Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Lower Limb Functional Index

References

• Rogers JC, Irrgang JJ. Measures of adult lower extremity function. Arthritis Rheum 2003;49:67–84
   Google Scholar
• Myers AM, Holliday PJ, Harvey KA, Hutchinson KS. Functional performance measures: are they superior to self-assessments. J Gerontol 1993;48:196–206
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ader D. Developing the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Med Care 2007;45:1–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou WH, Yeh T, Liang HW. Reliability and validity of Taiwan Chinese version of Lower Extremity Functional Scale. J Formos Med Assoc 2012;113:1–8
   Google Scholar
• Vargas-Cuesta A, Gabel PC. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the upper limb functional index. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013;11:126–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayers PM, Machin D, eds. Principles of measurement scales. In: Quality of life: assessment, analysis and interpretaion of patient-reported outcomes. 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2007:31–48
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:1417–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JG, Young NL. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:239–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Donner A, et al. Responsiveness of the Short Form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am 2000;25:330–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel CP, Burkett B. The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI): development and determination of reliability, validity and responsiveness. J Hand Ther 2006;19:328–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koçyigit H, Aydemir Ö, Fisek G. Realibility and validity of Turkish version of Short Form-36. Med Ther Mag 1999;12:102–6
   Google Scholar
• Tüzün EH, Eker L, Aytar A, et al. Acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005;13:28–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atamaz F, Hepguler S, Oncu J. Translation and validation of the Turkish version of the arthritis impact measurement scales 2 in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2005;32:1331–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, Riddle DL. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. Phys Ther 1999;79:371–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, et al. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int 2005;26:968–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt K, Hurwit D. Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research. J Bone Joint Surg 2013;95:e118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gabel CP, Melloh M, Burkett B, Michener LA. Clinimetric properties Lower Limb Functional Index: development and and clinimetric properties. Phys Ther 2012;92:1–13
   Google Scholar
• Shultz S, Olszewski A, Ramsey O, et al. A systematic review of outcome tools used to measure lower leg conditions. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2013;8:838–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T, et al. Chapter 3: European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J 2006;15:S169–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (PA 1976) 2000;25:3186–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin M, Kosinski K, Bjorner JB, et al. Item response theory methods can improve the measurement of physical function by combining the modified health assessment questionnaire and the SF-36 physical function. Qual Life Res 2007;16:647–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The Timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39:142–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go test. Phys Ther 2000;80:896–903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yelnik A, Bonan I. Clinical tools for assessing balance disorders. Neurophysiol Clin 2008;38:439–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung TS, Wessel J, Stratford PW, MacDermid JC. The timed up-and-go test for use on an inpatient orthopaedic rehabilitation ward. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2008;38:410–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks D, Davis AM, Naglie G. Validity of 3 physical performance measures in inpatient geriatric rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:105–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freter SH, Fruchter N. Relationship between Timed ‘Up and Go' and gait time in an elderly orthopaedic rehabilitation population. Clin Rehabil 2000;14:96–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bombardier C, Melfi CA, Paul J, et al. Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery. Med Care 1995;33:131–44
   Google Scholar
• Jette DU, Jette AM. Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with knee impairments. Phys Ther 1996;76:1178–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Stratford PW. Getting more from the Literature: estimating the standard error of measurement from reliability studies. Physiother Can 2004;56:27–30
   Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:141–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello AB, Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval 2005;10:1–9
   Google Scholar
• Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods 1999;4:272–99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson B, Trapp R. Basic and clinical biostatistics. 2nd ed. Sydney: McGraw Hill Publishers; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Cuesta Vargas AI, Gabel CP. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Lower Limb Functional Index. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2014;12:75–83
   Google Scholar
• Apolone G, Mosconi P. The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1025–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe R. Confidence intervals for the mean of a variable taking the values 0, 1 and 2. Stat Med 2003;22:2737–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel CP, Michener LA, Melloh M, Burkett B. Modification of the upper limb functional index to a three-point response improves clinimetric properties. J Hand Ther 2010;23:41–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grotle M, Wilkens P, Garratt AM, et al. Which Roland–Morris disability questionnaire? Rasch analysis of four different versions tested in a Norwegian population. J Rehabil Med 2013;45:670–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent P, Lauridsen HH. Managing missing scores on the Roland Morris disability questionnaire. Spine (PA 1976) 2011;36:1878–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnussen LH, Lygren H, Strand LI, et al. Reconsidering the Roland–Morris disability questionnaire: time for a multidimensional framework? Spine (PA 1976) 2015;40:257–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar