am J Occup Ther 2009;63:317–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin K-C, Huang Y-H, Hsieh Y-W, Wu C-Y. Potential predictors of motor and functional outcomes after distributed constraint-induced therapy for patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:336–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massie C, Malcolm MP, Greene D, Thaut M. The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:571–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Wolf S. Constraint induced movement techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil 1997;3:38–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris D, Uswatte G, Crago J, et al. The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:750–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, et al. The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology 2006;67:1189–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirtori V, Corbetta D, Moja L, Gatti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in patients with stroke. Stroke 2010;41:e57–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcolm MP, Massie C, Thaut M. Rhythmic auditory-motor entrainment improves hemiparetic arm kinematics during reaching movements: a pilot study. Top Stroke Rehabil 2009;16:69–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massie C, Malcolm MP, Greene D, Thaut M. The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:571–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state – practical method for grading cognitive state of patients for clinician. J Psychol Res 1975;12:189–98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J, Kosinski M, Bjorner J, et al. User’s manual for the SF-36v2 health survey. 2nd ed. Lincoln (RI): Quality Metric Inc; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Radloff L. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977;1:385–401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson LR, et al. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther 1993;73:447–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf S, Barton L. Forced use in hemiplegic upper extremities to reserve the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989;104:125–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atler K. The daily experiences of pleasure, productivity and restoration profile: a measure of subjective experiences. In: Pierce D, ed. Occupational science for occupational therapy. Thorofare (NJ): Slack Incorporated; 2013:187–99
   Google Scholar
• Reis HT. Why researchers should think “real-world”: a conceptual rationale. In: Mehl MR, Conner TS, eds. Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York (NY): The Guilford Press; 2012:3–21
   Google Scholar
• Harvey A, Pentland W. Time use research. In: Pentland W, Harvey A, Lawton M, McColl M, eds. Time use research in the social sciences. New York (NY): Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 1999:3–18
   Google Scholar
• Robinson J, Godbey G. Time in our hands. Futurist 2005;September–October:18–22
   Google Scholar
• Morgan G, Gliner J, Harmon R. Understanding and evaluating research in applied and clinical settings. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2006
   Google Scholar
• American Occupational Therapy Association. Occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process. Am J Occup Ther 2008;62:625–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baum C, Edwards D. Activity card sort. St. Louis (MO): Washington University; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation – a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999;36:237–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Ring H, et al. Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:559–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo N, Wood-Dauphinee S, Cote R, et al. Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1035–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna K, Liddle J, Brown A, et al. Comparison of time use, role participation and life satisfaction of older people after stroke with a sample without stroke. Aust Occup Ther J 2009;56:177–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Rochette A, Noreau L, et al. Long-term changes in participation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2006;13:86–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts P, Vegher J, Gilewski M, et al. Client-centered occupational therapy using constraint-induced therapy. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2005;14:115–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayner K, Gibson G, Giles GM. Research scholars initiative – comparison of constraint-induced movement therapy and bilateral treatment of equal intensity in people with chornic upper-extremity dysfunction after cerebrovascular accident. Am J Occup Ther 2010;64:529–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillot AJ. Perceptions and experiences of two survivors of stroke who participated in constraint-induced movement therapy home programs. Am J Occup Ther 2003;57:168–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cott C, Wiles R, Devitt R. Continuity, transition and participation: preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1566–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallenbert I, Jonsson H. Waiting to get better: a dilemma regarding habits in daily occupations after stroke. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:218–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochette A, Tribble DS, Desrosiers J, et al. Adaptation and coping following a first stroke: a qualitative analysis of a phenomenological orientation. Int J Rehabil Res 2006;29:247–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JP, Connelly DM, Maly MR. ‘Getting back to real living’: a qualitative study of the process of community reintegration after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2010;24:1045–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler D, Dubouloz C-J, Urbanowski R, Egan M. Meaning perspective transformation following stroke: the process of change. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1056–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochette A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levasseur M. Optimal participation: a reflective look. Disabil Rehabil 2006;19:1231–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White J, Gray K, Magin P, et al. Exploring the experience of post-stroke fatigue in community dwelling stroke survivors: a prospective qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:1376–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi T, Johansson U. The lived experience of engaging in everyday occupations in persons with mild to moderate aphasia. Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:1828–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Zeem CH, Visser-Meily JM, Lindeman E, et al. Participation in the chronic phase of stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2013;20:52–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsouna-Hadjis E, Vemmos K, Zapkopoulos N, Stamatelopoulos S. First-stroke recovery process: the role of family social support. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:881–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman T, McKenna K. Prediction of outcome after stroke: implications for clinical practice. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 2001;19:53–75
   Google Scholar
• Glass T, Matchar D, Belyea M, Feussner J. Impact of social support on outcome in first stroke. Stroke 1993;24:64–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhogal S, Teasell R, Foley N, Speechley M. Community reintegration after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2003;10:107–29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glass T, Maddox G. The quality and quantity of social support: stroke recovery as psycho-social transition. Soc Sci Med 1992;34:1249–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris JE, Eng JJ, Miller WC, Dawson AS. The role of caregiver involvement in upper-limb treatment in individuals with subacute stroke. Phys Ther 2010;90:1302–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar