Factors affecting speech pathologists’ implementation of stroke management guidelines: a thematic analysis

References

• Quinn TJ, Paolucci S, Sunnerhagen KS, et al.; European Stroke Organisation Executive Committee, E. S. O. Writing Committee. Evidence-based stroke rehabilitation: an expanded guidance document from the european stroke organisation (ESO) guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. J Rehab Med 2009;41:99–111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigin VL, Lawes CMM, Bennett DA, et al. Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:355–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowers HL, Silver FL, Fang J, et al. The incidence, co-occurrence, and predictors of dysphagia, dysarthria, and aphasia after first-ever acute ischemic stroke. J Commun Disord 2013;46:238–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett DL, Rosenberg W, Gray J, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996;312:71–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speech Pathology Australia. Evidence-Based Practice in Speech Pathology [Position Statement] [Internet] 2010. Available from: http://www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au/library/position_statements/EBP_in_SP.pdf [last accessed 26 Nov 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Association AS-L-H. Evidence-based practice in communication disorders [Position statement] [Internet]. 2005. Available from: http://www.asha.org/docs/html/PS2005-00221.htm [last accessed 1 Jul 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Francke AL, Smit MC, de Veer AJE, Mistiaen P. Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Med Infor Decis Making 2008;8:38–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management 2010 [Internet]. 2010 – [updated 2010 Dec 03; cited 2011 May 31]. Available from: http://strokefoundation.com.au/site/media/clinical_guidelines_stroke_managment_2010_interactive.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Clinical Guidelines for Acute Stroke Management [Internet]. 2007. Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/cp109_acute_stroke_management.pdf [last accessed 15 Feb 2014]
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke rehabilitation and recovery. Melbourne: National Stroke Foundation; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard IJ, Harris D, Kilkenny MF, et al. Adherence to clinical guidelines improves patient outcomes in australian audit of stroke rehabilitation practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93:965–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane LJ, Olson CA, Murray S, et al. Gaps between knowing and doing: understanding and assessing the barriers to optimal health care. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2007;27:94–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evensen A, Sanson-Fisher R, D'Este C, Fitzgerald M. Trends in publications regarding evidence-practice gaps: a literature review. Implement Sci 2010;5:11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. National Stroke Audit Acute Services: Clinical Audit Report 2011 [Internet]. Available from: http://strokefoundation.com.au/site/media/National_stroke_audit_acute_services_clinical_audit_report_2011.pdf [last accessed 26 Nov 2012]
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. National Stroke Audit: Rehabilitation Services Report 2012 [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://strokefoundation.com.au/site/media/NSF_Audit-Report_2012_web.pdf [last accessed 26 Nov 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Holloway RG, Benesch C, Rush SR. Stroke prevention: narrowing the evidence-practice gap. Neurology 2000;54:1899–906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitton C, Adair CE, McKenzie E, et al. Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Quart 2007;85:729–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006;26:13–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belkhodja O, Amara N, Landry R, Ouimet M. The extent and organizational determinants of research utilization in Canadian health services organizations. Sci Commun 2007;28:377–417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires J, Estabrooks C, Gustavsson P, Wallin L. Individual determinants of research utilization by nurses: a systematic review update. Implement Sci 2011;6:1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugtenberg M, Zegers-van Schaick J, Westert GP, Burgers JS. Why don't physicians adhere to guideline recommendations in practice? An analysis of barriers among Dutch general practitioners. Implement Sci 2009;4:54–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardi A, Brouwers M, Palda V, et al. How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Implement Sci 2011;6:26–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson F, Doig GS. The relative effectiveness of practice change interventions in overcoming common barriers to change: a survey of 14 hospitals with experience implementing evidence-based guidelines. J Eval Clin Pract 2007;13:709–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbins M, Hanna S, Ciliska D, et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies. Implement Sci 2009;4:61–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkennes S, Dodd K. Guideline implementation in allied health professions: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:296–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Can Med Assoc J 1995;153:1423–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Tetroe J. Implementing clinical guidelines: current evidence and future implications. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2004;24:S31–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grimshaw J, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:1–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, et al. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ 1998;317:465–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson D, Estabrooks C, Scott-Findlay S, et al. Interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2007;2:15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott S, Albrecht L, O'Leary K, et al. Systematic review of knowledge translation strategies in the allied health professions. Implement Sci 2012;7:70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudsawad P. Knowledge translation: introduction to models, strategies and measures [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://www.ncddr.org/kt/products/ktintro/ktintro.pdf [last accessed 26 Nov 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Helfrich C, Damschroder L, Hagedorn H, et al. A critical synthesis of literature on the promoting action on research implementation in health services (PARIHS) framework. Implement Sci 2010;5:82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies P, Walker A, Grimshaw J. A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implement Sci 2010;5:14–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon A, Korner-Bitensky N, Kastner M, et al. Strategies for rehabilitation professionals to move evidence-based knowledge into practice: a systematic review. J Rehab Med 2009;41:1024–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiwe S, Kajermo KN, Tyni-Lenné R, et al. Evidence-based practice: attitudes, knowledge and behaviour among allied health care professionals. Int J Qual Health Care 2011;23:198–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortteisto T, Kaila M, Komulainen J, et al. Healthcare professionals' intentions to use clinical guidelines: a survey using the theory of planned behaviour. Implement Sci 2010;5:51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington L, Roddam H, Burton C, et al. Promoting research use in speech and language therapy: a cluster randomized controlled trial to compare the clinical effectiveness and costs of two training strategies. Clin Rehabil 2005;19:387–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie NN, Kagan A, O'Neill Christie C, et al. Communicative access and decision making for people with aphasia: implementing sustainable healthcare systems change. Aphasiology 2007;21:39–66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molfenter SM, Ammoury A, Yeates EM, Steele CM. Decreasing the knowledge-to-action gap through research-clinical partnerships in speech-language pathology. Can J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 2009;33:82–8
   Google Scholar
• Verna A, Davidson B, Rose T. Speech-language pathology services for people with aphasia: a survey of current practice in Australia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2009;11:191–205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallino-Napoli LD, Reilly S. Evidence-based health care: a survey of speech pathology practice. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2004;6:107–12
   Google Scholar
• Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press Australia and New Zealand; 2009 (384 p)
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77–101
   Google Scholar
• Milne J, Oberle K. Enhancing rigor in qualitative description. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2005;32:413–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann T, Bennett S, Del Mar C. Evidence based practice: across the health professions. Sydney: Elsevier; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Cachia M, Millward L. The telephone medium and semi-structured interviews: a complementary fit. Qual Res Organ Manage 2011;6:265–77
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Writing a good read: strategies for re-presenting qualitative data. Res Nurs Health 1998;21:375–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas E, Magilvy JK. Qualitative rigor or research validity in qualitative research. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2011;16:151–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: myths and strategies. Int J Nurs Stud 2010;47:1451–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salbach NM, Veinot P, Jaglal SB, et al. From continuing education to personal digital assistants: what do physical therapists need to support evidence-based practice in stroke management? J Eval Clin Pract 2010;17:1–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rappolt S, Tassone M. How rehabilitation therapists gather, evaluate, and implement new knowledge. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2002;22:170–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M, Oxman A. Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002;7:239–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson GN, Estabrooks CA, Degner LF. Clarifying the concepts in knowledge transfer: a literature review. J Adv Nurs 2006;53:691–701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Clinical Tools [Internet] 2012. Available from: http://strokefoundation.com.au/health-professionals/clinical-tools/ [last accessed 26 Nov 2012]
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Implementing the Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management, A guide to changing practice for stroke clinicians [Internet]. Melbourne: 2011. Available from: http://strokefoundation.com.au/site/media/Implementing_clinical_guidelines_stroke_management_2010.pdf [last accessed 26 Nov 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Ploeg J, Davies B, Edwards N, et al. Factors influencing best-practice guideline implementation: lessons learned from administrators, nursing staff, and project leaders. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2007;4:210–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham F, Ranmuthugala G, Westbrook J, Braithwaite J. Net benefits: assessing the effectiveness of clinical networks in Australia through qualitative methods. Implement Sci 2012;7:108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watine J, Friedberg B, Nagy E, et al. Conflict between guideline methodologic quality and recommendation validity: a potential problem for practitioners (Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization). Clin Chem 2006;52:65–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavis J, Ross S, McLeod C, Gildiner A. Measuring the impact of health research. J Health Serv Res Policy 2003;8:165–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Litosseliti L, Leadbeater C. Speech and language therapy/pathology: perspectives on a gendered profession. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2012;48:90–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar