Teachers’ perceptions of Twitter for professional development

References

• US Department of Education. No Child Left Behind. [Internet]. Available from: http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml [last accessed 9 Dec 2014]
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Education. Individuals with Disabilities in Education. [Internet]. Available from: http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/%2Croot%2Cstatute%2C [last accessed 9 Dec 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Schmucki L, Sivin-Kachala J. [Internet]. Final report: school principals and social networking in education: practices, policies, and realities in 2010. Available from: http://www.edweb.net/fimages/op/PrincipalsandSocialNetworkingReport.pdf [last accessed 16 Nov 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Morewood AL, Ankrum JW, Bean RM. Educators’ perceptions of the influence of professional development on their knowledge of content, pedagogy, and curriculum. College Read Assoc Yearbook 2010;31:201–19
   Google Scholar
• McGiboney M. [Internet]. Twitter: the sweet smell of success. Available from: http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/twitters-tweet-smell-of-success/ [last accessed 6 Nov 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Zepeda S. Professional development: what works? Larchmont (NY): Eye on Education; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Wei RC, Darling-Hammond L, Adamson F. [Internet]. Professional development in the United States: trends and challenges. Dallas (TX): National Staff Development Council. Available from: http://www.learningforward.org/stateproflearning.cfm [last accessed 6 Nov 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Espuny C, González J, Lleixá M, Gisbert M. University students’ attitudes towards and expectations of the educational use of social networks. Rev Univ Soc Conoc (RUSC) 2011;8:6–199
   Google Scholar
• Viel-Ruma K, Houchins D, Jolivette K, Benson G. Efficacy beliefs of special educators: the relationships among collective efficacy, teacher self-efficacy, and job satisfaction. Teach Educ Spec Educ 2010;33:205–33
   Google Scholar
• Trachtman R. Inquiry and accountability in professional development schools. J Educ Res 2007;100:197–203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language Hearing Association [Internet]. Rockville, MD. Schools survey caseload report. July 2014. Available from: http://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/2014-SLP-Schools-Survey-Caseload-Report.pdf [last accessed 15 Nov 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Baxter S, Brookes C, Bianchi K, et al. Speech and language therapists and teachers working together: exploring the issues. Child Lang Teach Ther 2009;25:215–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis K. Exploring virtual PLCs: professional development for the busy practitioner. 32 SIG 16 Perspectives on School-Based Issues 2013;14:28–32
   Google Scholar
• Barton E, Moore H, Squires J. Preparing speech-language pathologists to work in early childhood. Topics Early Child Spec Educ 2012;32:4–13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar D, Rosa-Lugo L. The critical shortage of Speech–Language Pathologists in the public school setting: features of the work environment that affect recruitment and retention. Lang Speech Hear Serv Schools 2007;38:31–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kear K. Online and social networking communities: a best practice guide for educators. New York (NY): Routledge; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Wenger E. Knowledge management as a doughnut: shaping your knowledge strategy through communities of practice. Ivey Business J 2004;Jan--Feb:1–8
   Google Scholar
• Wenger E, White N, Smith J. Digital habitats: stewarding technology for communities. Portland (OR): CPSquare; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Stevens Ken. Collaborative professional education for e-teaching in networked schools. Proc World Acad Sci Eng Technol 2008;28:425–9
   Google Scholar
• Couros A. Developing personal learning networks for open and social learning. In: Veletsianos G, ed. Emerging technologies in distance education. Edmonton, AB: Althabasca University Press; 2010:109–28
   Google Scholar
• Pettenati MC, Cigognini ME. Social networking theories and tools to support connectivist learning activities. Int J Web Based Learn Teach Technol 2007;2:42–60
   Google Scholar
• Gehrke R, McCoy K. Considering the context: differences between the environments of beginning special educators who stay and those who leave. Rural Spec Educ Quart 2007;26:32–40
   Google Scholar
• Mulwaney L. Laugh so you don’t cry: teachers combating isolation in schools through humor and social support. Ethnography Educ 2008;3:195–209
   Google Scholar
• Hur JW, Brush T. Teacher participation in online communities: why do teachers want to participate in self-generated online communities of K-12 teachers? J Res Technol Educ 2009;41:279–303
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap J, Lowenthal P. Tweeting the night away: using Twitter to enhance social presence. J Inform Syst Educ 2009;20:129–35
   Google Scholar
• Ebner M. Introducing live microblogging: how single presentations can be enhanced by the mass? J Res Innov Teach 2009;2:91–100. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.nu.edu/OurPrograms/ResearchCouncil/The-Journal-of-Research-in-Innovative-Teaching.html [last accessed 9 Dec 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Siemens G. Knowing knowledge. Raleigh (NC): Lulu Enterprises; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Carter B-A. Teacher-learners’ voices: not the same old song. Int J Innov Lang Learn Teach 2008;2:33–46
   Google Scholar
• Lord G, Lomicka L. Foreign language teacher preparation and asynchronous CMC: promoting reflective teaching. J Technol Teach Educ 2007;15:513–32
   Google Scholar
• Levenberg A, Caspi A. Comparing perceived formal and informal learning in face-to-face versus online environments. Interdiscipl J E-Learn Learn Objects 2010;6:323–33
   Google Scholar
• Payne EK, Berry DC. Connecting with your students in the year 2011: text messaging in the classroom. Athletic Train Educ J 2011;6:175–8
   Google Scholar
• Pew Internet Research Project. 2014. [Internet] Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/social-networking-fact-sheet/ [last accessed 6 Dec 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Pew Internet Research Project. Twitter use 2012. [Internet] Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/05/31/twitter-use-2012/ [last accessed 6 Dec 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. Millennials – confident, connected, open to change. [Internet] 2010. Available from: http://pewsocialtrends.org/files/2010/10/millennials-confident-connected-open-to-change.pdf [last accessed 6 Dec 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Bennett S, Matton K, Kervin L. The ‘digital natives’ debate: a critical review of the evidence. Br J Educ Technol 2008;39:775–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Edchat. (2014). [Internet]. Available from: http://edchat.pbworks.com/w/page/219908/FrontPage [last accessed 7 Dec 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Miles M, Huberman M. Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Davis K. Learning in 140 characters: teachers’ perceptions of Twitter for professional development [dissertation]. Ann Arbor (MI): Proquest LLC, University of Phoenix; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Hew K, Hara N. Empirical study of motivators and barriers of teacher online knowledge sharing. Educ Technol Res Dev 2007;55:573–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huston T, Weaver C. Peer coaching: professional development for experienced faculty. Innov Higher Educ 2008;33:5–20
   Google Scholar
• Belland B. Using the theory of habitus to move beyond the study of barriers to technology integration. Comput Educ 2009;52:353–64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar