The use of augmented auditory feedback to improve arm reaching in stroke: a case series

References

• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJH. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 2003;34:2181–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hömberg V. Neurorehabilitation approaches to facilitate motor recovery. Handbook Clin Neurol 2013;110:161–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liepert J. Evidence-based therapies for upper extremity dysfunction. Curr Opin Neurol 2010;23:678–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter AR, Connor LT, Dromerick AW. Rehabilitation after stroke: current state of the science. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2010;10:158–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Wolf SL. Task-oriented training to promote upper extremity recovery. In: Stein J, Harvey R, Macko R, et al., eds. Stroke recovery and rehabilitation. Demos Medical Publishing; 2009:267–90.
   Google Scholar
• Winstein C, Lewthwaite R, Blanton SR, et al. Infusing motor learning research into neurorehabilitation practice. J Neurologic Phys Ther 2014;38:190–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt R, Lee T. Augmented feedback. In: Schmidt R, Lee T, eds. Motor control and learning. 5th ed. Human Kinetics; 2011:393–428.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf G, Shea C. Understanding the role of augmented feedback: the good, the bad, and the ugly. In: Skill acquisition in sport: research, theory and practice. London, UK: Routledge; 2004:121–44.
   Google Scholar
• Buxbaum LJ, Johnson-Frey SH, Bartlett-Williams M. Deficient internal models for planning hand-object interactions in apraxia. Neuropsychologia 2005;43:917–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molier BI, Van Asseldonk EHF, Hermens HJ, Jannink MJA. Nature, timing, frequency and type of augmented feedback; does it influence motor relearning of the hemiparetic arm after stroke? A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:1799–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian SK, Massie CL, Malcolm MP, Levin MF. Does provision of extrinsic feedback result in improved motor learning in the upper limb poststroke? A systematic review of the evidence. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010;24:113–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk H, Jannink MJA, Hermens HJ. Effect of augmented feedback on motor function of the affected upper extremity in rehabilitation patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:202–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vliet PM, Wulf G. Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: what is the evidence? Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:831–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider S, Münte T, Rodriguez-Fornells A, et al. Music-supported training is more efficient than functional motor training for recovery of fine motor skills in stroke patients. Music Percept 2010;27:271–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider S, Schönle PW, Altenmüller E, Münte TF. Using musical instruments to improve motor skill recovery following a stroke. J Neurol 2007;254:1339–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson W, Schlaug G. The healing power of music. Sci Am 2015;26:32–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hove MJ, Spivey MJ, Krumhansl CL. Compatibility of motion facilitates visuomotor synchronization. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2010;36:1525–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel AD, Iversen JR, Chen Y, Repp BH. The influence of metricality and modality on synchronization with a beat. Exp Brain Res 2005;163:226–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repp B, Penel A. Auditory dominance in temporal processing: new evidence from synchronization with simultaneous visual and auditory sequences. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2002;28:1085–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repp BH, Penel A. Rhythmic movement is attracted more strongly to auditory than to visual rhythms. Psychol Res 2004;68:252–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JL, Zatorre RJ, Penhune VB. Interactions between auditory and dorsal premotor cortex during synchronization to musical rhythms. NeuroImage 2006;32:1771–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zatorre RJ, Chen JL, Penhune VB. When the brain plays music: auditory-motor interactions in music perception and production. Nature reviews. Neuroscience 2007;8:547–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangert M, Altenmüller EO. Mapping perception to action in piano practice: a longitudinal DC-EEG study. BMC Neurosci 2003;4:26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JL, Penhune VB, Zatorre RJ. Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions of the brain. Cerebral Cortex 2008;18:2844–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grahn JA, Brett M. Rhythm and beat perception in motor areas of the brain. J Cogn Neurosci 2007;19:893–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaut MH, Leins AK, Rice RR, et al. Rhythmic auditory stimulation improves gait more than NDT/Bobath training in near-ambulatory patients early poststroke: a single-blind, randomized trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21:455–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaut MH, McIntosh GC, Rice RR. Rhythmic facilitation of gait training in hemiparetic stroke rehabilitation. J Neurol Sci 1997;151:207–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luft AR, McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J, et al. Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;292:1853–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitall J, McCombe Waller S, Silver KH, Macko RF. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 2000;31:2390–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcolm MP, Massie C, Thaut M. Rhythmic auditory-motor entrainment improves hemiparetic arm kinematics during reaching movements: a pilot study. Top Stroke Rehabil 2009;16:69–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaut MH, Kenyon GP, Schauer ML, McIntosh GC. The connection between rhythmicity and brain function. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 1999;18:101–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirstea CM, Ptito A, Levin MF. Feedback and cognition in arm motor skill reacquisition after stroke. Stroke 2006;37:1237–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirstea MC, Levin MF. Improvement of arm movement patterns and endpoint control depends on type of feedback during practice in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21:398–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl–Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002;16:232–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott JH, Lehr AJ, Oxenham AJ. Individual differences reveal the basis of consonance. Curr Biol 2010;20:1035–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott JH, Oxenham AJ. Music perception, pitch, and the auditory system. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2008;18:452–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar