References
- Inouye M. Predicting outcomes of patients in Japan after first acute stroke using a simple model. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80: 645–9
- Veerbeek JM, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EE, et al. Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review. Stroke 2011;42:1482–8
- World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001
- Fiorelli M, Alperovitch A, Argentino C, et al. Prediction of long-term outcome in the early hours following acute ischemic stroke. Italian acute stroke study group. Arch Neurol 1995;52:250–5
- Johnston KC, Wagner DP, Wang XQ, et al. Validation of an acute ischemic stroke model: does diffusion-weighted imaging lesion volume offer a clinically significant improvement in prediction of outcome? Stroke 2007;38:1820–5
- Reid JM, Gubitz GJ, Dai D, et al. Predicting functional outcome after stroke by modelling baseline clinical and CT variables. Age Ageing 2010;39:360–6
- Sato S, Toyoda K, Uehara T, et al. Baseline NIH Stroke Scale Score predicting outcome in anterior and posterior circulation strokes. Neurology 2008;70:2371–7
- Weimar C, Roth M, Willig V, et al. Development and validation of a prognostic model to predict recovery following intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurol 2006;253:788–93
- Weimar C, Ziegler A, Konig IR, Diener HC. Predicting functional outcome and survival after acute ischemic stroke. J Neurol 2002;249:888–95
- Sánchez-Blanco I, Ochoa-Sangrador C, López-Munaín L, et al. Predictive model of functional independence in stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation programme. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:464–75
- Eyssen IC, Steultjens MP, Dekker J, Terwee CB. A systematic review of instruments assessing participation: challenges in defining participation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:983–97
- Whiteneck G, Dijkers MP. Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:S22–35
- Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ahmed S, et al. Disablement following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:258–68
- Duncan PW, Jorgensen HS, Wade DT. Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke 2000;31:1429–38
- Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Cote R, et al. Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1035–42
- van der Zee CH, Visser-Meily JM, Lindeman E, et al. Participation in the chronic phase of stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2013;20:52–61
- De Wit L, Putman K, Schuback B, et al. Motor and functional recovery after stroke: a comparison of 4 European rehabilitation centers. Stroke 2007;38:2101–7
- The World Health Organization Monica Project (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): a major international collaboration. Who MONICA Project Principal Investigators. J Clin Epidemiol 1988;41:105–14
- Lincoln N, Leadbitter D. Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. Physiotherapy 1979;65:48–51
- Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J 1965;14:61–5
- Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The sickness impact profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981;19:787–805
- Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, Foley NC, Bitensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:507–28
- Mock C. The sickness impact profile (SIP) in the assessment of the long-term functional outcome of an injured patient. In: Mock C, ed. The sickness impact profile (SIP) in the assessment of the long-term functional outcome of an injured patient. 3rd International Conference Measuring the Burden of Injury; 1994
- Pollard WE, Bobbitt RA, Bergner M, et al. The sickness impact profile: reliability of a health status measure. Med Care 1976;14:146–55
- De Wit L, Putman K, Dejaeger E, et al. Use of time by stroke patients: a comparison of four european rehabilitation centers. Stroke 2005;36:1977–83
- Putman K, de Wit L, Schupp W, et al. Use of time by physiotherapists and occupational therapists in a stroke rehabilitation unit: a comparison between four european rehabilitation centres. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1417–24
- Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2004:35:2529–39
- Langhorne P, Wagenaar R, Partridge C. Physiotherapy after stroke: more is better? Physiother Res Int 1996;1:75–88
- Putman K, De Wit L, Schupp W, et al. Variations in follow-up services after inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a multicentre study. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:646–53
- Clark MS, Smith DS. Psychological correlates of outcome following rehabilitation from stroke. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:129–40
- Glass TA, Matchar DB, Belyea M, Feussner JR. Impact of social support on outcome in first stroke. Stroke 1993;24:64–70
- Meijer R, Ihnenfeldt DS, de Groot IJ, et al. Prognostic factors for ambulation and activities of daily living in the subacute phase after stroke. A systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:119–29
- Roberts L, Counsell C. Assessment of clinical outcomes in acute stroke trials. Stroke 1998;29:986–91