249
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Linking the Bournemouth Questionnaire for low back pain to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

, , &
Pages 1089-1096 | Received 03 Feb 2015, Accepted 01 Sep 2015, Published online: 12 Oct 2015

References

  • Cieza A, Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Qual Life Res 2005;14:1225–37.
  • Bombardier C. Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine 2000;25:3100–3.
  • Grotle M, Brox JI, Vøllestad NK. Functional status and disability questionnaires: what do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires. Spine 2005;30:130–40.
  • Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473–83.
  • Devlin NJ, Krabbe PFM. The development of new research methods for the valuation of EQ-5D-5L. Eur J Health Econ 2013;14 (Suppl 1):S1–3.
  • Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine 2000;25:2940–52. discussion 2952.
  • Arimura T, Hosoi M, Tsukiyama Y, et al. Pain questionnaire development focusing on cross-cultural equivalence to the original questionnaire: the Japanese version of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Pain Med 2012;13:541–51.
  • Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine 2000;25:3115–24.
  • Bolton JE, Breen AC. The Bournemouth questionnaire: a short-form comprehensive outcome measure. I. Psychometric properties in back pain patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999;22:503–10.
  • Melzack R. The McGill pain questionnaire: from description to measurement. Anesthesiology 2005;103:199–202.
  • World Health Organization. How to use the ICF: a practical manual for using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Exposure draft for comment. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
  • World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: WHO; 2001.
  • Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, et al. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:212–18.
  • Küçükdeveci AA, Oral A, Ilieva EM, et al. Inflammatory arthritis. The role of physical and rehabilitation medicine physicians. The European perspective based on the best evidence. A paper by the UEMS-PRM section professional practice committee. Eur J Phys Rehab Med 2013;49:551–64.
  • Alviar MJ, Olver J, Brand C, et al. Do patient-reported outcome measures used in assessing outcomes in rehabilitation after hip and knee arthroplasty capture issues relevant to patients? Results of a systematic review and ICF linking process. J Rehab Med 2011;43:374–81.
  • Castro S, Ferreira T, Dababnah S, Pinto AI. Linking autism measures with the ICF-CY: functionality beyond the borders of diagnosis and interrater agreement issues. Dev Neurorehabil 2013;16:321–31.
  • Andelic N, Johansen JB, Bautz-Holter E, et al. Linking self-determined functional problems of patients with neck pain to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Patient Prefer Adherence 2012;6:749–55.
  • Schiariti V, Klassen AF, Cieza A, et al. Comparing contents of outcome measures in cerebral palsy using the International Classification of Functioning (ICF-CY): a systematic review. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2014;18:1–12.
  • Fayed N, Cieza A, Bickenbach JE. Linking health and health-related information to the ICF: a systematic review of the literature from 2001 to 2008. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:1941–51.
  • Van der Mei SF, Dijkers MPJM, Heerkens YF. Participation as an outcome measure in psychosocial oncology: content of cancer-specific health-related quality of life instruments. Qual Life Res 2011;20:1617–27.
  • Ptyushkin P, Vidmar G, Burger H, Marincek C. Use of the international classification of functioning, disability, and health in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: linking issues and general perspectives. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2012;91:S48–54.
  • Silva SM, Corrêa FI, Faria CDCM. Comparison of quality-of-life instruments for assessing the participation after stroke based on the international classification of functioning. Disabil Health J 2013;17:470–8.
  • Stier-Jarmer M, Cieza A, Borchers M, Stucki G. How to apply the ICF and ICF core sets for low back pain. Clin J Pain 2009;25:29–38.
  • Sigl T, Cieza A, Brockow T, et al. Content comparison of low back pain-specific measures based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Clin J Pain 2006;22:147–53.
  • Bolton JE, Humphreys BK. The Bournemouth questionnaire: a short-form comprehensive outcome measure. II. Psychometric properties in neck pain patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999;25:141–8.
  • Newell D, Bolton JE. Responsiveness of the Bournemouth questionnaire in determining minimal clinically important change in subgroups of low back pain patients. Spine 2010;35:1801–6.
  • Madden R, Sykes C, Üstun TB. World health organization family of international classifications: definition, scope and purpose. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
  • World Health Organization. International classification of health interventions (ICHI). 2014.
  • Tempest S, Harries P, Kilbride C, De Souza L. To adopt is to adapt: the process of implementing the ICF with an acute stroke multidisciplinary team in England. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:1686–94.
  • Escorpizo R, Kostanjsek N, Kennedy C, et al. Harmonizing WHO’s international classification of diseases (ICD) and international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): importance and methods to link disease and functioning. BMC Public Health 2013;13:1
  • Bagraith KS, Strong J. The international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) can be used to describe multidisciplinary clinical assessments of people with chronic musculoskeletal conditions. Clin Rheumatol 2013;32:383–9.
  • Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, et al. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med 2002;34:205–10.
  • Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005;37:360–3.
  • Hill JC, Fritz JM. Psychosocial influences on low back pain, disability, and response to treatment. Phys Ther 2011;91:712–21.
  • Hill JC, Dunn KM, Lewis M, et al. A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:632–41.
  • Hill JC, Whitehurst DGT, Lewis M, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;378:1560–71.
  • Ang DC, Bair MJ, Damush TM, et al. Predictors of pain outcomes in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain co-morbid with depression: results from a randomized controlled trial. Pain Med 2010;11:482–91.
  • Campbell P, Bishop A, Dunn KM, et al. Conceptual overlap of psychological constructs in low back pain. Pain 2013;154:1783–91.
  • Daltroy LH, Cats-Baril WL, Katz JN, et al. The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment instrument: reliability and validity tests. Spine 1996;21:741–9.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.