Advanced search
Publication Cover
Disability and Rehabilitation Volume 38, 2016 - Issue 22
Submit an article Journal homepage
430
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Applicability, validation and reproducibility of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III (SCIM III) in patients with non-traumatic spinal cord lesions

Camila de AlmeidaRehabilitation Center of the University Hospital of Ribeirão Preto, Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, BrazilCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Juliana Nogueira CoelhoRehabilitation Center of the University Hospital of Ribeirão Preto, Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
&
Marcelo RibertoRehabilitation Center of the University Hospital of Ribeirão Preto, Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Pages 2229-2234 | Received 01 Nov 2014, Accepted 04 Dec 2015, Published online: 22 Jan 2016

References

  • McKinley WO, Seel RT, Hardman JT. Nontraumatic spinal cord injury: incidence, epidemiology, and functional outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:619–623.
  • Roşulescu E, Stănoiu C, Buteică E, et al. Hereditary spastic paraplegia. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2009;50:299–303.
  • Shublaq M, Orsini M, Puccioni-Sohler M. Medidas de Avaliação na Paraparesia Espástica Tropical: Revisão da Literatura. Rev Neurosci. 2010;18:505–511.
  • McDonald JW, Sadowsky C. Spinal-cord injury. Lancet. 2002;359:417–425.
  • Graciani, Z. Caracterização motora e funcional da paraplegia espástica, atrofiaóptica e neuropatia periférica (síndrome Spoan) [dissertation]. São Paulo, Brazil: Medical School, Neurology Department, University of São Paulo USP; 2009. p. 93.
  • World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. São Paulo: University of São Paulo; 2003.
  • Minosso JSM. Validação, no Brasil, do Índice de Barthel em idosos atendidos em ambulatórios. Acta Paulista Enfermagem. 2010;23:218–223.
  • Riberto M, Miyazaki MH, Jucá SSH, et al. Validação da Versão Brasileira da Medida de Independência Funcional. ActaFisiatr. 2004;11:72–76.
  • Castro LHM, Chaves CJ, Callegaro D, et al. HTLV-I associated myelopathy in Brazil: a preliminary report. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1989;47:501–502.
  • Putten JJMF, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, et al. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66:480–484.
  • Catz A, Itzkovich M, Agranov E, et al. SCIM-spinal cord independence measure: a new disability scale for patients with spinal cord lesions. Spinal Cord. 1997;35: 850–856.
  • Catz A, Itzkovich M, Steinberg F, et al. The Catz-Itzkovich SCIM: a revised version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23: 263–268.
  • Dantas D, Amaro J, Silva P, et al. Avaliação da recuperação funcional em lesionados medulares aplicando a Medida de Independência na Lesão Medular (SCIM) – Contributo para a validação da versão portuguesa. Revista Da Sociedade Portuguesa De Medicina Física E De Reabilitação. 2012;22:20–27.
  • Itzkovitch M, Gelernter I, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: reliability and validity in a multi-center international study. Disabil Rehabilit. 2007;29:1926–1933.
  • Riberto M, Tavares DA, Rimoli JRJ, et al. Valida-tion of the Brazilian version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2014;72: 439–444.
  • Riberto M, Miyazaki MH, Jorge Filho D, et al. Reprodutibilidade da versão brasileira da Medida de Independência Funcional. ActaFisiatr. 2001;8:45–52.
  • Karamehmetoğlu SS, Karacan I, Elbaşi N, et al. The functional independence measure in spinal cord injured patients: comparison of questioning with observational rating. Spinal Cord. 1997;35:22–25.
  • Franzoi AC, Araújo AQC. Disability profile of patients with HTLV-1 associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM™). Spinal Cord. 2005;43:236–240.
  • Riberto M, Liporaci RF, Vieira F, et al. Setting up a human motion analysis laboratory: camera positioning for kinematic recording of gait. Int J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;1:131. doi:10.4172/2329-9096.000131
  • Collins TD, Ghoussayni SN, Ewins DJ, et al. A six degrees-of-freedom marker set for gait analysis: repeatability and comparison with a modified Helen Hayes set. Gait Posture. 2009;30:173–180.
  • De Bem AB, Lanzer EA, Filho ET, et al. Validade e confiabilidade de instrumento de avaliação da docência sob a ótica dos modelos de equação estrutural. Avaliação. 2011;16:375–401.
  • Mokkink B, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. International consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurements properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes: results of the COSMIN. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–745.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.