Advanced search
Publication Cover
Disability and Rehabilitation Volume 38, 2016 - Issue 14
Submit an article Journal homepage
267
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Fixed multibracket dental therapy has challenges but can be successfully performed in young persons with Down syndrome

María Teresa AbeleiraDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry and Grupo de Investigación en Odontología Médico-Quirúrgica (OMEQUI), School of Medicine and Dentistry, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
,
Elisabeth PazosDepartment of Special Needs and Grupo de Investigación en Odontología Médico-Quirúrgica (OMEQUI), School of Medicine and Dentistry, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
,
Jacobo LimeresDepartment of Special Needs and Grupo de Investigación en Odontología Médico-Quirúrgica (OMEQUI), School of Medicine and Dentistry, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
,
Mercedes OutumuroDepartment of Special Needs and Grupo de Investigación en Odontología Médico-Quirúrgica (OMEQUI), School of Medicine and Dentistry, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
,
Márcio DinizDepartment of Special Needs and Grupo de Investigación en Odontología Médico-Quirúrgica (OMEQUI), School of Medicine and Dentistry, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
&
Pedro DizDepartment of Special Needs and Grupo de Investigación en Odontología Médico-Quirúrgica (OMEQUI), School of Medicine and Dentistry, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, SpainCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 1391-1396 | Received 04 Feb 2015, Accepted 30 Sep 2015, Published online: 23 Jan 2016

References

  • Loane M, Morris JK, Addor MC, et al. Twenty-year trends in the prevalence of Down syndrome and other trisomies in Europe: impact of maternal age and prenatal screening. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21:27–33.
  • Parker SE, Mai CT, Canfield MA, et al. National birth defects prevention network: updated national birth prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006. Birth Defects Res Part A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88:1008–1016.
  • Hickey F, Hickey E, Summar KL. Medical update for children with Down syndrome for the pediatrician and family practitioner. Adv Pediatr. 2012;59:137–157.
  • Kucik JE, Shin M, Siffel C, et al. Congenital Anomaly Multistate Prevalence and Survival Collaborative. Trends in survival among children with Down syndrome in 10 regions of the United States. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e27–e36.
  • Glasson EJ, Sullivan SG, Hussain R, et al. The changing survival profile of people with Down’s syndrome: implications for genetic counselling. Clin Genet. 2002;62:390–393.
  • Anders PL, Davis EL. Oral health of patients with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. Spec Care Dentist. 2010;30:110–117.
  • Korayem MA, Alkofide EA. Characteristics of Down syndrome subjects in a Saudi sample. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:30–37.
  • Jesuino FA, Valladares-Neto J. Craniofacial morphological differences between Down syndrome and maxillary deficiency children. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35:124–130.
  • Fiske J, Shafie HH. Down’s syndrome and oral care. Dent Update. 2001;28:148–157.
  • Desai SS, Flanagan TJ. Orthodontic considerations in individuals with Down syndrome: a case report. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:85–88.
  • Becker A, Shapira J. Orthodontics for the handicapped child. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18:55–67.
  • Seagriff-Curtin P, Pugliese S, Romer M. Dental considerations for individuals with Down syndrome. N Y State Dent J. 2006;72:33–35.
  • Jara L, Ondarza A, Blanco R, et al. The sequence of eruption of the permanent dentition in a Chilean sample with Down’s syndrome. Arch Oral Biol. 1993;38:85–89.
  • Russell BG, Kjaer I. Tooth agenesis in Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1995;55:466–471.
  • Acerbi AG, de Freitas C, de Magalhães MH. Prevalence of numeric anomalies in the permanent dentition of patients with Down syndrome. Spec Care Dentist. 2001;21:75–78.
  • de Moraes ME, de Moraes LC, Dotto GN, et al. Dental anomalies in patients with Down syndrome. Braz Dent J. 2007;18:346–350.
  • Ingalls TH, Butler RL. Mongolism, implications of dental anomalies. N Engl J Med. 1953;19:511–512.
  • Bauer D, Evans CA, BeGole EA, et al. Severity of occlusal disharmonies in Down syndrome. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:872367
  • Musich DR. Orthodontic intervention and patients with Down syndrome. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:734–745.
  • Faulks D, Mazille MN, Collado V, et al. Masticatory dysfunction in persons with Down’s syndrome. Part 2: management. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:863–869.
  • Chaushu S, Becker A. Behaviour management needs for the orthodontic treatment of children with disabilities. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22:143–149.
  • Becker A, Shapira J, Chaushu S. Orthodontic treatment for the special needs child. Prog Orthod. 2009;10:34–37.
  • Chadwick SM, Asher-Mcdade C. The orthodontic management of patients with profound learning disability. Br J Orthod. 1997;24:117–125.
  • Becker A, Shapira J, Chaushu S. Orthodontic treatment for disabled children – a survey of patient and appliance management. J Orthod. 2001;28:39–44.
  • Hobson RS, Nunn JH, Cozma I. Orthodontic management of orofacial problems in young people with impairments: review of the literature and case reports. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005;15:355–363.
  • Outumuro M, Abeleira MT, Caamaño F, et al. Maxillary expansion therapy in children with Down syndrome. Pediatr Dent. 2010;32:499–504.
  • Reuland-Bosma W, Liem RS, Jansen HW, et al. Morphological aspects of the gingiva in children with Down’s syndrome during experimental gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 1988;15:293–302.
  • Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, et al. The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:180–187.
  • Frank W, Pfaller K, Konta B. Oral health with fixed appliances orthodontics. GMS Health Technol Assess. 2008;4:Doc02
  • Becker A, Shapira J, Chaushu S. Orthodontic treatment for disabled children: motivation, expectation, and satisfaction. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22:151–158.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.