References
- Imrie R. Disability and the city. London and New York: Sage Publications; 1996
- Imrie R, Hall P. Inclusive design. London: Routledge; 2001
- Sanford, J. Universal design as a rehabilitation strategy. 1st ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2012
- These ideas are enshrined in the seven principles of universal design: Equitable use; Flexibility in use; Simple and Intuitive Use; Perceptible information; Tolerance for error; Low physical effort; Size and space for approach and use
- Burgstahler S. Universal Design of Instruction (UDI): definition, principles, guidelines, and examples. Seattle: University of Washington; 2007
- Steinfeld E. Danford G, eds. Enabling environments. Measuring the impact of environment on disability and rehabilitation. New York: Kluwer/Plenum; 1999
- Details about the ESRC seminar series are available at the following web site. Available from: http://universalisingdesign.info/esrc/ [last accessed 12 Jun 2014]
- The outcomes of the workshop with Southwark Disablement Association are featured on the following web site. Available from: http://universalisingdesign.info/sda/ [last accessed 12 Jun 2014]
- Findeli A. Rethinking design education for the 21st century: theoretical methodological and ethical discussion. Des Issues 2001;17:5–17
- Imrie R. Universalism, universal design and equitable access to the built environment. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:873–88
- Imrie R. Designing inclusive environments and the significance of universal design. In: Swain J, French S, Barnes C, Thomas C, eds. Disabling barriers – enabling environments. London: Sage Publications; 2014:287–96
- McRuer R. Crip theory: cultural signs of queerness and disability. Cultural Front Series. New York and London: New York University Press; 2006
- The notion of universal ablebodiness is akin to McRuer’s [12] understanding that the dominant value system, worldwide, is “compulsory ablebodiness or the inculcation of the normality of the able body or the body without impairment”
- Steinfeld E, Smith R. Universal design for quality of life technologies. In: Schulz R, ed. Quality of life technology handbook. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2012:107–30
- Lid IM. What can be achieved by universal design? An investigation of various aspects of the concept. FORMakademisk 2009;17:17–27
- Lionnet F. Postcolonial representations: women, literature, identity. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1995
- Garland Thompson R. Introduction to DSQ special topic section: new conversations in disability studies. Disabil Stud Quart 2012;32:4
- Marion Young I. Justice and the politics of difference. New York: Princeton University Press; 1990
- Lott E. After identity, politics: the return of universalism. New Literary History 2000;4:665–78
- Idhe D. Technology and the lifeworld: from garden to earth. Bloomington (IN): Indiana University Press; 1990
- Verbeek PP. What things do: philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. University Park (PA): Pennsylvania State University Press; 2005
- De Preester H. Equipment and existential spatiality: Heidegger, cognitive science and the prosthetic subject. In: Kiverstein J, Wheeler M, eds. Heidegger and cognitive science: new directions in philosophy and cognitive science. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan; 2012:276–308
- Battarbee K. Co-experience: understanding user experiences in social interaction [academic dissertation]. Publication series of the University of Art and Design Helsinki A 51:2004
- Greenblatt S. The improvisation of power. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; 1980
- Hamraie A. Universal design research as a new materialist practice. Disabil Stud Quart 2012;32:4