Universal design and the challenge of diversity: reflections on the principles of UD, based on empirical research of people’s mobility

References

• Barnes C, Mercer G, Shakespeare T. Exploring disability. A sociological introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1999
   Google Scholar
• Bickenbach JE. Minority rights or universal participation: the politics of disablement. In: Jones M, Basser Marks LA, eds. Disability, divers-ability and legal change. The Hague/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1998:101–16
   Google Scholar
• Oliver M, Barnes C. Disabled people and social policy: from exclusion to inclusion. London and New York: Longman; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Scotch KR, Schriner K. Disability as human variation: implications for policy. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 1997;549:148–59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace R. A perspective on universal design. In: Designing for the 21st century: an International Conference on Universal Design, Hempstead; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Mace R. Universal design in housing. Assist Technol: The official Journal of RESNA 1998;10:21–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace R, Hardie GJ, Place JP. Accessible environments: toward universal design. In: Preiser WFE, Vischer JC, Whites ET, eds. Design intervention: toward a more humane architecture. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1991:1–44
   Google Scholar
• Gossett A, Mirza M, Barnds AK, Feidt D. Beyond access: a case study on the intersection between accessibility, sustainability, and universal design. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2009;4:439–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mueller JL. Assistive technology and universal design in the workplace. Assist Technol: The official Journal of RESNA 1998;10:37–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preiser WFE. Universal design: from policy to assessment research and practice. Archnet-IJAR, Int J Architect Res 2008;2:78–93
   Google Scholar
• Preiser WFE, Ostroff E, eds. Universal design handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Peterson W. Public polilcy affecting universal design. Assist Technol: The official Journal of RESNA 1998;10:13–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Story MF. Maximizing usability: the principles of universal design. Assist Technol: The official Journal of RESNA 1998;10:4–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Story MF, Mueller JL, Mace RL. The universal design file. designing for people of all ages and abilities. North Carolina State University: T.C.f.U. Design; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Zola IK. Toward the necessary universalizing of a disability policy. Milbank Quat 1989;67:401–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akrich M. A Gazogene in Costa Rica. An experiment in techno-sociology. In: Lemonnier P, ed. Technological choices. Transformation in material cultures since the neolithic. London: Routledge; 1993:289–337
   Google Scholar
• Callon M, Law J. On the construction of sociotechnical networks: content and context revisited. Knowled Soc: Studies in the Sociology of Science Past and Present 1989;8:57–83
   Google Scholar
• Latour B. Technology is society made durable. In Law J, ed. A sociology of monsters. sociological review monograph. London: Routledge; 1991:103–31
   Google Scholar
• Latour B. La clef de Berlin et autres leçons d'un amateur de sciences. Paris: La Découverte; 1993
   Google Scholar
• Latour B. When things strike back: a possible contribution of ‘science studies' to the social sciences. Br J Sociol 2000;51:107–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akrich M. The De-scription of technical objects. In: Bijker W, Law J, eds. Shaping technology, building society: studies in sociotechnical changes. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1992:105–224
   Google Scholar
• Callon M, Law J. Agency and the hybrid collectif. South Atlantic Quat 1995;94:481–507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour B. A dialog on actor network theory with a (somewhat) socratic professor application. In: Avgerou C, Ciborra C, Land F, eds. The social study of information and communication technology: innovation, actors, and contexts. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003:62–76
   Google Scholar
• Winance M. Trying out wheelchair. The mutual shaping of people and devices through adjustment. Sci, Technol Human Values 2006;31:52–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galis V. Enacting disability: how can science and technology studies inform disability studies? Disabil Soc 2011;26:825–38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser I, Law J. “Making voices”: disability, technology and articulation. 1998. Paper presented at Politics of Technology Conference: Maastricht, The Netherlands
   Google Scholar
• Pols J. Washing the citizen: washing, cleanliness and citizenship in mental health care. Culture, Med Psychiatr 2006;30:77–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslaksen F, Bergh S, Bringa OR, Heggem EK. Universal design: planning and design for all. Oslo: The Norwegian State Council on Disability; 1997
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Dictionary online. Available from: http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/regardless?q=regardless, via the INTERNET [last accessed 12 Jul 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Despret V, Strivay L. Corps et âme. Passionnément. SociologieS [En ligne], Dossiers, Émotions et sentiments, réalité et fiction. INTERNET; 2010. Available from: http://sociologies.revues.org/3163 via hte INTERNET [last accessed 24 Jun 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Imrie R. Universalism, universal design and equitable access to the built environment. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:873–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galis V. From Shrieks to Technical Reports: technology, disability and political processes in building Athens metro [dissertation]. Linköping: Linköping University; 2006. 275 p
   Google Scholar
• Law J. Networks, Relations, Cyborgs: on the Social Study of Technology. Lancaster: Center for Science Studies, Lancaster University [online]. INTERNET. 2003. Available from: http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/sociology/research/publications/papers/law-networks-relations-cyborgs.pdf via the INTERNET [last accessed 28 Mar 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Moser I. Good passages, bad passages. In: Law J, Hassard J, eds. Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999:196–219
   Google Scholar
• Pols J, Moser I. Cold technologies versus warm care? On affective and social relations with and through care technologies. Alter, Eur J Disabil Res 2009;3:159–78
   Google Scholar
• Moser I. Against normalisation: subverting norms of ability and disability. Sci Culture 2000;9:201–40
   Google Scholar
• Mazurik K, Desjardins M, de Grosbois E, et al. Individual stakes and collective ideology in tension: looking at physical and spatial obstacles from an experiential perspective. ALTER, Eur J Disabil Res 2014;8. [Epub ahead of print]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2014.02.008
   Google Scholar
• Poldma T, Labbé D, Bertina S, et al. Understanding people’s needs in a commercial public space: about accessibility and lived experience in social settings. ALTER, Eur J Disabil Res 2014;8. [Epub ahead of print]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2014.02.007
   Google Scholar
• Steinfeld E. Position paper: the future of universal design. Buffalo: IDEA Center, University at Buffalo; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Erkilic M. Conceptual challenges between universal design and disability in relation to the body, impairment, and the environment. Where does the issue of disability stand in the philosophy of UD? METU JFA 2011;28:181–203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law J. Political Philosophy and Disabled Specificities’. Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University: Lancaster [online]. INTERNET. 1999. Available from: http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/sociology/research/publications/papers/law-political-philosophy-and-disabilities.pdf via the INTERNET [last accessed 28 Mar 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Nijs G, Daems A. And what if the tangible were not, and vice versa? on boundary works in everyday mobility experience of people moving into old age. Space Culture 2012;15:186–97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heylighen A. Challenging prevailing ways of understanding and designing space. In: Spatial cognition for architectural design SCAD 2011 Symposium Proceedings. Bremen/Freiburg: Transregional Collaborative Research Center SFB/TR 8 Spatial Cognition Universitat Bremen/Universitat Freiburg; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Heylighen A, Nijs G. Designing in the absence of sight: design cognition re-articulated. Design Stud 2013;35:113–32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar